Multidirectional
Arcane
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2009
- Messages
- 7,348
MetalCraze said:WW2 setting should die
I think it's ratings should finally drop soon after WW3.
MetalCraze said:WW2 setting should die
Mangoose said:WW2 online?Zinc said:Sounds awful to me. I wish someone would create a realistic battlefield MMO, including infantry, artillery, air support - everything. Something akin to Battlefield 1942 or Battlefield 2, but massively online - with proper ranks, customizables etc. Like Planetside, but without the shitty gameplay and ridiculous setting. I believe it has been tried before, but they screwed it up. If it could be pulled off successfully, it would be incredible.
Firelest said:New "Real Simulator" teaser released http://www.worldoftanks.com/gallery/video/1
LOL
Zinc said:Firelest said:New "Real Simulator" teaser released http://www.worldoftanks.com/gallery/video/1
LOL
What the fuck was that?
Our main gun is damaged, we can't fire accurately
It has super accuracy now, about 3m scatter radius over a kilometer when fully aimed. No need for ranging yet.overtenemy said:What's the sense if having artillery if there's no infantry? I'm no expert, but I'm fairly certain artillery back then wasn't much of an anti-tank weapon. It wouldn't destroy a tank without a direct hit, and good luck getting one.
No campaign implemented yet. Just one battle type, capture the enemy base, 15 players per team.Also how does the gameplay work? Are there "instances" in which you have various objectives to take? One team defends another attacks? Does it affect a larger campaign map?
Tigers reportedly kick ass once you upgrade them with the 88. The Maus is statistically inferior to IS-7 (the player-controlled raid boss machine of doom), but more powerful then everything else. Not sure what its strong points are, I've only ever seen one.How gnarly are tigers? And how gnarly is the MAUS!?!