Shit, you still don't get what i'm talking about. The sites you mention don't have anything in common with a book (in terms of layout/design).
Because the book layout/design is restrictive! Isn't that exactly why you're complaining about it?
If you want to convert it to something optimized for reading on a PC/Cellphone, that offers more/bigger screenshots, ribbons, interviews, FAQ, shitton of links and what not, you have to change the design - especially since it has to be resizeable to multiple resolutions, etc.
Case in point, Hardcore Gaming 101. Just see
their Ultima sections. They have much more text than I can have, the box art, tons of screenshots and even compare multiple version, and interview with Lord British, quick links to the rest of the series and similar games, etc... that's "the sky is the limit" in full motion.
And here's the twist - despite all that, they are slowly publishing everything from the website into books - including pdfs. And people are loving it, it's attracting new audiences and they give them $1,000 a month on
their Patreon just for that.
I'm not a professional web designer, but even i know that there are some cool, cheap and easy-to-use web layouts, perfect for creating a site in a book format.
I'm not talking about doing a site about cRPGs, but just transcribing the book to a website. And yeah it costs money, but it can be cheap as fuck with some help - so that isn't a valid reason for 'not even thinking about it' stance you took.
Of course it is, because I'm the one who have to do all this "simple things".
The whole concept behind the book was also very simple - get people to write brief reviews about some important RPGs. A breeze, right? Yet here we are, three years later...
Also, name me a famous & popular "site in book format" - preferably one created by "cheap and easy-to-use web layouts".
I get it that you like the book format for the web version, but it's impossible that i'm the first person you encounter, that says something like: 'physical books are great, e-books are great, but going with interactive (bookmarks, hyperlinks) straight-up pdf is inferior to other methods you could go with'.
Yes, you are.
All people ever asked me was for hyperlinks - which I'm adding on the next release.
Pdf version really carries the same weight and is as meaningful as the physical book, in your opinion? (And again, i'm not talking about throwing the pdf version to the garbage)
Not the same, but much more than a website.
You're not a professional web designer, but I graduated in Marketing and worked for 10 years in advertisement. And, believe me, perception of value works in very abstract ways. Modern journalism is having a really hard time with this because people simply don't value webpages - reading a magazine on the store without buying it is considered bad, but surfing websites with adblockers is a-ok.
There's also what I mentioned previously - the sense that everything you need is finite and finished, contained in one properly curated book/magazine/pdf. If you go to a news website you'll get the highlights but also a nearly-endless amount of content from other days, weeks, subjects, etc. That's overwhelming - people like weekly news magazines because it gives them the big news of the week they should know about, plus some stuff they can read or just skim based on their interest - and this is key - you can't skim a website.
And people love skimming. It's something vital in a project like this - very few will sit down and read all the entries in chronological order, and even these people will probably skim it before, flipping through the pages until a cool screenshot or a game they know/were curious about catches their eye.
There is even an option, with no work or money needed, of putting the pdf file on a site that allows annotations/comments made by you or the authors (or anyone you want).
It's so fucking easy, that i'm really surprised by your assumption that i'm spewing some bullshit, without even considering it.
Maybe because I know the project's biggest issue is that most people go "can't wait for the release" and don't really want /can help make it. Even in the Codex I have to create threads like this to get more feedback. Why would I create a tool if there's no one to use it?
Also, please stop this "no work needed" bullshit.
Or that your work is open-sourcy, cc and stuff, and if i want to do so, then i can do a fucking website. Anything on the subject would be good.
Yes, it's CC and once the book is finished (or maybe after the printed release, just to avoid issues) I'll release all the files and you can do a "no work needed" website and what not.
Doing it now would be a waste of "no work", since the content is still changing with every release, it needs to be proof-read and whatnot.
When i'm talking about newbie hooks, you're assuming that i'm anti-oldschool and pro-casual. When discussing if there is a better way to view the book on a pc, you're assuming that i'm anti-books. When i'm suggesting that you can do a website, you assume that i want to make Gamespot for old crpgs.
So, you would take my suggestions out of context, turn them around, and tell me that i'm naive, rather than read my post, understand and discuss?
You are the one that wanted to brainstorm the shit out of this topic, so maybe take a step back and look at the big picture. I'm really not trying to rape your book, just throwing some ideas around.
And yeah, maybe i'm 3 years too late to influence you in any way, but if you don't want to do anything with this project after the release of printed version (cause you're burnt-out or smthn), then just say so!
They are not excluding - I've been discussing AND calling you naive (more now, with these "no work needed" claims).
Look at the big picture - at the walls of text between you and me this thread has become. How the fuck you see that and go "you're not discussing!". Not to mention that took many ideas from this thread, including the one to make a FAQ/Beginner's Guide article at the start of the book.
Ok, so it's a lot of work, but is kinda shitty of you to answer my question with 'i won't do that cause i'm doing some other stuff right now'. But you WILL do that? Are you thinking about it? You won't do that ever cause you don't like the idea?
It's not shitty, it's common sense. if you went to Larian now and asked "What's D:OS 3 gonna be like?" they'll probably reply the same thing - "Chill, we're doing D:OS 2 now".
They have to finish the game, see what didn't make it in, see the reaction & reviews, their budget, the tech advances, the state of the company, etc. Same thing here. I'm not gonna branch this until I'm done, and see no reason to make dumb promises like "I'LL DO IT" or "I'LL NEVER DO IT" now.
Personally, I think converting the book to a website is a pointless waste of time and I have zero interest in doing so - for all the reasons listed above. But I still got to finish the book, make a crowd-funding campaign, release the physical version, etc... who knows what will change until then. I began this project living in São Paulo, now I live in Tokyo. Can't say what the future holds.