Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Fallout vs Fallout 3, which is better?

Vault Dweller

Commissar, Red Star Studio
Developer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Messages
28,035
http://www.videogamer.com/features/arti ... 8-529.html

With Fallout 3 almost upon us, we thought that now might be a good time to compare how the game plays with the two original, Black Isle developed Fallout games from the late nineties. We've not played the full thing, of course - but having clocked up seven hours of exploration we've now seen enough to make some general comparisons.
In the original Fallout games everything was viewed from an isometric perspective, giving you a fairly generous view of your character and the surrounding environment. In standard play you'd be free to move around as you wish, but whenever a fight broke out the game would shift to a turn-based system. Depending on your character's Agility rating, you'd have a number of action points (AP) which could be spent on moving, firing weapons and accessing your inventory. Now, this setup may sound totally archaic to some modern gamers, but the fact is that it resulted in a high degree of tactical consideration....

As you probably know by now, Fallout 3 is primarily a first-person game; a third-person perspective is available, but we can't see many people using it for any length of time. While you can choose to play the whole game as a real-time shooter, you'll find it much easier to use the VATS system, which allows you to pause time and queue up a limited number of AP on targeted shots. There's certainly a degree of similarity to the old games here, with an emphasis on blinding or crippling your opponent - but you'll rarely have enough points to end a battle using VATS alone. We've found that in practice we tend to soften the enemy up with a few manually-aimed shots, before switching to VATS to make a few decisive hits. It's not exactly old-school Fallout, but it's not Doom either. It is, however, very satisfying. We were a bit worried that VATS might get old quite quickly, but we now believe the balance of its use is just about right.
We suspect the dialogue and tone will be the biggest bones of contention for hardcore Fallout fans. Pithy dialogue and description was a key part of the charm to the original games; there's a very distinct tone that was always going to be a big challenge for Bethesda to replicate. On a visual level, there's really no questioning the fact that the team has done an amazing job of recreating Interplay's post-nuclear-war world, but at times the dialogue is perhaps a little too theatrical for its own good. That's not to say it's badly executed - the standard of voice acting is very high, on the whole - but the actual tone of the script writing seems to vary quite a lot from area to area. An example: The ravaged settlers of Arefu seemed like a fairly miserable, desperate bunch - but on the way there we ran into a merchant named Crow, a colourful chap who seemed far too jolly for a man who risks his life by walking the wasteland for a living.

The point here is that Fallout veterans who come to this game expecting the same style of gritty patter are likely to get wound up rather quickly. For the rest of you, your reaction for the dialogue is going to be a matter of taste. To reiterate: there's no real problem with the way speech is delivered. It's more to do with the fact that what's actually being said can be a bit overly dramatic. Sometimes this approach works, at other times it's a tad hammy. If you've seen any video footage of Megaton's Mister Burke, you'll get the idea: as soon as he opens his gob, you know that he's a boo-hiss villain - and as boo-hiss villains go, he's really pretty well done. We've not heard much of Liam Neeson's contribution to the game, but we love the gravelly pomp of Malcolm McDowell's John Henry Eden - the leader of the fascistic Enclave. So far we've only heard his radio broadcasts, but we look forward to meeting him in the flesh (or pixels, whatever).
After watching the, uh, unoptimized gameplay, it sure looks like the VATS is a built-in cheat mode, dialogues are pretty bad, and voice-acting is utter shit.
 

VonVentrue

Cipher
Patron
Joined
Jul 16, 2007
Messages
814
Location
HPCE
Divinity: Original Sin Wasteland 2
article said:
No, it's not exactly the same - and it was never going to be - but from what we've played, we reckon that Fallout 3 will offer one of the most exciting and involving video game adventures of 2008. And, we reckon, it's going to introduce a huge swathe of new players to the Fallout world - and that can only be a good thing.

Bethesda's pathetic excuse for a 'vision' of Fallout world, Mr.Kelly. Huge difference.

The hype machine is rolling all right.
 
Joined
Jun 14, 2008
Messages
6,927
In the original Fallout games everything was viewed from an isometric perspective, giving you a fairly generous view of your character and the surrounding environment. In standard play you'd be free to move around as you wish, but whenever a fight broke out the game would shift to a turn-based system. Depending on your character's Agility rating, you'd have a number of action points (AP) which could be spent on moving, firing weapons and accessing your inventory...

The moment I read that I had this vision of a history class.

:/
 

Dire Roach

Prophet
Joined
Feb 28, 2007
Messages
1,592
Location
Machete-Knight Academy
Fallout 3 is better than the first gaem because it had a bigger developer team and budgit. Fallout 1 did not pass the test of time and today Black Aisle Studio is broke. Meanwhile Bethseda is the most succesful RPG company on teh market so they got to buy the Failout name and turn it into a gold mine.

The histories speaks for themselfs!
 

Ion Flux

Savant
Joined
Jul 13, 2005
Messages
1,301
Location
Up way, way past my bedtime.
Project: Eternity
Dire Roach said:
Fallout 3 is better than the first gaem because it had a bigger developer team and budgit. Fallout 1 did not pass the test of time and today Black Aisle Studio is broke. Meanwhile Bethseda is the most succesful RPG company on teh market so they got to buy the Failout name and turn it into a gold mine.

The histories speaks for themselfs!

The market has spoken. Stephen Colbert approves.
 

JarlFrank

I like Thief THIS much
Patron
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
33,217
Location
KA.DINGIR.RA.KI
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
An example: The ravaged settlers of Arefu seemed like a fairly miserable, desperate bunch - but on the way there we ran into a merchant named Crow, a colourful chap who seemed far too jolly for a man who risks his life by walking the wasteland for a living.

"Hello! Oblivion gates are opening everywhere, even near the major cities, and I'm just an unarmed merchant, but still I don't have anything better to do than travelling from one city to the other and telling you about the recent rumors!"
 

Jaime Lannister

Arbiter
Joined
Jun 15, 2007
Messages
7,183
In fact, how is Fallout 3 worse than Bloodlines?

Loading screens? Check.
Unpickable locks? Check.
Some cringe-worthy VO and dialogue? Check.
Numerous combat flaws? Check.
 

Mareus

Magister
Joined
Apr 5, 2008
Messages
1,404
Location
Atlantis
Jaime Lannister said:
In fact, how is Fallout 3 worse than Bloodlines?

Loading screens? Check.
Unpickable locks? Check.
Some cringe-worthy VO and dialogue? Check.
Numerous combat flaws? Check.
Trying to go against the hivemind, eh? Thumbs up, but I think you will have to find some better arguments.
 

Durwyn

Prophet
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Messages
1,132
Location
Erewhon
Jaime Lannister said:
In fact, how is Fallout 3 worse than Bloodlines?

Loading screens? Check.
Unpickable locks? Check.
Some cringe-worthy VO and dialogue? Check.
Numerous combat flaws? Check.
Epic fail. Bloodlines dialogues were a masterpiece compared to Fo3 ones... Or compared to most of RPGs
 

Solohk

Scholar
Joined
Aug 15, 2006
Messages
289
Location
Madam Lil's
Mareus said:
Jaime Lannister said:
In fact, how is Fallout 3 worse than Bloodlines?

Loading screens? Check.
Unpickable locks? Check.
Some cringe-worthy VO and dialogue? Check.
Numerous combat flaws? Check.
Trying to go against the hivemind, eh? Thumbs up, but I think you will have to find some better arguments.
And this coming from Mareus! Ooohhh burn!
 

HanoverF

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Nov 23, 2002
Messages
6,083
MCA Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Codex USB, 2014 Divinity: Original Sin 2
Jaime Lannister said:
In fact, how is Fallout 3 worse than Bloodlines?

Loading screens? Check.
Unpickable locks? Check.
Some cringe-worthy VO and dialogue? Check.
Numerous combat flaws? Check.

Andhaira 2.0
 

uhjghvt

Scholar
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
463
Fallout 3 vs Cabelas Super Deer Hunter 2009, which is better?

deer hunter has better animations and ragdolling I'm not even lying[/spoilar]
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom