GarfunkeL
Racism Expert
Getting close to the climax!
GarfunkeL said:Getting close to the climax!
laclongquan said:Oh, I entirely agree that there's good chance the minions wont find the traps. And very good chance that Donnie will survive the torture. But it's unpleasant to see my pessimistic expectations come into being.
Your idea 1 go closely with my plan also. The difference is that I still give a large share of credit to Eames. Erika receive hers, meaning that reflect toward Kirkberg, And Eames receive hers. NO ONE receive most of credit to ensure the balance of power wont be tipped too heavily into either side and the losers wont get too mad at us.
Kz3r0 said:Actually my problem with Eames' plan is that expose us too much for too little gain, without mentioning the sheriff's dumping.
So what I suggest is to negotiate with Eames more favorable options for us and try to preserve the sheriff's position, supporting the prince will do us no good.
Undead Phoenix said:I have to tip my hat to grunker, he creates an atmosphere with relatively few words. That's a skill and a half that is.
Esquilax said:I'm curious as to why some posters (i.e. Lord Andre, SCO) chose B instead. Why disagree with Eames openly? Not saying it's a dumb idea, just curious. Doesn't seem prudent to show your cards during a poker game. Honesty is a bad idea in a game of plots and schemes. Based on what the Regentia said, I'm assuming that her first step in the plan to strip Kirkbeck of his power will be to have us make a public statement, so she's relying on us to initiate things. I've got two ideas for this:
Esquilax said:I'm curious as to why some posters (i.e. Lord Andre, SCO) chose B instead. Why disagree with Eames openly? Not saying it's a dumb idea, just curious. Doesn't seem prudent to show your cards during a poker game. Honesty is a bad idea in a game of plots and schemes. Based on what the Regentia said, I'm assuming that her first step in the plan to strip Kirkbeck of his power will be to have us make a public statement, so she's relying on us to initiate things. I've got two ideas for this:
Now that is a strange logic you use there. Very strange logic. Or better to say, illogic.Lord Andre said:Saying no to her face would probably make her respect us more.
Saying yes(even if it's a lie) will put us in the puppet zone. No one takes you seriously when you're in the puppet zone, not even your own men.
Lord Andre said:Also consider this: When is a tremere baroness more likely to have you killed:
a) when you say no to her plan and remain neutral ?
b) or when you double-cross her after asking and receiving her help ?
Lord Andre said:The question, as I see it, is: do we want to play a king in the making or a pawn ? Where's the famed ventrue presence ? The charisma that moves kine and kin alike. All I see is - Yes maam '! Thank you maam' ! Will you blood bound me now, I can't wait to be your water boy !
We started as equal partners with her and I don't see why that should change. At least play hard to get until she actually puts an offer on the table, not empty promises based on ifs and maybes. If we back down every time the possibility of violence occurs than what can we hope to accomplish ?
Alexandre the Great said: Fortune favors the bold ! and he was a true ventrue.
So, to summarise yet another rant, it's all about having balls.
wjw said:I prefer B over D. I don't want to pussy through the entire story