- Joined
- Nov 4, 2007
- Messages
- 14,802
Stevee Wonder said:And frankly, I think dropping something large from the sky will make a hole in the ground. Maybe you disagree.
The question here will be: How big will the hole be.
Stevee Wonder said:And frankly, I think dropping something large from the sky will make a hole in the ground. Maybe you disagree.
The difference is the whole Megaton business is retarded, for reasons discussed extensively in many places. TW's choices and consequences were quite reasonable.Stevee Wonder said:And this is different than blowing up Megaton and getting other quests how?
You are confusing freedom of speech with freedom to be an imbecile and throw feces at people.WhiskeyWolf said:Does freedom of speech = anarchy?Vault Dweller said:You're talking about two extremes as if the only answer to despotism is anarchy.WhiskeyWolf said:You know what TES is right? - not only that place, I been to few places with butthurt admins, sometimes I think there favorite activites are "making your life hard".
Stevee Wonder said:And frankly, I think dropping something large from the sky will make a hole in the ground. Maybe you disagree.
Vault Dweller said:You are confusing freedom of speech with freedom to be an imbecile and throw feces at people.
JarlFrank said:Stevee Wonder said:And frankly, I think dropping something large from the sky will make a hole in the ground. Maybe you disagree.
An unexploded nuke still doesn't make a crater large enough to build a town in it. It's a retarded concept. Also, why would anyone build a town near an unexploded nuclear bomb?
Stevee Wonder said:And frankly, I think dropping something large from the sky will make a hole in the ground. Maybe you disagree.
Stevee Wonder said:There are many things in the original Fallouts that could be considered 'retarded concepts'
You *are* a retarded concept, Stevee. Now shut the fuck up and go sit in the corner.Stevee Wonder said:Look, despite what you may think I am no noob here. I know all about the idea of 'retarded concepts' ....
So, anarchy = freedom to be an imbecile and throw feces at people?Vault Dweller said:You are confusing freedom of speech with freedom to be an imbecile and throw feces at people.WhiskeyWolf said:Does freedom of speech = anarchy?Vault Dweller said:You're talking about two extremes as if the only answer to despotism is anarchy.WhiskeyWolf said:You know what TES is right? - not only that place, I been to few places with butthurt admins, sometimes I think there favorite activites are "making your life hard".
Vault Dweller said:You *are* a retarded concept, Stevee. Now shut the fuck up and go sit in the corner.Stevee Wonder said:Look, despite what you may think I am no noob here. I know all about the idea of 'retarded concepts' ....
Actually you probably won't see me here anymore after today. I think the goal was accomplished. I didn't come here to convince people FO3 was good. The point was to get others to recognize what this site has become. Call it :declineofthecodex: if you want, but the fact is.. the media's view of you is completely justified and it only takes a few bad apples and couple of onlookers cheering them along to cement that.Admiral jimbob said:This one's too feverish. He'll burn himself out in a week or so, max.
Stevee Wonder said:Look, despite what you may think I am no noob here. I know all about the idea of 'retarded concepts' but in the end this is a video game. There are many things in the original Fallouts that could be considered 'retarded concepts'. It's all about perspective and someone else may not share yours.
To you it's a retarded concept. That's an opinion and that's fine. It doesn't make you better than someone with a different opinion. And it in no way justifies what lengths some of the members here will and have gone to to express their anger.
I am not pointing at you specifically, but in the eyes of the gaming public at large you are all one in the same, especially with the amount of condoning that occurs.
The answer is, of course, that the nuke fell from SPACE!1! Aliens must've thrown it at us.Dark Elf said:It's simply a matter of mass, velocity and force of impact. Your average aeroplane is bigger and heavier than your average nuclear warhead, but you don't see plane crashes resulting in giant craters do you now?
On a gaming forum? Yes. I mean... we don't need to go far to get an example, do we?WhiskeyWolf said:So anarchy = freedom to be an imbecile and throw feces at people?
Elwro said:Not all opinions are of equal worth. Simply because there is such thing as justification. Some opinions are more informed than others, because people who have them used their brain to form them. If someone honestly thought all opinions were worth the same, I'm pretty sure such a person would stay far, far away from the internet.
A gaming forum you say... hmm, that makes sense.Vault Dweller said:On a gaming forum? Yes. I mean... we don't need to go far to get an example, do we?WhiskeyWolf said:So anarchy = freedom to be an imbecile and throw feces at people?
Dark Elf said:Stevee Wonder said:Look, despite what you may think I am no noob here. I know all about the idea of 'retarded concepts' but in the end this is a video game. There are many things in the original Fallouts that could be considered 'retarded concepts'. It's all about perspective and someone else may not share yours.
To you it's a retarded concept. That's an opinion and that's fine. It doesn't make you better than someone with a different opinion. And it in no way justifies what lengths some of the members here will and have gone to to express their anger.
I am not pointing at you specifically, but in the eyes of the gaming public at large you are all one in the same, especially with the amount of condoning that occurs.
You seem to be advocating the notion that all opinions are equal and thus equally valid. Objectively this might be the case, but opinions are always subjective and therefore your assumption feels rather empty.
Also, one should always have the option to judge a sequel by the standards set by its predecessors. Building a town around an unexploded nuke simply isn't coherent with the storyline, therefore such complaints are justified by reason.
No, the word "cool" doesn't say anything - at least that's what they told me at school.Stevee Wonder said:If I said Fallout 3 looks cool does that make it valid?
Stevee Wonder said:Yes, but having one under a church makes sense. And exploding it next to the town and not having ANY COLLATERAL DAMAGE whatsoever is completely and totally logical.
Vault Dweller said:You *are* a retarded concept, Stevee. Now shut the fuck up and go sit in the corner.Stevee Wonder said:Look, despite what you may think I am no noob here. I know all about the idea of 'retarded concepts' ....
Dark Elf said:Stevee Wonder said:Yes, but having one under a church makes sense. And exploding it next to the town and not having ANY COLLATERAL DAMAGE whatsoever is completely and totally logical.
Fallout Tactics, right? Which is pretty universally bashed as being a bad game and non-canon by the Codex?
I haven't played it, but you're spot on that it doesn't make sense.