Fangshi said:
It was some sort of idol worshiped by her people and carried by the northern clans from the old kingdoms in the south. It was destroyed by the dwarves at the end of the Great War, a priceless treasure of her people destroyed by their ancient foe. She does not terribly care about its loss but her people do (particularly the priesthood).
And the Dream it had, what happened to the Dream?
Speaking of the priesthood, what plans does she have for them? Does she intend to rule her people through religion? Or does she intend to do away with them at some time in the future?
Fangshi said:
She has no quarrel with the Emperor and if he writes to her personally, as one sovereign to another, and asks for the release of all humans in her care then she will comply.
Writes her personally?
Admittedly, we are no politicians either, but how good a grasp on history between her people and Cath Bruig does she have?
Does she realize that the only thing that makes her different from all the other warleaders her people had are her own claims of being an Empress?
She would have to prove her right to be recognized as such to the rest of the world, not the other way around.
And Alric would never accept her claim to this land. Sorry, not going to happen. Not his fault her people have allied with the Dark every time an invasion was launched into the lands of man. If she thinks that a human Emperor would not want to have a buffer zone between them, she'd better think again, without emotions clouding her judgement.
The ghols are viewed as a threat, and the burden of proving otherwise lies with them, for they have done enough to earn their reputation.
Trying to wipe out a long standing ally of Cath Bruig does not really help that goal.
Fangshi said:
It is worth whatever it takes to make their lands and people free; to not have to live in fear of dwarven chariots pushing on through the dark; of the whips and knives of those vicious, little bastards; of their breeding pens and their slave markets; of losing sons, daughters, mothers, fathers to their 'hunting' expeditions.
It is worth the cost to put a final end to the dwarves and she has seen nothing to make her doubt that.
An excellent sentiment. Let's take a closer look at it.
Her people have been at it with the dwarves for several millenia at least, piling misery upon misery, corpses upon corpses. They have been trying to expel the dwarves from their lands for who knows how long, and what exactly do they have to show for it?
Let's take a good look at history, the greatest teacher of all, though some prefer to call it 'the sum total of things that could have been avoided'. Better, smarter, and stronger generals have tried to destroy the dwarves in that time, and every one of them failed. Balor have driven them off their lands, but they have returned stronger than before. Soulbligher tried to drive them away, and what have become of him? The resourses the archmages had at their disposkal were immense, and they still lost. What makes her think anything will be different now?
But that is not what is important right now. In every war with the Dark the dwarves have thrown their support behind the forces of Light, and thus in every war the ghols have sided with whoever fought against the Light at a time. They have willingly reduced themselves to fodder for the Leveller and the Falled Lords. They have stooped to the level of Myrkridia and the undead. Was it the dwarves that did it to them? No, they have done so out of their own free will, seduced by the promises of greatness and power that would allow them to take revenge on their enemies.
You know the curious thing about power and greatness? They can never be
given by anyone, they have to be earned, else they are just fakes that could be stripped away as easily as they were granted. Her people forgot that simple truth more times than they had the right to. No one in their right mind would follow the Fallen. When did it ever do anyone good? Has she forgotten what happened to Myrkridia who were used and armed by Moagim much as the ghols were by Balor? They were wiped out to the last female and pup. Has she forgotten what happened to Myrmidons? No one has ever seen them after the Balor's fall. Has she forgotten what happened to those who chose to follow the Watcher, or to those who served the Thin White Mage? Those were dead even before we took mercy on them and freed their souls.
Is that the future she wants to see for her people? Because when she says that destroying the dwarves is 'worth whatever it takes', that is what comes to mind. She can't even claim that it can not happen, or have never happened - because her people have beein doin exactly that for the last 60 years, bowing before archmages who promised to give them the means to destroy their 'oppressors'. Hell, a mere month ago she was an unwilling servant to the Watcher because her husband has sold their clan into an eternal slavery in an attempt to squeeze any little advantage he could over his enemies and rivals! No doubt, he, too, thought that it would be 'worth whatever it takes'.
Has she really seen
nothing that would make her question the cost? Because then she would have to be blind.
