Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Interesting post on ESF about Daggerfall.

Hazelnut

Erudite
Joined
Dec 17, 2002
Messages
1,490
Location
UK
Twinfalls said:
What, comments from Steve "I think a lot of people will be surprised by the strength of our dialogue this time around" Meister?

Maybe he meant that we'd all be surprised by the strength of the dialogue in that it was even weaker than people expected.

It's possible. :lol:
 

Twinfalls

Erudite
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
3,903
lol. His unrecorded comment straight after was 'that's right, our dialogue is WEAK AS PISS!' and then he stood up and his skirt blew up like Marylin Monroe
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom