-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
.
- Thread starter sigard
- Start date
hello friend
Arcane
You don't have to use the new graphics. They're a crime against nature but with the flick of a switch you're playing classic MI again.
hello friend
Arcane
Voted accordingly
Even the VGA version Is decline from the EGA, save for the character portraits.
"Decent enough" was meant in comparison to Return to MI. The remake's character designs look horrible but the environment art is decent and has enough visual clarity to be comfortably playable unlike Return to Monkey Island.
Are you too fucking retarded to understand the point? Are you one of these mentally stunted people who are physically unable to appreciate art and process visuals from an aesthetic standpoint?
FeelTheRads saying that "everything looks like plastic" is not a criticism of visual fidelity but a criticism of visual presentation, of artstyle, of aesthetics.
Morrowind and Gothic 2 have much lower visual fidelity than Fallout 3 yet they look better because Fallout 3 has a plastic-like look on any surface that's supposed to be wet and glistening (especially noticeable on gore giblets). Fallout 4 has higher visual fidelity and also looks better than FO3. The fact that FO3's textures look like shit and some surfaces look like they're coated in plastic is not a criticism of its visual fidelity, but of the aesthetic effect caused by the game's level of fidelity. Downgrading the effects responsible for creating the plastic-like look of some objects would be as much of a solution as upgrading the effect to the point it stops being plasticy.
Are you too fucking retarded to understand the point? Are you one of these mentally stunted people who are physically unable to appreciate art and process visuals from an aesthetic standpoint?
FeelTheRads saying that "everything looks like plastic" is not a criticism of visual fidelity but a criticism of visual presentation, of artstyle, of aesthetics.
Morrowind and Gothic 2 have much lower visual fidelity than Fallout 3 yet they look better because Fallout 3 has a plastic-like look on any surface that's supposed to be wet and glistening (especially noticeable on gore giblets). Fallout 4 has higher visual fidelity and also looks better than FO3. The fact that FO3's textures look like shit and some surfaces look like they're coated in plastic is not a criticism of its visual fidelity, but of the aesthetic effect caused by the game's level of fidelity. Downgrading the effects responsible for creating the plastic-like look of some objects would be as much of a solution as upgrading the effect to the point it stops being plasticy.
El Presidente
Arcane
Very bad but better than the new game. By the way, what happened to that other thread?
Get the fuck out of my forum you sub-room temperature IQ troglodyte.
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.