Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

What is the appeal of games about things you can do IRL?

Cassidy

Arcane
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
7,922
Location
Vault City
Secretninja said:
In life, it's much easier to be a loser than to win when compared to any game

There are several opinionated conclusions to take from the matter:

- These games can be defined as dumbed down simulations of things that are more difficult at life and thus aren't scaled to the level of those who play such games instead of going through the significantly better and at the end more rewarding real experience. In other words, Dating Sims are to the real deal what Fallout 3 is to Fallout. People who simply want to "win" easily instead of growing skin and learning that life isn't about easy things can get in their utopian place with these games.

- The decline of gaming is consequence of a greater problem related to the greater decline of modern western societies as a whole.

- Advertising isn't that different from totalitarian propaganda except for the fact it has competition instead of being monopolistic. The effects are the same: average people end buying shit as good, and enjoying it.

- The definition of "fun" can be inculcated in mainstream society and people can be manipulated to consider what "The Man" wants for them to think that is fun as it, if such goal was profitable. For example, if enough suits began hyping a new "sports" of kicking in the nuts, it wouldn't take much more than some years for it to take off. Society as a whole is very easily manipulated.

- Future generations will become increasingly dumb on average compare to previous ones.

- Idiocracy. ITZ COMING.

- For every winner there must be millions of losers. Such is capitalism, and dumb people tend to end among the latter.

- You can't sell "luxury games". There is no way to sell "Ferraris" in the games market. Thus you must always cater to the largest demographics.

- Therefore, Mainstream Audience for Games that simulate things that aren't that hard in real life = Losers who fail not only at life but also in any game that requires more than 2 neurons to be played.
 

PorkaMorka

Arcane
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
5,090
Wii Fit is a scam / a way for fat people to pretend to exercise, without having to actually work hard and get fit.

But games like NHL or NFL games are pretty reasonable, aside from the next-gen implementation.

In theory you can play hockey, but it costs a lot of money and time.

And you can't really play American football at all, past a certain age, unless you are good at game.

A game simulating half court basketball with bad players might be a bit redundant, but otherwise there are a lot of sports that it's not exactly easy to play IRL.

(Personally I stopped playing sports games when they got too actiony, but I did like Unneccessary Roughness 95 or 96 which was a bit more simulationy.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom