Roguey, real-life immigration rights has fuck-all to do with SJW style "diversity and inclusion." I'll give you a hint: One works with actual immigrants and actual problems, pursuing actual solutions. The other stays the fuck away from people like that in life but goes on twitter tirades complaining about fictional representation and language on behalf of imaginary persecuted minorities and imagines herself a champion of truth and justice for it because her circlejerk of fair-weather friends said so. And the former group usually dislikes the latter group because they make the struggle for human rights seem petty and retarded.
You're just jumping to conclusions and being judgmental, really.
Maybe. But given what Kotario posted up above and this other prog-activist lawyer's thoughts, it could be the right conclusion.
https://twitter.com/thewolflawyer/status/1409054608639463429
These Plaintiff’s lawyers at Johnson & Johnson are lucky they’re a media law firm without a twitter presence because I would be dragging them so hard right now. Neville Johnson ought to be ashamed of this pleading. Utter garbage.
So the firm’s website contains these counters. I suspect this litigation will result in an increase in the number of media articles and features. Possibly a few media articles and features about how apparently their client, Chris Avellone, is a sex pest. Good move geniuses.
There are 100 defendants who are all agents of one another. So either, the most convoluted agency authority in history was drafted for the express purpose of creating a paper trail of a conspiracy to defame this bloke or they’re relying on ostensible agency.
Ostensible agency requires that the principal, not the agent, did something which conveyed that the agent was within the scope of their authority. I wonder what these 100 anonymous people did which suggests, objectively that they authorised the others to speak on their behalf.
That seems near impossible to prove. I’m sure the brilliant lawyers at Johnson & Johnson are up to the task and this isn’t just some censorious nonsense designed to chill anyone who would otherwise be anonymously critical of their client into silence. Surely not.
Obviously it’s impossible to conspire with yourself. Can an agent, acting on behalf of their principal and within the scope of their agency, therefore be conspiring with their principal? I’ve never thought about it. Can 100 agents who are also principals be conspiring together?
Christ on a bike: I’m innumerate so maybe I’m wrong but it seems to me that they need to prove about 20,000 agency relationships based on objective facts. If they’re very efficient and the court takes no days off that should only take about 50 years.
I'm not a lawyer or a legal expert so I have no idea if they're just plain wrong because their brains have been broken by their progressive politics or if they're just trying to do their part to intimidate Avellone into dropping the suit (DARVO since they're accusing him of trying to intimidate his accusers) or if they are in fact legally right (in which case I would absolutely believe it was intentional sabotage).
You don't care about MCA because you like RPGs, you care about MCA because you like him and he posted here, so he's part of your "tribe" and you must defend him no matter what, which is why you also pointed out other RPG-devs that post here. He retired nearly 10 years ago. He has nothing to do with RPGs anymore.And you are just proving your lacking of reading comprehension, it isnt hard to come to the shocking conclusion that a site that likes RPGs care more about people who make RPGs than some random dude we dont know about, what you expect? Lets go talk about the case of Mr. Ubisoft middle manager we never heard about and was too busy making microtransactions to Ass Creed? If MRY, BlackThorne, Pike and all other developer dudes we actually care about suffered the same fate we would be pissed but on your world, caring about someone you actually give a shit is cult of personality.You're completely proving my point. "I wouldn't support a guy that made shit games" (ubisoft) and "We supported that guy accused by zoe quinn" (political reasons). Exactly, I know that. That's exactly what I said. 95% of people here support Avellone out of reflex, either for political reasons or for a cult of personality. It's nothing to be ashamed of, just don't pretend it's an achievement, lol.
And, duh, Mr. Obvious, political ideology that says demanding proof of claimed crimes is equal to be a white male supremacist nazi killer of puppies and openly defend trial by mob actually is known of doing: trail by mob and being full of bs crime claims, sure, you totally should trust any stranger that says you are a nazi because you dont believe on their claims, if you dont, you are a nazi out for the blood of the poor SJWs.
No, immediately believing someone you care about without even questioning anything is a cult of personality.but on your world, caring about someone you actually give a shit is cult of personality.
Ashamed is a heavy word. You shouldn't feel ashamed, but you should reevaluate your thought process because tribalism makes you look like a retard.You're completely proving my point. "I wouldn't support a guy that made shit games" (ubisoft) and "We supported that guy accused by zoe quinn" (political reasons). Exactly, I know that. That's exactly what I said. 95% of people here support Avellone out of reflex, either for political reasons or for a cult of personality. It's nothing to be ashamed of, just don't pretend it's an achievement, lol.
It is something to be ashamed of, but go right ahead and tell yourself that it isn't. If you believe that justice should only come to those you like (or are in your tribe), you are an Animal.
In fact it is the other why around, because your instinct, of course does that, you need to take a step back and give the benefit of the doubt, otherwise we can just go start hanging people again randomly.
EDIT: and don't get me wrong, thats goes for everyone who believes that.
How can you give the benefit of the doubt if the person that makes the accusation refuses to make a clear point, refuses to use the law and totally depends on mob pressure to silence those who question her?
We also supported that developer guy that suicided because Zoe Quinn also made similar bs claims .
Dude, it is a simple concept that you cant understand because you just bought the meme that the codex is a hivemind, it isnt, it is a simple concept:No, immediately believing someone you care about without even questioning anything is a cult of personality.
Probably just lighting and makeup but it seems this bitch hit THE WALL hard in 2013.
We also supported that developer guy that suicided because Zoe Quinn also made similar bs claims .
Hey speak for yourself i don't support faggots or furries.
They are not sending their best.The self proclaimed "lawtwitter" group are known to be retards at best if not intentionally intellectually dishonest. Most of the ones that are actually licensed to practice are academics who have never actually practiced law, and more still are paralegals or students and not actual lawyers. It turns out actual lawyers have better things to do than whine on Twitter all day. These "people" are so laughable just calling them fat makes them shit themselves.
Having worn a diverse set of hats, from boxer to comic to businessman to lawyer, Dylan understands how to fight, how to work, and how to grow,
A true renaissance man.
Roguey, real-life immigration rights has fuck-all to do with SJW style "diversity and inclusion." I'll give you a hint: One works with actual immigrants and actual problems, pursuing actual solutions. The other stays the fuck away from people like that in life but goes on twitter tirades complaining about fictional representation and language on behalf of imaginary persecuted minorities and imagines herself a champion of truth and justice for it because her circlejerk of fair-weather friends said so. And the former group usually dislikes the latter group because they make the struggle for human rights seem petty and retarded.
You're just jumping to conclusions and being judgmental, really.
Maybe. But given what Kotario posted up above and this other prog-activist lawyer's thoughts, it could be the right conclusion.
https://twitter.com/thewolflawyer/status/1409054608639463429
These Plaintiff’s lawyers at Johnson & Johnson are lucky they’re a media law firm without a twitter presence because I would be dragging them so hard right now. Neville Johnson ought to be ashamed of this pleading. Utter garbage.
So the firm’s website contains these counters. I suspect this litigation will result in an increase in the number of media articles and features. Possibly a few media articles and features about how apparently their client, Chris Avellone, is a sex pest. Good move geniuses.
There are 100 defendants who are all agents of one another. So either, the most convoluted agency authority in history was drafted for the express purpose of creating a paper trail of a conspiracy to defame this bloke or they’re relying on ostensible agency.
Ostensible agency requires that the principal, not the agent, did something which conveyed that the agent was within the scope of their authority. I wonder what these 100 anonymous people did which suggests, objectively that they authorised the others to speak on their behalf.
That seems near impossible to prove. I’m sure the brilliant lawyers at Johnson & Johnson are up to the task and this isn’t just some censorious nonsense designed to chill anyone who would otherwise be anonymously critical of their client into silence. Surely not.
Obviously it’s impossible to conspire with yourself. Can an agent, acting on behalf of their principal and within the scope of their agency, therefore be conspiring with their principal? I’ve never thought about it. Can 100 agents who are also principals be conspiring together?
Christ on a bike: I’m innumerate so maybe I’m wrong but it seems to me that they need to prove about 20,000 agency relationships based on objective facts. If they’re very efficient and the court takes no days off that should only take about 50 years.
I'm not a lawyer or a legal expert so I have no idea if they're just plain wrong because their brains have been broken by their progressive politics or if they're just trying to do their part to intimidate Avellone into dropping the suit (DARVO since they're accusing him of trying to intimidate his accusers) or if they are in fact legally right (in which case I would absolutely believe it was intentional sabotage).
What karoliner? You arent on my tribe? Accordingly to TheSentinel you were, so sad now.We also supported that developer guy that suicided because Zoe Quinn also made similar bs claims .
Hey speak for yourself.
Having worn a diverse set of hats, from boxer to comic to businessman to lawyer, Dylan understands how to fight, how to work, and how to grow,
A true renaissance man.
From what I hear, getting a generalist lawyer is mostly bad, rookie mistake. You want a dude who is autistic about that specific field you need him in. And this guy looks too young to have had many court cases, to boot. Gettin bad feelings about this tbh
?TheSentinel is just making stuff up at this point, like stating he retired 10 years ago (wtf, even a cursory search about Avellone proves that is not true ). Another leftie with a chip on his shoulder.
Sorry, I quoted you along with him.
Get a grip, I am not arguing against you and never have. You must have understood something I did not say. I specifically answered the Sentinel who said it would be normal to defend someone of your own group.
That is my last post on this part of the topic.
Meanwhile, what does Avellone have to lose?
"You care more about people you like than those who mean nothing to you", amazing psychological analysis.You don't care about MCA because you like RPGs, you care about MCA because you like him and he posted here, so he's part of your "tribe" and you must defend him no matter what, which is why you also pointed out other RPG-devs that post here. He retired nearly 10 years ago. He has nothing to do with RPGs anymore.
Amazing reading comprehension. This has nothing to do with caring or not caring, it's about what the caring leads you to do. But even that isn't relevant to what the original post was about, the conversation has completely derailed."You care more about people you like than those who mean nothing to you", amazing psychological analysis.You don't care about MCA because you like RPGs, you care about MCA because you like him and he posted here, so he's part of your "tribe" and you must defend him no matter what, which is why you also pointed out other RPG-devs that post here. He retired nearly 10 years ago. He has nothing to do with RPGs anymore.
The original point was about feeling proud for defending Avellone, like that's an achievement and took any effort lol.And what did it lead us to do? Care about the case because we played games he was involved in, and believe he was innocent because no proof ever came out and he never admitted to it? That's terrible.