Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Design of party movement outside of combat

OttoQuitmarck

Educated
Joined
Aug 1, 2023
Messages
295
So I'm working on a party-based 2D CRPG (in a similar style to Dark Sun: Shattered Lands) and I was wondering what you guys' opinion is on how other party members should be able to move outside of combat. If they should just not appear on the map at all and only appear whenever combat starts, or if it should be possible to move each individual party member around on the map outside of combat like Baldur's gate, or if they should just always follow the main player character a bit like in JRPGs or the recent Kingsvein I believe (I only looked at screenshots so I might be wrong). Each of these options has quite a lot of implications for the overall game, and especially level design so it's something I want to decide on early on and not have any regrets about, ideally.

For the record, the plan is obviously that IN combat the various party members will be able to move separately in each of their respective turns. And if they can't move separately outside of combat they would just automatically move into/behind the player once combat is over. Even if they *can* move separately the idea is still to have the "follow the player" design by default and the user would need to actively decide to want to move characters separately.
 

MRY

Wormwood Studios
Developer
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
5,717
Location
California
Heavily driven by gameplay considerations (e.g., whether individual party members can sneak or place traps, whether combat and exploration happen on the same map such that you can position party members pre-combat), aesthetic considerations (is the exploration mode meant to be relatively "realistic" such that it's bizarre not to see the followers), and somewhat driven by narrative conventions (to what extent does one character have primacy over the others, to what extent are followers "characters" whose presence should be visually respected). Impossible question to answer in a vacuum.

All else being equal, they should be visible but should not obstruct movement.
 

OttoQuitmarck

Educated
Joined
Aug 1, 2023
Messages
295
Heavily driven by gameplay considerations (e.g., whether individual party members can sneak or place traps, whether combat and exploration happen on the same map such that you can position party members pre-combat), aesthetic considerations (is the exploration mode meant to be relatively "realistic" such that it's bizarre not to see the followers), and somewhat driven by narrative conventions (to what extent does one character have primacy over the others, to what extent are followers "characters" whose presence should be visually respected). Impossible question to answer in a vacuum.

All else being equal, they should be visible but should not obstruct movement.
Hmmmm alright.
 

Saint_Proverbius

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
11,926
Location
Behind you.
Even if they *can* move separately the idea is still to have the "follow the player" design by default and the user would need to actively decide to want to move characters separately.
In cities or places you want to have combat that can happen at any given moment, you probably should have them being separate from the main character and on the screen together. However, you can always save yourself some trouble and just have a single icon for the entire party in the overworld. Lots of games do this.
 

OttoQuitmarck

Educated
Joined
Aug 1, 2023
Messages
295
Even if they *can* move separately the idea is still to have the "follow the player" design by default and the user would need to actively decide to want to move characters separately.
In cities or places you want to have combat that can happen at any given moment, you probably should have them being separate from the main character and on the screen together. However, you can always save yourself some trouble and just have a single icon for the entire party in the overworld. Lots of games do this.
Yea makes sense. Hmmm. It does seem like a lot of extra work/needed QA to implement it like this, however.
 

Saint_Proverbius

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
11,926
Location
Behind you.
Yea makes sense. Hmmm. It does seem like a lot of extra work/needed QA to implement it like this, however.
Fallout did it this way, now that I think about it. You can have a party of four people walking around in the towns and in random encounters, but your whole party is just a triangle on the map screen. It just depends on how abstract you want the party icon on the overworld map.
 

Dorateen

Arcane
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
4,381
Location
The Crystal Mist Mountains
If you go with the Party Leader approach, whether represented by a single icon or the other characters tagging along, the Player should be able to swap out/select a different character to be the party leader, as needed.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2016
Messages
1,937
A really good question that I have wondered about myself.



I don't have want I want but I want this feel. That is some jank, which is what I want. For that I use an arrive with separation behaviour. Companions cannot traverse all geometry therefore they can get stuck. They will appear alongside you when combat begins though.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom