Probably the current owners think it's a good idea, since it will let them cash out.Well, it was fun, Paradox. I hoped you would do good. It seems those hopes are shattered.
I don't know who in their right mind thought this is a good idea? This is the shities thing I heard since Vietnam.
I imagine Swedish (((investors))) will heavily push the anti-European, anti-White, SJW angle in every Paradox game from here on. Avoid their games like the Red Death (pro-tip: you can't).
They already put out a "all women" DLC for Crusader Kings 2. Guess what? It was attacked because it was ahistorical, but the devs still defended it.
CK2 is complete anachronist garbage. Either go full retard and play The Sims Medieval or keep your monocle and play CK1.
They already put out a "all women" DLC for Crusader Kings 2. Guess what? It was attacked because it was ahistorical, but the devs still defended it.
They already put out a "all women" DLC for Crusader Kings 2. Guess what? It was attacked because it was ahistorical, but the devs still defended it.
Can you play as Eleanor of Aquitaine?
Someone need to retire to make beer.Couldn't they do what CDPR did with CD Projekt and basically own a certain percentage by key people within the company so they retain control over it? Or whatever that Potato setup was, I forgot.
Wester said:We also want to clarify that the principal shareholders (like myself and long time owners Spiltan Investment) in Paradox will remain principal shareholders and that only a small part of the company is in question for any future plans.