Role-Player said:No. I suspect we'll have a review of the official game somewhere along the road - as soon as possible - but these kinds of modifications shouldn't really be factored into it. It would be like reviewing Temple of Elemental Evil with the Circle of Eight fixes and add-ons.
Maybe we could do a post-review article highlighting the changes, but that's probably a stretch.
Sir_Brennus said:Well, technically TSLRP is not a "mod" but a "unsupported patch" - which is totally different to Co8 5.0.
TSLR does NOT add anything to the game that wasn't in there for a start. Best proof is that parts of TSLRP are no longer needed as the "hi-res-fix" and the "stereo-hq-music" fix were officially released by Obsidian in the meantime.
So, you definitly should take TSRP into account, as noone would judge e.g. GOTHIC 3 by the state in came "outta teh box" (without any patches).
Role-Player said:Sir_Brennus said:Well, technically TSLRP is not a "mod" but a "unsupported patch" - which is totally different to Co8 5.0.
Neither is officially supported by their respective publishers.
TSLR does NOT add anything to the game that wasn't in there for a start. Best proof is that parts of TSLRP are no longer needed as the "hi-res-fix" and the "stereo-hq-music" fix were officially released by Obsidian in the meantime.
I mentioned unsupported and unofficial patches and modifications, not modifications exclusively. Circle of Eight makes fixes and additions, the Restoration Project (supposedly) is only a patch. Either of them are unsupported and not official in any way. Does this mean they shouldn't be considered? No, but it means that we'd be judging a game which may or may not correspond to the the end user's experience, and that we'd be reviewing two separate bodies of work - the developers and the communities' work. We reviewed Temple of Elemental Evil and Vampire: Bloodlines as they were released unto the public, and that's how it should remain. The efforts of Circle of Eight and the Bloodlines community are appreciated, but we're reviewing games made by the developers - not their communities.
So, you definitly should take TSRP into account, as noone would judge e.g. GOTHIC 3 by the state in came "outta teh box" (without any patches).
You haven't read many mainstream Gothic 3 reviews, have you?
Volourn said:"So, you definitly should take TSRP into account"
Give me a fuckin' break. Every game has cut content. KOTOR1 also had an entire planet cut. TSRP is NOT official content. It's cut content. It's not part of the game package that Obsidian/LA was sel.ling. It's a user added mod/patch. No different than any other game that has user added stuff in it.
Nobody with a soul and brains should use it when reviewing KOTOR2. It's just plain retarded.
"KotOR2 = quite stable but mutilated content due to publisher restrictions."
Every game has fuckin' publisher restrictions. Every game has fuckin' cuts.
"I personally think that you treat Obsidian unjustly, considering the above circumstances."
I personally KNOW that you are trying to give Obsidian/KOTOR2 an unjust advantage consideirng the above circumstances - most likely because you are an Obsidian Dicksucker.
Sir_Brennus said:I personally think that you treat Obsidian unjustly, considering the above circumstances.
Volourn said:"Move over to Team Gizka and ASK them if they add ADDITIONAL content. They will deny it. They don't lie. You do. Meh."
I dodn't care if they added 'new' stuff or not. Bottom line this is stuff that isn't in the released version of the game no more than the cut planet and the removed ending(s0 of KOTOR1 are. Yup, that's right. KOTOR1 (again) had a cut planet AND cut endings.
I say tough. If it's not in the game, it shouldn't be reviewed as part of the game. Period.
"You are a Bioware dicksucker."
That must explain why I never tell people they should review the NWN OC with user made content in mind, or even KOTOR1. Not to mention I find KOTOR1 mehish, haven't played two BIO games, and find SOU overrated. Or the fact I rate the NWN1 OC an AMAZING 75%ish
Seriously, dudette, you are an idiot.