Undead Phoenix said:
I doubt it - he's the sort who'll get the job done. Albeit with a shitload of collateral damage, unneccesary extravagance, and stealing all the glory from the stalwart, stoic Brits who meticulously planned, supplied and made the mission possible. A true yank
That said, we'd be pissing off the sheriff, which is why I'll say we should go with
D
Yeah, but if you take the modified version of B, you
won't be pissing the Sheriff off, because none of her people will have to die. If anything, she'll probably respect us more for taking one for the team. When the fuck do Ventrue ever get shot to achieve a goal? She will respect Anthony's dedication to the plan - we could have put her grunts on the line if we wanted, but we instead put ourselves at personal risk to get shit done.
Undead Phoenix said:
Eames is our ally. If she takes the credit? So be it. We're on good terms with her and the power-behind-the-power always lives longer than the figurehead as long as they don't set their sights too high. Besides, she's a real classy babe.
No way, fuck her. She's not classy, she's patronizing (calling the fucking Sheriff "dear" like she's a goddamn child) and will only keep us around so long as she can milk us for her ends. I made a mistake in voting to accept the invitation. God, I will be so pissed if she tries to put a blood-bond on us somehow. Then again, without accepting her invite, I doubt that she would have agreed to put pressure on the Sabbat with an assault of her own. So I guess it's not all that bad. But still, it was a move made out of desperation and it wasn't strategic. But this one is.
The combined A and D option is a perfect example of how more isn't necessarily better. People, the Sabbat will be suspicious. So a Camarilla squad leads a retreating shovelhead to discover the Caecilian cave and by some crazy coincidence, right at the same time, it just so happens that Wilkinson overheard how we wanted to kill du Marchais using some bizarre worms we found in a sewer? Really guys, nothing suspicious at all! It's information overkill.
D on its own is still tips our hand far too much. As Erebus mentioned, it makes the existence of the trap way too obvious. However, with the modified B option, no suspicion will be drawn. Wilkinson will get back to her superiors, informing them that the Patrician has been killed by someone he thought was his friend, a Malkavian named Jamieson. As Sommers stood up to shake the man's hand, Jamieson drew a sawed-off shotgun and fired. She'll mention that he shot her as well and that he kept ranting about how he wanted to kill every Camarilla fuck he could find.
Dubrik will be positively thrilled to find the man who killed his rival, Anthony Sommers. He will try to establish contact with Jamieson right away. To Dubrik, killing Sommers is worth killing 10 Camarilla enforcers - he's been trying to get us since even before the first update, so having his desire for revenge suddenly sated by this mysterious stranger will make him vulnerable. This version of B is way better than Jamieson killing three random Camarilla grunts who nobody, except maybe our most important ally, cares about. The good Bishop will get into contact with Jamieson, arrange a meeting between the London Sabbat and our boy Donny, then he'll work his persuasive magic on them. He's done it countless times before. It's perfect.
Guys, we've taken the EXTREME option last choice - don't go for the half-measure now. I've got an alternative that allows us to maintain good relations (or even better relations) with the Sheriff, while at the same time leaving the Sabbat none the wiser to what we've got up our sleeve.
The other options are vague and they don't offer a clear, step-by-step method for executing this con. With D, we get some Sabbat sucker to play patsy and hope that his discovery makes it to the Sabbat higher-ups (that is, of course, if he isn't the ambitious type and he doesn't get eaten). And even if it does get to the higher-ups, we have to hope that they don't get suspicious, which they almost certainly will because we made it glaringly obvious by leading them to the mother lode. It's quite inelegant.
With A, there's the same problem. We basically have the problem of giving too much, too soon, and arousing suspicion that way. With my suggestion, we call Wilkinson here only as muscle (completely plausible, we're in the middle of a war), but instead of doing anything, we draw attention away from ourselves by being a bystander. We're simply there to get shot and lead her in the direction we want - less is more in this situation.
We need to see this shit through and stay the course right now. To make anyone open to a con, you need to exploit their weaknesses. Angelus' is the Caecilian, but Dubrik's is us. If we play it this way, we'll have them wrapped around our finger. With the other options, they are bad cons because we are inelegantly shoving our enemies to where we want them to go - with the modified B option, we give them a gentle touch and they lead themselves to their own doom. Those other options are clumsy and direct, while this one is subtle.