Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

How moddable will AoD's skill system be?

Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
6,207
Location
The island of misfit mascots
One concern I, and quite a few others, have is that AoD's skill system will be so harsh that the only real character choices end up being those made in char-gen (make a sneaky character, must then take the sneaky option each time, talky can only get through the talky path, etc).

Now I'm not posting to re-argue that. I understand that this is a deliberate design choice by VD (though he would no doubt disagree that it restricts choices to char-gen), and that it's a creative decision, not an error.

What I'd like to know is whether the skill system is going to be mod-friendly? I don't mean adding or changing skills, but tweaking of the numbers, as for skill-points gain and skill-checks. To some extent, that might be the kind of thing that can be tweaked just by editing an ini file here or there.

If so, I suspect there will be mods that open the game up to those wanting more of a FO experience. By that, I mean the way that FO quite deliberately set the skill-checks to be relatively easy, so that instead of 'sneaky character must always take sneaky option', there's:
- 'sneaky character can do this quest most easily using the sneaky option'
- ....but if he has invested a few points in speech (not enough to be a 'talky build', just so the character isn't a stuttering mess), he can take another option that is overall slightly worse, but has its uses if the player is pursuing a particular strategy (say, a particular item, or opens a different gamepath).
- ....or, if the player has an excellent grasp of the combat tactics, spends on potions/equipment, and is stubborn enough to save-scum a bit, he can still take the combat option (which would be the 'easy option' for a combat build). Definitely the least efficient path for that character, but it's available if you just really want to kill that NPC.

Making this easily tweakable (outside of the game) could provide a means of widening the audience to people who are still very keen crpg-players, but who are looking for a slightly different experience to that on offer - without having to compromise your own design.
 

t

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Aug 24, 2008
Messages
1,303
Codex 2014 PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Serpent in the Staglands Divinity: Original Sin Torment: Tides of Numenera Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire
There are console commands to cheat your stats up, but honestly, I've seen builds with not more than 3 points invested into all of the combat stats together that won all the fights at the arena, so the harshness really is a function of how well you understand the systems.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom