FeelTheRads just hates AoD design and couldn't play it for more than 5 minutes
Funny thing is, both toro and FeelTheRads don't know Age of Decadence (the former has played only a bit,
hasn't even finished it, the latter none at all)
Would you decide please? Did I play it for no more than 5 minutes or not at all?
http://www.rpgcodex.net/forums/inde...e-game-of-the-year.106067/page-4#post-4311525 (saying that "the game teleports you from place to place and tells you about events and people you never knew about like you are supposed to know about them?")
Just because you put it in small lettering, doesn't make it less of an apologist lie. I played enough of the game to see that happen.
And then, I think probably later in that thread comes VD and explains that it's because things happen without your input and you have to take those as news reaching you or some retarded bullshit like that.
So, yeah, I did play enough to drop it as the piece of shit that it is. Or, considering that while I played it I was unsure if I was actually playing or I was merely a shell through which VD played, maybe I didn't play it after all.
But, I will not complete it even once, let alone 7 times, which is, as I understand, the required minimum to get how it's the best game ever. So, sorry, you can continue with your butthurt about how people didn't play it, but the game is still shit.
The reason for that is because contrary to toro, Sykar, FeelTheRads and other UR fanboys you weren't lying
You really shouldn't call other people fanboys when you were exposed for a rabid fanboy who posts on any forum he finds about how great AoD is and how much better it is than Underrail. You're only really answering "you're stupid" with "no, you're stupid".
And, I will remind you again that I rated Underrail with a 4 (which as time passes I realize could easily be a 3 instead), while you and your buttbuddies rated AoD 5 and keep going about it like it's the best thing since Skyrim.