But where did their faithful service leave them? What is the place of her people in the world? They are but one step away from being considered irredeemable abominations on par with undead. The dwarves and the Forest Giants kill them on sight. The fir'Borg have no real love for anyone, but the ghols have probably pissed them off as well after the Dark consumed the Province and got close to Ermine. The only other races in the world that consider them sentient and not inherently abhorrent are the Trow (who probably just don't care), the mauls (who aren't in a position to judge, after being allied to the Soulblighter), and humans - and our goodwill is quickly wearing thin. I mean, there is only so much you can attribute to mistakes before you are forced to admit that maybe the ghols
are predisposed to being servants of the Dark, seeing how they unerringly end up in bed with it.
And they have suffered for being gullible fools that they were. They suffered when Alric pushed against Balor and Myrgard was retaken, with every ghol in it slain; they suffered when the Soulblighter was crushed, and if we didn't show up when we did, they would have paid full price for having trusted the Watcher as well, regardless of whether the archmage won of lost. It is a miracle they have not shared the fates of Myrkridia and Myrmidons yet, but they are making great strides towards it with each passing century. They already are at a state where it is considered 'acceptable' for everyone to kill them.
"Like I said, everyone tries to murder us. That is nothing special, your peoples have always done so and always will do so but we will win in the end. A murdered clan here or there hardly warrants vengeance."
Well, guess what, it is not 'normal'. It is a result of what her people
chose to become.
Did the dwarves do that to them? Or is there a limit to blaming their own fuck-ups on someone else?
So we would have to ask again - is it worth dooming her people to extinction or servitude in order to get rid of the dwarves? She wants for them 'to not have to live in fear', but the road she is leading them towards will have them stop living, first.
For the first time in a long while - maybe in an eon - the ghols have become free of the influence of others. They have someone else of their own kind to rally behind, they have their own ideas for their future, not something that some archmage or the other have planned for them. This may be their opportunity to change their destiny, to achieve something they haven't before. And she wants to squander it on what they have always been doing, on a pointless fight that has been going for ages with no end in sight, the very same fight that drove them to ally with the Dark and brought them to the miserable state they are in now?
Does she even realize what she is to her people?
There are not many who would consider a gholish Empire seriously before reaching out for torches and pitchforks. If the ghols fail to become anything else than what they have been so far even with the best of them in the lead, then there is truly no hope for them. It is a small miracle that we are having this conversation now. If a similar situation ever arise again sometime in the future, her successor will no longer have a benefit of doubt she had. She is literally the first and last chance her people have.
Does she want to spend this chance trying to break her head over a brick wall when there is a two thousands years worth of proof that nothing good ever came out of it - not for the ghols, not for the dwarve, not even for the Fallen Lords, it seems? Does she want to do the same thing again - and expect that something would change this time? Does she know the definition of insanity?
Or is she willing to admit that there may be another way?
Has she ever wondered what will happen to them if she is ever taken out of the picture - slain, captured, betrayed, or hell, even dies of old age? If she continued going down the road her people have followed for centuries, then what would stop them from falling to the old habits? It is what they do, and it does not appear that history ever taught them anything, seeing how they were eager to jump the Wather's bones a mere year after the Soulblighter's defeat. You can't even claim they forgot anything - it simply went over their heads! So the moment she is not here, they will - inevitably - run to the next mage willing to promise them the bright future instead of working hard for it. Who is out there that they didn't bow to yet after Shiver, Balor, Soulblighter, and the Watcher? The Deceiver? The Faceless One? No, that is the one who started the mess in the first place. Damn, that list is getting short!
Does that not concern her at all?
We are going to put it bluntly. She is at a crossroads where she can choose to try and save her people, or try to destroy the dwarves - but not both. She will have to choose what is more important to her.
Trying to destroy the dwarves is not something we would allow. It is not something Alric would allow. If she falls in battle, the future of her people will be sealed as they will regress back to being fodder in the games of higher beings. If her conquest fails, her rivals who do not understand the trap her people have fallen into will tear her apart. If she ,anages to conquer the kingdom, then she is looking at a war with Cath Bruig, as they would rightfully see the ghols as a vanguard of the Dark - as they have always been, - and even if they aren't, that's what they
will become after her death. We've seen that before. If she somehow survives
that, her people would become locked in the opposition to the Cath Bruig, and when the time comes, they will side with the Dark. Unless, of course, they manage to defeat Alric and ruin Cath Bruig. Then they will
become the Dark.
There are no winners on that path. Her people will never know independence, always serving as a piece in someone else's game. It is a hopeless battle where each victory mires her kind even deeper in a bog that she hoped to help them escape in the first place.
She has to ask herself, does the future of her people really depend on what happens to the dwarves? Since when did she let the dwarves define what her people are?
Fangshi said:
A white ghôl with pink eyes. The legends claim he fought with a stone spear and a shield of dwarf flesh. He led the charge to war, carrying the message from clan to clan and calling together all of the elders to a conclave to determine the correct course of action.
Laugh maniacally. And applaud.
Fucker.
Yes, the more we hear, the more we believe that if was the doing of a Fallen Lord. We can only guess the motives, but there is a chance that an endless supply of cheap bodies for the Dark was one of them. If so, they have succeeded wonderfully.
Fangshi said:
"It- it would make a difference to me... If my people have been used for thousands of years it would make a difference to me but I do not think it would matter much to my people."
Would it now? She knows for a fact that her people were used by the archmages as expendable troops, even without knowing whether or not one of them instigated the conflict. They were using them freely for years, and her people readily offered their services.
Why would knowing about who made the first push make a difference if everyone is perfectly happy with how things are now?
Or is she not happy?
Fangshi said:
"Even if they are innocent of that first slaughter they are not innocent in the eyes of my people, I..."
No one is innocent. No one could stay innocent in a meatgrinder that went on for millenia. The ghols have done their share of deprived deeds,
on top of allying with the forces out to destroy the world. They should be the last to speak of the guilt of others.
But if a mistake is realized, it needs to be corrected. It is bad enough to perpetuate the cycle of hatred unwittingly, but doing so while fully aware of it is a crime before both of their people.
It boggles the mind to think that the number of souls dead to this conflict may be more than of those who are still alive. Someone has to stop this.
Fangshi said:
When she finally does answer it is to say that she does not believe she can end the conflict. She does not believe her people would accept anything but total victory for their Empress.
Her people have accepted a lot of far more questionable deals lately. *nod at her necklace*
We never let the fact that the dwarves won't accept our alliance stand in its way, did we? We are trying to pursue a course that we think would be best for both people, quite often without them knowing about it - and so far it worked out splendidly... mostly. Why can't she do the same?
Fangshi said:
If the dwarves were willing to free all their slaves, if they were willing to surrender all claim to ghôlish land and if they were barred entrance into ghôlish lands for five generations (long enough for her peoples' hatred to cool) then perhaps there could be peace between her people and their enemies, perhaps...
She should be able to look at the history of the dwarven kingdom and see for herself that they were content to sit on their butts, build up, and ignore the ghols (since they never tried to expand their kingdom), while it always were the ghols who were preoccupied with the return of their 'ancestral lands'. The dwarves have nowhere to return to, that is the only land they have, and they will not - can not - leave it. Only the ghols can.
If she is really interested in finding an alternative, she should learn to discern between what is possible and what is not. Only after that would we be able to start making steps towards that direction.
Five generations of her people mean nothing to the dwarves, as not a single generation will pass among them. And there is no guarantee that her heir - if she even manages to conceive a heir in these dangerous times and if they manage to retain the rights to the throne among all the power-hungry clans who do not have her foresight - that her heir would share her ideas or beliefs. The prospects of her people not dissolving back into a chaotic mess after her death are very slim indeed.
No, if such a thing is to be made possible, it will have to be carefully planned in advance and carried out in person over several hundreds of years, hundreds of years of lying and mischief as neither her people, nor the dwarves fully understand the ramifications of the conflict between them, or its reasons.
As luck would have it, we have managed to obtain a secret of eternal youth. With it, she can realize her visions for her people without fear of them being corrupted after she passes away of old age, as she would be able to eternally guide them until such a time she would wish to step back - provided she is not killed, of course. She really is the best chance her people have... but we will not give it away just for her to wage another war.
Again, she will have to choose: either to lead her people down a new path they haven't tried before and hope it works out, or assure their mutual destruction with the dwarves - if that.
We will have to let her think about it for a while.