Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Fallout vs Fallout 3, which is better?

WhiskeyWolf

RPG Codex Polish Car Thief
Staff Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
14,810
uhjghvt said:
Fallout 3 vs Cabelas Super Deer Hunter 2009, which is better?

deer hunter has better animations and ragdolling I'm not even lying[/spoilar]
Besides that everything other is PURE FAIL/SHIT, compared to that game FO3 is a shining example of awesomeness.
 

uhjghvt

Scholar
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
463
WhiskeyWolf said:
Besides that everything other is PURE FAIL/SHIT, compared to that game FO3 is a shining example of awesomeness.
yes but my point is that FO3 has worse animations than a game that's targeted at rednecks who don't know the difference and sells for $10-$15 at wal-mart
 

Amateur

Novice
Joined
Oct 23, 2006
Messages
95
Fallout 1 and 2 were both very generous in allowing the player to carve their own path through the game. OK, so the first entry in the series did lumber you with a fairly strict time limit during its first half, but after that you were pretty much given free reign to explore the world - you could even dash straight to the final bosses, if you were feeling lucky. We're still forbidden from discussing the main plot of Fallout 3, but from what we've played it seems you'll have a similar degree of freedom. On our first play-test we ended up in a far northern section of the map, while our second hands-on took us to the south west - and in neither instance did the game force us to head back for the sake of the main story.

WTF is he talkibng about. Changes depending on time was one of the strong point of fallout not a flaw. It made the long term decisions important. When you thought you saved ghouls if you wait too long you saw that they are killed by mutants, this is a consequence. In oblivion you could spend 50 years and see that there is no progress in the invasion, now is this freedom?

Walking the map is NOT the ultimate freedom in games although it may be strong point of these rpg's to fps'.
 

St. Toxic

Arcane
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
9,098
Location
Yemen / India
Here's what I think:

buttfuckx2ef0.gif
 

Lingwe

Liturgist
Joined
Jun 11, 2007
Messages
519
Location
australia
And, we reckon, it's going to introduce a huge swathe of new players to the Fallout world - and that can only be a good thing.

Roughly quoting Roshambo: "if those new players are X-Brick morons then this is not a good thing".
 

St. Toxic

Arcane
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
9,098
Location
Yemen / India
Yes! Gather around the class-clown in a circlejerk, reposting the gif over and over! Soon the Codex will be nothing more than an extension of the endless Wastes of DAC! :twisted:
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom