Amon Gesoto said:Well it ain't Baldur's Gate, that's for damn sure.
Edward_R_Murrow said:Amon Gesoto said:Well it ain't Baldur's Gate, that's for damn sure.
Really now? Sure, mages were broken as could be if you knew how to abuse them, but every class could easily shine. Shadows of Amn was pretty well balanced, at least in comparison to other contemporaries like Fallout, Arcanum, or such.
Xor said:I found most battles in the original Baldur's Gate to be really, really easy - with the exception of the last fight, that I couldn't win without resorting to pseudo-cheating (hurling fireballs from across the room so they can't see you is hardly what I'd call fair).
Xor said:V:tmB had pretty balanced combat. None of the methods of attacking (disciplines, melee, or guns) were overwhelmingly good, and while disciplines sucked against most of the bosses you could still make due with some other weapon.
And look how much unbalancing stuff did they take out!NiM82 said:Oblivion, everyone's on the same level!
NiM82 said:Oblivion, everyone's on the same level!
Jeff Graw said:NiM82 said:Oblivion, everyone's on the same level!
Correct! end of discussion, end of thread.
Binary said:To the OP, please define "balanced" before someone comes in here screaming "Fallout!", "PS:T!" as so many do during any "what's the best XYZ" topic
kkthxbye
Thalkirst said:ToEE, IMHO.
I agree with your answer. I didn't think it was too tough at all, just made you be careful. Way too many people pissed and moaned about the challenge though, was just right to me.Ander Vinz said:My answer:
Gothic 2: Night of the Raven.