Castanova
Prophet
God damn it, why can't I seem to get a beta key? You jerks!!
Main difference I noticed (after one game) is that the AIs have some different openings - they don't just rush immediately every time. It's alright, but...MetalCraze said:Is Turd AI 6.0 any good?
Castanova said:God damn it, why can't I seem to get a beta key? You jerks!!
Firewrks said:Castanova said:God damn it, why can't I seem to get a beta key? You jerks!!
MetalCraze said:Is Turd AI 6.0 any good?
Overweight Manatee said:MetalCraze said:Is Turd AI 6.0 any good?
6.1 is finally approaching a half decent player.
Malakal said:DAMN ITS ABOUT TIME.
This is actually the only rts I am looking forward to. Not because I dislike the genre or anything its just that Blizzard is the only company that still delivers.
Haters gonna hate.
Castanova said:I don't feel like there's a go-to early game strategy for Terran. Marines suck unless you build like 10,000 of them. Marauders are expensive. Reapers suck except for harassing.
Sentries are fucking amazing. I can see using them every single game, throughout the game.
Castanova said:Fair enough but doesn't that basically concede the early game to your opponent? I mean, a Zerg is gonna fast expand regardless but I feel like it could be suicide to let a Protoss expand with no resistance.
Castanova said:The other issue is I always manage to screw up the choke point wall-in with Terran.
Castanova said:I've been watching a lot of replays/vids on Youtube. I have to say, the quality of play at the platinum level is clearly inferior to SC1 play. I suppose it shouldn't be terribly surprising since the game is relatively new but still - there are a ton of platinum matches with minimal scouting, minimal harassing, minimal fighting. Everybody kind of pokes around a bit then settles in and the two players basically gift each other an expansion while they build an army. I feel like it's pretty clear that someone more skilled could come in and win like 95% of their platinum games.