Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Game News KOTOR wins again, and again, and again...

Voss

Erudite
Joined
Jun 25, 2003
Messages
1,770
So, if you don't mind my asking, where do you draw the line between things that you feel need to be in the game to give it depth and meaning, and the need for the game to be successful in the broader market?

Are there certain ideas and concepts that you feel absolutely need to be be in a game, and that you are willing to fight to keep them in, regardless of the pressure from other departments/people? And what would you, in general, feel to be essential ideas?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom