Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Dragon Age Dragon Age: Origins is ten years old today

The Bishop

Cipher
Joined
Oct 18, 2012
Messages
359
DA:O was the last great Bioware game and it's setting and writing were good for a videogame. It's one of the last games and RPGs which were progressive and not woke. Even if it has some subtle hints of what became woke later. It has an isometric view and a party of 4 with a silent protagonist. I don't hate voice-acting and cutscenes provided they're good and DA:O voice-acting was great. MMO combat could've been implemented better and improved upon but alas. An amount of the DA:O trash combat is the biggest thing which hurts replayability.
Bioware wasn't that good with a videogame plot except BG2. Their strength was always great and larger-than-life characters and DA:O has them in abundance. For example, the Cousland massacre is a ripoff of the ASOIAF Red Wedding and as others already mentioned Gaider and others were obviously inspired by ASOIAF. Gaider and other DA:O writers were last RPG writers who read the literature and fantasy unlike modern narrative designers who only watch the movies and TV shows.
DA:O sure has some pozzed moments like a sob story of Avelline - the first female knight who was killed by evil patriarchy but you could always roleplay an authentic medieval aristocrat not caring about peasants with Human and Dwarf Noble origins. Leliana and Zevran are bisexual and romanceable but Leliana is feminine and is straight for all intents and purposes unless you court her as a woman and her lesbian tryst with her mentor is only hinted at.
Vault Dweller in his Codex review liked C&C and reactivity in DA:O with an example of a Redcliffe quest with so many permutations and reactivity.
One other point about DA:O writing that is often overlooked and underappreciated is that it's functional. Videogame writing is supposed to underpin gameplay. It's supposed to give you reasons to care about going into this dungeon or looking for this item other than "I need to trigger the quest node" or "I need to farm xp/gold/materials". At no point in DA:O you feel like you just pushing forward for the sake of doing it. There is always a convincing reason why your character should care about whatever it is you're doing right now, how this thing resulted from that other thing before it. The writing isn't super deep, super original, or super groundbreaking. But it works. It ties in all the strands of gameplay into a thing that can be reasonably construed as adventure.

This is in stark contrast with pretty much everything Bioware put out since. And it's not just Bioware. For some reason stories that work in most basic sense have become very rare beasts in videogames. As a player you know that you're completing quests and consuming content, and the game doesn't try to convince you otherwise.
 

Absinthe

Arcane
Joined
Jan 6, 2012
Messages
4,062
The funny part is that Manson's song is actually a critique of mindlessly pursuing shiny, edgy new shit.
 

9ted6

Educated
Joined
Mar 24, 2023
Messages
570
Origins was boring and uninspired but it was better than the newer games and better in terms of story and characters than its contemporaries. At least its NPCs were mostly tolerable unlike Twitcher.

I wonder how it ended up being okay though, because come to find out Gaider wrote two prequel novels leading up to the game's release and they sucked, had some of the material we now associate with the later games, like some terrible Whedonesque dialogue. Yet Origins, somehow, is pretty much fine and the novels are irrelevant to anything going on in it.
 

Lacrymas

Arcane
Joined
Sep 23, 2015
Messages
18,029
Pathfinder: Wrath
Origins in an acquired taste imo. I found it extremely boring when I played it for the first time too and couldn't get past Lothering, so I didn't touch it for a while but then tried it again at one point due to a recommendation iirc and it clicked with me when I finished Lothering. It's not anything special by any means, but it's Bioware's last RPG and at that time Bioware were at least competent and were just less good at the worst of times, as opposed to actively bad post ME1.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2023
Messages
3,160
Origins in an acquired taste imo. I found it extremely boring when I played it for the first time too and couldn't get past Lothering, so I didn't touch it for a while but then tried it again at one point due to a recommendation iirc and it clicked with me when I finished Lothering. It's not anything special by any means, but it's Bioware's last RPG and at that time Bioware were at least competent and were just less good at the worst of times, as opposed to actively bad post ME1.
Being able to zoom out and program your character's behaviors (seriously, the tactics screen was a neat thing) numbed the pain. But I think DA2 is less retarded than ME2.
 

Sacibengala

Prophet
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
1,106
Thanks DA:O for inspiring the worst parts in BG3.
I don't remember a gay druid bear sex while transgender tieflings watch scene in DAO, but it's been a while.
They had to expand it a little in the kinkyness somehow to make it worthy of 2023 sensibilities. But in Origins you still have a tanned elf that hits on you all the time. In BG3 he is pale and try to *SPOILER ALERT* suck you while you sleep, though.
 

9ted6

Educated
Joined
Mar 24, 2023
Messages
570
Thanks DA:O for inspiring the worst parts in BG3.
I don't remember a gay druid bear sex while transgender tieflings watch scene in DAO, but it's been a while.
you can get in an orgy though. BG3 is seriously lacking in the group sex design.
At least that orgy requires you to recruit a scummy companion and turn the other one evil.

In BG3 the gay trans-bear orgies and elf cucking activities consist of supposedly good guys. You got elves trying to suck you in your sleep now apparently.
 
Last edited:

sebas

Scholar
Patron
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Messages
286
Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut
I know it's panned nowadays, here at least, but I really enjoyed DAO back then. The Fade, the Darkspawn, the City of Gold, the Qunari, Blood Magic, the different prologues and I remember I liked how the elves were portrayed (after having played The Witcher beforehand). I also really appreciated the party tactics menu, it was exactly what was missing from my Infinity games (not the limited rests or auto-healing mr. Sawyer). I also remember Allistair was incredibly annoying but I liked Lelliana and the Enchantment! family.

Yeah, the game had its flaws: the deep roads, morrigan looking like a crack whore, the camera, the lack of balance and quite a few others.

But looking back at it, it's definitely a game made by game developers and not by game companies. Take the intro: they put in the effort to give you a proper race specific backstory that was immersive and in line with the overarching story whereas in a much bigger and more expensive DAI even as an elf or a qunary you just happen to be there as a member of the fucking Chantry (ie. the fucking nazzi).

DAO was a new universe, a proper one. Not fucking Starfield. I don't know that any western AAA game company nowadays would invest so much in a new IP.
 

Modron

Arcane
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
10,058
I know 2009 was a very dead year for crpgs but there was zero reason to pick this over KotC or even Risen.
 

Space Satan

Arcane
Vatnik
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
6,242
Location
Space Hell
If you want to bash Dragon Age: Oriigins then compare it with RPGs of 2009, when it released. Things will be a bit clearer why it became so popular so well recieved
 

The Jester

Cipher
Joined
Mar 1, 2020
Messages
1,492
Edgy as fuck, but it got my 15 year old self hyped


I unironically enjoy this song.
8aa.gif
 

Delterius

Arcane
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
15,956
Location
Entre a serra e o mar.

Mauman

Learned
Joined
Jun 30, 2021
Messages
935
I know 2009 was a very dead year for crpgs but there was zero reason to pick this over KotC or even Risen.
the world wasn't ready for turn hot stinky garbage, thankfully we now have bg3 (tb dragon age)
i hate proper D&D
sad!

thankfully sven has proven computers are too developed now and we don't have to lower ourselves to RTwP no more
If, by proper D&D, you mean the dumbed down sludge that is 5E, then yes, I hate "proper" D&D.

But it's more the writing of BG3 I despise more than anything.
 

Mauman

Learned
Joined
Jun 30, 2021
Messages
935

Delterius

Arcane
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
15,956
Location
Entre a serra e o mar.
I'm also a 2E connoisseur.
oh yeah the crpgs where you 1) pick class 2) pick weapon theres your build voilá congratulations thereyago you'vedunit the game is over now now thats proper D&D compared to 5E where you coincidentially do the same thing
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom