Multidirectional
Arcane
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2009
- Messages
- 7,348
no way I'd replay FO2. Life is too short.
No, Fallout 1 is too short.
no way I'd replay FO2. Life is too short.
There is only one Fallout game.
Two.
Everything went shit after a good liftoff and reaching the stratosphere.
Okay, I'll cut the edgy crap. FO2 is better than 99.99% of the RPGs that will be released in what remains of our lives. It's just that it's merely "bloatware" over original Fallout, combat gets boring because the system was never designed to be a long game, and I never felt like caring for anything happenning in the game unlike what happens with FO1 perfectly self-contained plot and setting. I can replay FO1 anytime, but no way I'd replay FO2. Life is too short.
no way I'd replay FO2. Life is too short.
No, Fallout 1 is too short.
Fallout 1 is the best of them all but I'm glad 2 and New Vegas exist, they're good games too.
Fallout 3 is retarded shit that goes way way waaaay beyond FO2's zany pop culture references.
FO2 may have lots of dumb jokes, but FO3 has vampires and a city of children
So what is your take on "Fallout" 4?
You got spared, trust me.Fallout 1 is the best of them all but I'm glad 2 and New Vegas exist, they're good games too.
Fallout 3 is retarded shit that goes way way waaaay beyond FO2's zany pop culture references.
FO2 may have lots of dumb jokes, but FO3 has vampires and a city of children
So what is your take on "Fallout" 4?
Haven't played it because my graphics card is too old.
You got spared, trust me.Fallout 1 is the best of them all but I'm glad 2 and New Vegas exist, they're good games too.
Fallout 3 is retarded shit that goes way way waaaay beyond FO2's zany pop culture references.
FO2 may have lots of dumb jokes, but FO3 has vampires and a city of children
So what is your take on "Fallout" 4?
Haven't played it because my graphics card is too old.
I tried to get into it for some reason. I really did.
I failed.
It's even worse than Fallout 3 - but a better shooter, at least.
There is only one Fallout game.
Two.
Everything went shit after a good liftoff and reaching the stratosphere.
Okay, I'll cut the edgy crap. FO2 is better than 99.99% of the RPGs that will be released in what remains of our lives. It's just that it's merely "bloatware" over original Fallout, combat gets boring because the system was never designed to be a long game, and I never felt like caring for anything happenning in the game unlike what happens with FO1 perfectly self-contained plot and setting. I can replay FO1 anytime, but no way I'd replay FO2. Life is too short.
I don’t really have the energy to start fighting about tastes. I respect your point of view, and I do get where it’s coming from, but do not share it. My comment was meant as a similiar offhand throw as yours.
Fallout is by far a the tighter and more cohesive package as a work of fiction, but it is also very compact. Fallout 2, to me, is better as a game and doesn’t really fall too far with what it does worse. I don’t give a fuck about few bad jokes, or every town not being honed to perfection, or the slight change in tone and setting progression (those two are actually rather welcome changes to push things forward), I stopped nitpicking about that shit long time ago. Combat is also... how you take it. To me it not being a heavyhanded feature like in other, more combat centered games, is a good thing as the focus is more on the overall experience and not just combat grind. The big picture is what matters to me; as long as I’m having fun with the game all’s fine. I can pick features to criticise, and agree with criticisms of others, but there’s more good than there’s bad to start trashing it. That’s my general gist of it - in short.
I replay both games on somewhat regular basis, but most of the time the choice is Fallout 2. Which ever the game and what ever the reason, I don’t think about whether or not I’m wasting my time. I’m having fun.
Haven't played it because my graphics card is too old.
Whoa, a time travelerYou're boring.
We need to cease and desist any complaints at all with either Fallout 1 or 2. One bad point might drive Bethesda to use the Oblivion engine and create Fallout FPS: Mutant Mayhem. You never know what might drive those crazies over the edge.
Fallout 1 is the best of them all but I'm glad 2 and New Vegas exist, they're good games too.
Fallout 3 is retarded shit that goes way way waaaay beyond FO2's zany pop culture references.
FO2 may have lots of dumb jokes, but FO3 has vampires and a city of children
So what is your take on "Fallout" 4?
Haven't played it because my graphics card is too old.
Was it just me or was San Francisco really underwhelming? Lame, uninspired, etc. etc. The ship with the hacker revolutionary people was cool I guess, but the rest...