Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Bioware's no-homosexuality rule in RPGs

suibhne

Erudite
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
1,951
Location
Chicago
Shinan said:
PennyAnte said:
Also, I should note that I’ve never seen a female Hutt. What do they look like anyway?
In Episode one when Jabba walks out to start the Pod Race there's another Hutt beside him. I think it's meant to be his wife if my memory serves me right. I'm not 100% sure though.

I watched it again two nights ago, and I'm certain that Jabba's the only Hutt there.
 

ElastiZombie

Liturgist
Joined
Aug 27, 2003
Messages
142
Location
Soviet Canuckistan
suibhne said:
Shinan said:
PennyAnte said:
Also, I should note that I’ve never seen a female Hutt. What do they look like anyway?
In Episode one when Jabba walks out to start the Pod Race there's another Hutt beside him. I think it's meant to be his wife if my memory serves me right. I'm not 100% sure though.

I watched it again two nights ago, and I'm certain that Jabba's the only Hutt there.

According to the official star wars site, they are hermaphrodites.
http://www.starwars.com/databank/species/hutt/?id=eu

Which leads me to say: ew...

And it brings up another issue: Lack of hermaphroditic romance options in RPGs! :D
 

Spazmo

Erudite
Joined
Nov 9, 2002
Messages
5,752
Location
Monkey Island
Nonsense! Half of RPGs today are either so bad, short or disappointing that buying them is essentially fucking yourself.
 

Otaku_Hanzo

Erudite
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Messages
3,463
Location
The state of insanity.
suibhne said:
I watched it again two nights ago, and I'm certain that Jabba's the only Hutt there.

There is another Hutt there. And, yes, it does look rather feminine. As for them being Herms, that's how they are described in the pen and paper RPG, which is why the effeminite Hutt in Ep. 1 kind of through me for a moment. But then who's to say that they can't get more in touch with their feminite side? :P
 

Fez

Erudite
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
7,954
Devil's advocate = FUN! :D

Thanks for going straight to the strawman and calling me a moron, I expected no less of the plebs. It's like fishing with magic bait, it never fails to reel in a good catch.

I think sex and probably romance in games should just be avoided most of the time, it often doesn't work unless they go for the comedy angle. The romances are usually picked apart when it comes to complaints, and sex is just a bad idea as it will just make everyone consider it interactive porn and will probably be embarrassing to anyone with a partner or family present if they make it realistic and if they don't it'll just look stupid and pointless, like the black screen and moaning noises in Bloodlines (though I'd say the Gothic 2 sex/dry humping scene was ten times worse). I don't think it adds much to a game. I wouldn't of missed the romance being cut from KOTOR, in BG2 I'd at least not have to worry about the party of harlots hitting on the PC every minute and interrupting the flow of the game to whine about their love life while we are stuck in a monster infested hell hole and in Gothic 2 I'd not have been treated to something that shocked me with just how poor it was.

Oh and I really don't think we need to demand more games with black lesbian cripples to even out some imaginary quota somewhere. There are no great masses complaining about it how hard done by they are so it seems things are fine. The developers make the game they want and envisage, I doubt any are saying "Up yours cripples! We are deliberately not going to include a crippled, wheelchair bound Jedi knight/wizard/cyberhacker PC just to piss you off because we hate you!". To borrow what was said earlier, the thought might not have entered their head at all.

Though of course Otaku got it right, it is all due to the strength of the gravitational pull of the sun.
 

suibhne

Erudite
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
1,951
Location
Chicago
Otaku_Hanzo said:
suibhne said:
I watched it again two nights ago, and I'm certain that Jabba's the only Hutt there.

There is another Hutt there. And, yes, it does look rather feminine.

Yes and yes. I stand corrected. :)

The other Hutt doesn't look as good as Jabba, speaking strictly in terms of special effects. But it definitely appears more feminine.
 

elkston

Novice
Joined
Oct 28, 2004
Messages
75
Ap_Jolly said:
Or we could always have a token black NPC, and a token gay romance situation.

I hope you realize that these are two totally different levels of "tolerances".

Being inclusive about different skin colors is totally different from being inclusive about homosexuality.

I'm a black CRPGS player. I like being able to play black hero , but it doesn't bother me a great deal if I can't. Playing a fun and engrossing game is more important to me. What I DON"T like is having "gay" pushed upon me and I'm supposed to pretend that I'm okay with it when I am not. Lets face it -- most men ARE heterosexual and its going to stay that way.

Personally, I think games should stay of out the romance and sexuality business. Seriously -- don't ask, don't tell. There are plenty of others areas they can focus on. If anything, perhaps imply relationships or use inuendo. Leave the rest up to the player's imagination.

I'm sure any gay players would feel the same way. Just make the game neutral on that point. If you're kick ass in all other aspects, no-one is going to care.
 

AlanC9

Liturgist
Joined
Aug 12, 2003
Messages
505
elkston said:
I hope you realize that these are two totally different levels of "tolerances".

Being inclusive about different skin colors is totally different from being inclusive about homosexuality.

What difference would that be?

What I DON"T like is having "gay" pushed upon me and I'm supposed to pretend that I'm okay with it when I am not. Lets face it -- most men ARE heterosexual and its going to stay that way.

What counts as having it "pushed on you?" I'm not aware of any games where you're forced to play a gay character.
 

elkston

Novice
Joined
Oct 28, 2004
Messages
75
AlanC9 said:
elkston said:
I hope you realize that these are two totally different levels of "tolerances".

Being inclusive about different skin colors is totally different from being inclusive about homosexuality.

What difference would that be?

Its just that "gay", especially when we're talking about guys, is a whole different ballgame.

