I'd actually assume Robot A to notice 170 != 150 and answer: "No, I have 170 Maga Hats."It's not vague, if you deal in logic.
Let me put it this way.
Someone gives Robot A 170 Maga Hats.
Then Robot B passes by. It asks Robot A: "do you own 150 Maga Hats?"
Robot A would definitely answer: "Yes!".
(using a button, obviously)
Not a smart one, but a correct one nonetheless. He does need 150 meals. He actually needs more, but that doesn't make the first statement untrue.I'd actually assume Robot A to notice 170 != 150 and answer: "No, I have 170 Maga Hats."It's not vague, if you deal in logic.
Let me put it this way.
Someone gives Robot A 170 Maga Hats.
Then Robot B passes by. It asks Robot A: "do you own 150 Maga Hats?"
Robot A would definitely answer: "Yes!".
(using a button, obviously)
Rephrasing it doesn't change the fact that the natural language statement 'I have x things' is vague as to the distinction between 'at least x' and 'exactly x' before being translated into a formal statement, as would be required in mathematics or set theory.
But if you like examples, try this one:
Donald Trump wants to celebrate his birthday with a yuge party, the best party and invites all his 170 friends. He calls McDonald's to order the catering. The McD employee asks: "Do you need 150 meals?"
Would 'YES!' be a smart final answer?
Autism unbound.I'd actually assume Robot A to notice 170 != 150 and answer: "No, I have 170 Maga Hats."It's not vague, if you deal in logic.
Let me put it this way.
Someone gives Robot A 170 Maga Hats.
Then Robot B passes by. It asks Robot A: "do you own 150 Maga Hats?"
Robot A would definitely answer: "Yes!".
(using a button, obviously)
Rephrasing it doesn't change the fact that the natural language statement 'I have x things' is vague as to the distinction between 'at least x' and 'exactly x' before being translated into a formal statement, as would be required in mathematics or set theory.
But if you like examples, try this one:
Donald Trump wants to celebrate his birthday with a yuge party, the best party and invites all his 170 friends. He calls McDonald's to order the catering. The McD employee asks: "Do you need 150 meals?"
Would 'YES!' be a smart final answer?
If this post receives 150 brofists.
I think the buttons made brofist alot more valuable resource, and earning them is alot harder.
To earn brofist was quite an effort, that (at least in majority of the case) only real posts contribute to relevant discussion, or a worthy news or something will earn a brofist.
Other low effort post, trolling post, jokes (even a good joke), snarky comments, puns and jests usually get funny buttons instead of brofist.
Of course the system still arent perfect, but it oversaturating the forum with worthless but relevant buttons actually increase the value of actual reputation system we have because it simply distill which posts are really button worthy, and those who are funny, amusing, entertaining, but ultimately don't add anything to the discussion.
I would let the main RPG forums have buttons back, but keep some of public library like the gif topic/image topic which sole reason are quick entertainment brofist only.
Yes, but it's de-activable autismAutism unbound.
Where the FUCK is the merry christmas button??????!????