Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Civilization: Revolution NEVER NEVER coming to PCs. (Good)

AlanC9

Liturgist
Joined
Aug 12, 2003
Messages
505
dagorkan said:
The whole point of Civ's popularity is that gameplay number one, it doesn't have the complexity of eg Paradox Games but complexity =! fun and Paradox Games suck after a few play throughs, once you've worked out what the mechanics are it's just boring.
Click to expand...

What's complex about, say, HoI2? The mechanics are pretty simple. The underlying claculations are kind of complex, but you don't have to know that much to play the game.
 

Dmitron

Arbiter
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
1,918
Maybe I was being a bit tough on Civ by saying child-like. No denying that the game has a storybook (the characture like portrayal of historical figures) quality to it.

I think I'm just bored of the history lite theme. Put it down to personal taste..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom