Delterius
Arcane
You shouldn't be able to add attributes to a set value.Ring of Human Influence sets CHA to 18.Ring of human influence plus some +smthing items (likely the cloak since horrible 3 AC).
Correct. And what's your point?
You shouldn't be able to add attributes to a set value.Ring of Human Influence sets CHA to 18.Ring of human influence plus some +smthing items (likely the cloak since horrible 3 AC).
Correct. And what's your point?
You shouldn't be able to add attributes to a set value.Ring of Human Influence sets CHA to 18.Ring of human influence plus some +smthing items (likely the cloak since horrible 3 AC).
Correct. And what's your point?
Well, at this point its hard to remember what is a bugfix and what isn't.You shouldn't be able to add attributes to a set value.Ring of Human Influence sets CHA to 18.Ring of human influence plus some +smthing items (likely the cloak since horrible 3 AC).
Correct. And what's your point?
Despite how you wish things would work... you are still able in BG2.
You really haven't seen many posts by Fap-Tomato if you think that way.To be honest you're okay. Dunno why you got dumbfuck'd.
How did you get 21 charisma?
did beamdog ever fix sorcerers spells to actually depend on charisma? because I'm pretty sure it's irrelevant, despite what the manual says.How did you get 21 charisma?
What stat were they dependent on?did beamdog ever fix sorcerers spells to actually depend on charisma? because I'm pretty sure it's irrelevant, despite what the manual says.How did you get 21 charisma?
My own version of Baldur's Gate II - which is very, very much the vanilla version, albeit with a Polish translation - gives you a big, fat warning message in the class description that Sorcerers do not learn spells from scrolls and that "the casting attribute of sorcerers is INTELLIGENCE." (exact wording). The bit with charisma is probably you extrapolating the way Sorcerers work in the 3rd edition of D&D onto BG2, since the three new classes in BG2 are hackjobs of 3e classes. So the original, 3E Sorcerer uses Charisma to cast, the BG2 Sorcerer is supposed to use Intelligence, and the net result is that Sorcerers don't have a casting stat. Wrap your head around that.nothing. the bit in the original kit description (edit: actually where was this??? was it patched out because I don't see it now, but I remember being left with this impression too)
nothing. the bit in the original kit description (edit: actually where was this??? was it patched out because I don't see it now, but I remember being left with this impression too) hinting at them being dependent on char was bogus.
you could have 3 in every stat and still cast spells fine
I'm just not sure where I got the idea that it depended on CHAR though. I seem to remember always thinking this. Not sure if I looked it up online and got some bad info or what. I didn't play P&P, so I'd have had no idea about 3rd Edition.
this was probably it (or maybe a patched game description too), but I have no idea where my old B2 manual is. I tried looking in the GOG manual, but it's been fixed I think.BG2 paper manuals
It's not in the SoA manual, I checked mine. Neither in the description of Charisma or Sorceror, nor in the tables in the Appendix. It might have been in the original in-game CHA description text though, as I was under the same assumption and never played any 3.X games. Maybe there was a tweak mod that introduced CHA dependence?this was probably it (or maybe a patched game description too), but I have no idea where my old B2 manual is. I tried looking in the GOG manual, but it's been fixed I think.BG2 paper manuals
Since the class is kinda stolen from 3ed it doesn't really matter.
So a lot of people in the Steam Releases thread are talking about how Beamdog are the antichrist, they eat babies etc. and no one should ever support them.
Personally, I have no interest in replaying the IE games but I'm curious why these guys draw so much hate. Trying to clean up the interface etc. of old games doesn't seem particularly evil to me.
In 50 words or less, what's your take?
So a lot of people in the Steam Releases thread are talking about how Beamdog are the antichrist, they eat babies etc. and no one should ever support them.
Personally, I have no interest in replaying the IE games but I'm curious why these guys draw so much hate. Trying to clean up the interface etc. of old games doesn't seem particularly evil to me.
In 50 words or less, what's your take?