Realbumpbert
Liturgist
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2003
- Messages
- 197
Maybe, maybe not. My stance is that there are no intrinsic differences between magic and technology; if, however, magic required less knowledge and resources, I expect the revolution would occur sooner. Conversely, if magic required large amounts of study and hideous costs, then it would occur at a later date.Wysardry said:Okay, if you want to oversimplify things and think of technology and magic as being equal, consider this: the Industrial Revolution didn't start until the 18th Century. It would therefore follow that a Magical Revolution would take place at a similar time, rather than 300 to 800 years sooner.
There is no line between modern and ancient. Magic could exist in a medieval society if technology could, which it did.Also, if a Magical Revolution did take place, there would no longer be a medieval society, so most of the features that people enjoy in fantasy games would be missing. Castles became increasingly pointless as gunpowder became more widespread for example, and they would be a complete waste of resources if the enemy could just teleport past the walls.
No, I was not thinking of his quote, nor was I talking about any juxtaposition. I was just saying that tech and magic are two approaches to the same concept.If you're thinking of the famous quote by Arthur C Clarke (any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic), the two most important words are "sufficiently advanced". We are not yet sufficiently advanced in this century to replicate the effects of most spells available in fantasy games, so any juxtaposition of magic and technology would require a much more advanced society.