Somebody of a different skin color *may* have a different cultural background (or may not) from you. But he's still a guy who likes women. He's somebody you can relate to. You can "hang" with this guy a bit more comfortably than somebody you know is gay. Cause the fact that he is gay will just be sticking in your mind and you just can't shake the fact that he likes men. That's just a fundamental "wierd" thing that goes waaay beyond accepting differences in skin color.

What I DON"T like is having "gay" pushed upon me and I'm supposed to pretend that I'm okay with it when I am not. Lets face it -- most men ARE heterosexual and its going to stay that way.

What counts as having it "pushed on you?" I'm not aware of any games where you're forced to play a gay character.

OK. I was just mouthing off there. I don't know of any games that force you to play a gay person.

But I was just annoyed because it seems often when somebody (in most cases a white male) wants to challenge the "PC"-ness of something, they just throw black and gays all together as if its the same thing. LIke if you accept one, you have to accpet the other.
 

AlanC9

Liturgist
Joined
Aug 12, 2003
Messages
505
elkston said:
Somebody of a different skin color *may* have a different cultural background (or may not) from you. But he's still a guy who likes women. He's somebody you can relate to. You can "hang" with this guy a bit more comfortably than somebody you know is gay. Cause the fact that he is gay will just be sticking in your mind and you just can't shake the fact that he likes men. That's just a fundamental "wierd" thing that goes waaay beyond accepting differences in skin color.

If you say so. For me, finding out a guy's gay is like finding out he's a vegetarian -- it's of no interest unless I'm planning a dinner party. It's more important whether a woman's a lesbian because that takes her off my target list, of course.

But I was just annoyed because it seems often when somebody (in most cases a white male) wants to challenge the "PC"-ness of something, they just throw black and gays all together as if its the same thing. LIke if you accept one, you have to accpet the other.

True, probably because they see having a problem with either as being equally reprehensible. But they are two very different sources of unease.
 

Mendoza

Liturgist
Joined
Sep 24, 2004
Messages
277
elkston said:
Its just that "gay", especially when we're talking about guys, is a whole different ballgame.

Somebody of a different skin color *may* have a different cultural background (or may not) from you. But he's still a guy who likes women. He's somebody you can relate to. You can "hang" with this guy a bit more comfortably than somebody you know is gay. Cause the fact that he is gay will just be sticking in your mind and you just can't shake the fact that he likes men. That's just a fundamental "wierd" thing that goes waaay beyond accepting differences in skin color.

Really? I suspect that a couple of hundred years ago a lot of white men would have said a similar thing about being uncomfortable around black people. I have a gay housemate and I don't find him any harder to relate to or get on with than any of my other housemates.

I suspect though that the main reason for the lack of gay romances is purely due to the amount of effort required to cater to a (presumably, I don't have any figures) relatively small percentage of the market. Comparatively, adding additional skins/skin colours requires less work, and caters to (again presumably) a much greater percentage of the market.
 

EvoG

Erudite
Joined
Mar 25, 2003
Messages
1,424
Location
Chicago
Dan said:
Gays are an ass sore to code though.


Actually it would've been funnier if you stuck with the obvious :

Gay relationships are a pain in the ass... and so on....see...thats comedy! :P



Cheers
 

DarkSign

Erudite
Joined
Jul 24, 2004
Messages
3,910
Location
Shepardizing caselaw with the F5 button.
I see where our African-American/Black/Negro/Person of Color friend is going with his statement that skin color is a diferent type of minority than sexual proclivity, but you've just set the civil rights movement back, buddy.

Just because you can SEE skin color and homosexuality cant be "proven" that doesnt change the fact that its a minority.

And Ill tell you what...lets do an experiment:

a) drop a white person in the middle of Harlem at midnight
b) drop a straight guy in a gay club in New Orleans

one will come out "fabulously dressed" and the other will be lucky to get out with his life.

While the black establishment in America would love to wallow in self-pity for thousands of years, it doesnt allow you to play "we're a TRUER minority than you are."

That all being said, I do think that it is about the comfort level of the customer base...and also about limited creation time. I would my transexual nazi eskimo brother feel left out if they didnt have a detailed storyline in every game for him/her ?
 

Fez

Erudite
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
7,954
I would pay good money to have an RPG with a transsexual nazi eskimo PC.
 

MarFish

Liturgist
Joined
Dec 7, 2004
Messages
266
I felt the urge to unearth this topic since Llama God has prophetic powers.

Apparently there are several possible combinations for homosexual romances in Jade Empire in addition to the standard romances and even some suggestive cutscenes.

Male Male, Female Female, Male Female Female have been listed.

Probably another reason for that M rating.

Looks like the suggested non-homosexuality rule were more restrictions of the Starwars and D&D licenses than anything else.
 

Sol Invictus

Erudite
Joined
Oct 19, 2002
Messages
9,614
Location
Pax Romana
Man, Homosexuality just doesn't fly with ancient China, or Japan for that matter. MFF does, though. I hope that they're "suggestive" romances of the Planescape Torment variety and not the 'in your face, I just made you a baby!' variety of Baldur's Gate 2, though.
 

Fez

Erudite
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
7,954
I want to see "balls deep" homosex in the game.
 

Spazmo

Erudite
Joined
Nov 9, 2002
Messages
5,752
Location
Monkey Island
I want the next BioWare RPG to allow me to produce a child with a same sex partner (BY MAGIC) and then sexually abuse that child. It's fucking roleplaying, my character is a child molester.
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,928
"Man, Homosexuality just doesn't fly with ancient China,"

A. That's right. There were no gays in aicient China. None. Zilch. Zero.

B. Jade Empire ain't Ancient China.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom