I've done my fight for the cause and in the last 30 days I've bought Age of Decadence, Battle Brothers, Serpent in the Staglands, Dark Souls, D:OS, The banner saga, Grimrock 2 and Valkyria Chronicles. The first three paid at full price, and the rest at various sales. I'm ashamed to admit that I've also bought PoE (but it was only 14 euro). The GOG and now Steam sale are making me lose my mind and buy too many games.
I don't see why PoE would be so bad as to evoke shame. Its not Dragon Age Inquisition or Diablo 3. I think DA:I is pretty crap and I am not ashamed I bought it. I am pretty much done with Bioware games though, almost no way I buy another one. The lies and stupidity of the gaming presstitutes disgusts me but beyond that meh. Diablo 3 is the only thing I can think of that would be make me feel ashamed, but the whole situation with that game just make me want to vomit.
I can see people thinking POE is an average RPG, in that some aspects of its systems/class design are flawed and some aspect of encounter implementation and I suppose although I don't agree some people were disappointed with the stronghold (personally I like Od Nua a lot). But PoE is at worst average and IMO more like above average. People saying its crap, it just seems like hyperbole to me.
Darth Roxor completely ridiculous "review" presented as official RPGCodex review for over a month has negatively skewed the perception of this great game to the impressionable newbie and weak minded members of this forum.
One bad review isn't enough to make me buy or not enjoy a game. On the other side, for most purchases I read many reviews and watch some gameplay, torrent the game and do a demo, etc. to see if it's worth the money. PoE was bought before reading many reviews since it was praised as hell and also the short time I've spent before buying made me think it's like the good old BG2. The fact that Obsidian made it also contributed to my hasty buy decision.
Darth Roxor's review was maybe a bit too extreme, but I remember reading some post on the RPGCodex to a link to the game breakdown on the RPGWatch forums were some autistic person made a very detailed breakdown of all the aspects of this game. If it's one thing that made disappointed after reading all the posts on this forum for the review, is that combat is a missed possibility. In a game were no experience is awarded for it and can't be evaded for the most part, a
good decent combat engine was absolutely required. Now, all this being said, I always wait for all the bought games to release their DLC/expansions and after that I play them. Maybe one year from now, the game will be better.
But that is the thing. The combat is decent. Its just not great.
I can, in great detail with maths, explain a number of cases in which the combat systems and encounters are flawed. For example the AI behind fampyrs and the poor design choices for "prayer" spell meant to "counter" things is clearly off. The fampyrs always immediately target the class meant to counter, the counters are in no way reliably or even particularly useful without like 3 other things layered on top, and you can't pre-buff anyway and fampyrs cast their spells immediately and extremely fast. Clearly this is screwed up.
But the combat is still decent. Is it perfect? No I just gave you a clearly flawed thing. Another flaw; the Chanter class does not scale. The base design simply can't scale past a certain level, it just won't work. Chanters are still perfectly playable and even enjoyable class. They would be terrible as is if they did POE 2 and had the game go to level 20. Flat out wouldn't work. Couldn't work.
Again this isn't DA:I where its literally crap. It has problems but it has a number of good parts as well. Its absolutely nothing to be ashamed of. It has rough parts and also some, what I would call, mistakes systems wise. So what? Give me one good RPG that doesn't. You think I can't make radically overpowered character in Wizardry 8? Because I can, fuck yeah I can.
Is PoE great? Not in the system arena and not in the encounter arena. But both of those are decent enough to be enjoyable if you like IE type RTwP stuff. Some people may say its great in the art and story department. That is fine. I liked those I don't care to say whether they are good or great but they certainly are not bad, not in the context of video games.
I don't think the class builds are at the level of great either but they are sufficiently interesting to be worth some time. Underrrail is better at interesting build options, but that doesn't make PoE unplayable or bad or whatever.
You can certainly have some rather novel and interesting playing in POE. My first full playthrough was with a party of 4 rangers, a priest and chanter all of them specced for DPS and interrupt. No tank character, not even a real magey type. I had the animal companions tank everything. It was interesting and challenging to clear the ogre level of Od Nua at level 4-5.
If someone picks up PoE and tries and goes "You know what this just isn't my cup of tea". Hey that's cool, I feel that way about Blackguards 2, it just doesn't grab me in any real way. But shame? This is just not in any way accurate.