Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Game News Wargame: Airland Battle runner up for worst title

Norfleet

Moderator
Joined
Jun 3, 2005
Messages
12,250
I don't think that was so much a judgement on the quality of the game as it was on the awfulness of the title. I wonder what the WORST title was.
 

MetalCraze

Arcane
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
21,104
Location
Urkanistan
am I the only one that things wargame is a brilliant game? sure, the UI shit but the gameplay is excellent.

Combat Mission series beat it hard any time.

Wargame has too much rockpaperscissoring, not enough tactical features.
Combat Mission is a great example of how realism beats using abstract balancing so you can't have same tricks solving all problems on the battlefield.

With CMSF2 which will have NATO fighting Russia being less than a year away there's not much point in this one.
 

Trash

Pointing and laughing.
Joined
Dec 12, 2002
Messages
29,683
Location
About 8 meters beneath sea level.
The first one? Wargame: European Escalation? I believe the consensus was that it was pretty good, especially multiplayer. Very much rock, paper, scissors but done quite well.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom