Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

I've never played any Half Life games

Heresiarch

Prophet
Joined
Mar 8, 2008
Messages
1,451
...except for Counterstrike 1.4 to 1.6, and I'm very good at it. But otherwise, I've never played any of the canon series. Does this makes me a faggot? Should I play them one day, or I'm missing out one of the awesomest game evah?
 

Metro

Arcane
Beg Auditor
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
27,792
The first is pretty good. Although you'll want to stop playing when you get to Xen. The base game is long enough such that you probably won't even want to bother with the expansions. HL2 is okay but grossly overrated. The overly long vehicle sections are extremely annoying but it has some cool settings that make you forget it's basically on-rails.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
2,951
Try Black Mesa. It's free and quite fun actually. Not exactly like the original, but a hell of a lot better then HL2.
 

Quilty

Magister
Joined
Apr 11, 2008
Messages
2,413
Never touched those either. They just seem too boring.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2007
Messages
2,951
Black Mesa was a forgettable turd. Only play the original + Opfor. Then proceed with the HL2 series.
If Black Mesa is shit, then why the hell would you recommend HL2? It's basically the same, only with derpier story, worse enemies and half the bloody time you are just escorting that bloody Mary Sue.
 

DraQ

Arcane
Joined
Oct 24, 2007
Messages
32,828
Location
Chrząszczyżewoszyce, powiat Łękołody
The first is pretty good. Although you'll want to stop playing when you get to Xen.
GTFO.
Xen is awesomely alien and cool change of pace. No amount of shitty platforming will change that, especially after you have already handled Residue Processing - the actual spurious derpy platforming section of the game.

Without Xen HL would be just another FPS exclusively about shooting enemies in rooms full of crates.
 

Spectacle

Arcane
Patron
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
8,363
Half-Life's way of integrating the story into gameplay was unique at the time and has had huge influence on gaming since then, but the game itself is nothing special. The same goes for HL2, except it's no longer innovative and the story and characters are much derpier.

I say give the original a spin and see if you like it, it's not a bad shooter.
 

zwanzig_zwoelf

Guest
Half-Life's way of integrating the story into gameplay was unique at the time and has had huge influence on gaming since then, but the game itself is nothing special. The same goes for HL2, except it's no longer innovative and the story and characters are much derpier.

I say give the original a spin and see if you like it, it's not a bad shooter.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Except that the same way of integrating the story into gameplay was in Cybermage.
 

Coriolanus

Learned
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Messages
355
Location
Limberry Castle
HL1 single player campaign was OK but overrated - it's not as good as the classic FPS oldies. Great multiplayer though, one of the most fun I've had on LAN with friends.

Half-Life's way of integrating the story into gameplay was unique at the time and has had huge influence on gaming since then, but the game itself is nothing special.
I think it's the opposite. HL1, for one, had zero cutscenes.

HL2 was very ambitious but turned out mediocre. Entirely skippable.
 

zwanzig_zwoelf

Guest
By the way, the series are overrated (in my opinion), so I'd recommend you to try it just to see for yourself.
 

Don Peste

Arcane
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
4,284
Location
||☆||
It will not play the same. Your only chance is to have a son, raise him like it's 1999 and make him play it.
Then, die happy.
 

aris

Arcane
Joined
Apr 27, 2012
Messages
11,613
  1. Hl1 is good as kind of a tour of something that was once quite new and innovative, and it has solid FPS-mechanics, or if you're a nostalgia fag (you can't be a graphics whore, HL1 did not age gracefully). HL2 and episode 1 and 2 are really good.
 

Heresiarch

Prophet
Joined
Mar 8, 2008
Messages
1,451
Wow, didn't expect so much discrepancies between you guys' opinions. So it seems both HL1 and HL2 are very good and very bad with only opposing force being the only universally accepted one. But then again isn't that just an expansion pack? Not playing as Gordon? Wut?

My next gen bairns is so confused and is telling me I should stick to Planetside 2 instead.
 

octavius

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
19,226
Location
Bjørgvin
only opposing force being the only universally accepted one. But then again isn't that just an expansion pack? Not playing as Gordon? Wut?

It's an expansion pack and you play as Gordon, but what makes it extra fun is the fights with allied marines against the aliens. Also, no boring jumping puzzles IIRC. Just more and better action, like a good expansion should be. Blue Shift is a good example of what an expansion should not be.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom