SCO
Arcane
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2009
- Messages
- 16,320
curry said:Fuck Masquerade, you should play Requiem instead.
Someone is butthurt about the metaplot
curry said:Fuck Masquerade, you should play Requiem instead.
Serious_Business said:curry said:Fuck Masquerade, you should play Requiem instead.
Seriously?
ironyuri said:It sounds like we've pissed Oscar off for the moment, hopefully this won't cut him off permanently (considering we'll be rewarding him thoroughly and we still have Fellowes).
But if we do lose Oscar we're going to need to find another information source quickly.
Storyfag said:B, of course. If we die horribly, can we continue to play as someone else? Bishop Dubrik? A Tzimisce Bishop? The Anarch leader? Fellowes?
This sounds good to me. I'd like to try a thaumaturgical detective kind of character - several different non-combat paths (blood, technomancy, spirit manipulation, ...) and as many rituals as possible.grotsnik said:B) A NEW DAWN, A NEW DAY. Play with character chosen from the OP selection, with maybe a couple new of ones added in as well. You'll start some time (not too long) after the old character died, and events that occurred during/were caused by the Patrician chapter will affect you, but you'll have a new story all of your own.
Serious_Business said:This cheapens our character's existence, I'm not sure if you should be saying those things. The plot is moving very fast and is a bit extreme in my opinion (Commander Shepperd approves), we don't have much space to plan things and make conscious decisions, and I'm not sure why our lives should be on the line all the time. Death destroys all previous choices we made, so it's kind of lame to just switch characters as quickly as this. What I mean is this - we didn't invest enough into this char to really care about his loss at this point. You'll be seeing some pretty kamikaze shit if you lop off our chars' heads at whim and we can start over just like that. But yes, I understand your point.
grotsnik said:If it helps,
Since you pretty much uninanimously called my feeble attempt at a bluff by voting 'B', I don't mind saying it - you're not about to die.
SCO said:You could have concurrent distinct characters written by different authors (you'd need to setup secret google doc with shared info of the major characters that you'd update with plans/hates/currentoperations so things make sense). They could even be opponents like sabbat and cammie).
But you'd need someone organized and who writes well, and knows vampire inside and out.
Someone like Serious_Business for instance.
This is pretty much megalomania though.
Too long can get boring, true. But if it's too short then we don't get invested as much in the character and our eventual death is not as meaningful. Or so I feel, anyway. But, yes, this was a nice turn of events, or at least so far.root said:anyway, i'd rather have a short but interesting game where we die at some point rather than a long and uneventful one where take no risks and nothing ever happens. so kudos
SCO said:You could have concurrent distinct characters written by different authors (you'd need to setup secret google doc with shared info of the major characters that you'd update with plans/hates/currentoperations so things make sense). They could even be opponents like sabbat and cammie).
But you'd need someone organized and who writes well, and knows vampire inside and out.
Someone like Serious_Business for instance.
This is pretty much megalomania though.
root said:anyway, i'd rather have a short but interesting game where we die at some point rather than a long and uneventful one where take no risks and nothing ever happens. so kudos
That gives me an idea: If there's enough interest at that point, perhaps we could play a red listed vampire at some point in the future. Spend our wits evading capture or death, trying to take advantage of a city to put the alastors off our trail long enough to buy a bit of time. That would certainly involve taking quite a few risks (since everything short of "go to Antarctica and enter perpetual torpor" is risky). Might be interesting.root said:not saying 'hail sabbat' and shootin' the prince in the head.