Vault Dweller Ubersturmfuhrer

Joined: 07 Jan 2003 Posts: 15337 Location: Vault 13
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 8:55 pm Post subject: Characters in iso mode |
|
|
Link
Top to bottom: light fighter, assassin, loremaster (that's a magnifying glass on his staff and a chakram in his hand), heavy fighter
A question for you, guys. The heavy fighter has a 2H sword in one hand. That's something that we are playing right now with. The way I see it a strong character (Str>8) should be able to use a 2H weapon in one hand with 30% of the skill value penalty (i.e. if your sword skill is 80, your accuracy with a 2H sword is 56, if the skill is 200, the accuracy is 140, etc). What do you think? _________________ Spazmo: Odds are, something you like very much sucks. Why? Because this is RPG Codex. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Whipporowill Nude Kid On the Block

Joined: 18 May 2003 Posts: 2955 Location: 59°19'03"N 018°02'15"E
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looking good.
Yes.
That's all. R00fles. _________________ Retired RPG Codex Newshound
Eye On Troika - R.I.P
The Eyesore & other old crap
The Super Bowl, which I guess is happening today, is sort of like the Oscars for people who are still impressed by fire.
- Devin Faraci, CHUD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Major_Blackhart -


Joined: 05 Dec 2002 Posts: 5223 Location: Jersey for now
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fucking Nasty man, and I mean that in a good way. _________________ Well, it's not quite a mop, and it's not quite a puppet, but man oh man.
Nicolai wrote "You are the worst person ever, Blackhart."
http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/7018/rexsig24nq9ky.png |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Vault Dweller Ubersturmfuhrer

Joined: 07 Jan 2003 Posts: 15337 Location: Vault 13
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, Major _________________ Spazmo: Odds are, something you like very much sucks. Why? Because this is RPG Codex. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Human Shield


Joined: 07 Sep 2003 Posts: 2027 Location: VA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is that the correct zoom of the camera? I'd like to see them farther out and the camera more overhead.
Light fighter looks bad-ass.
Assassin looks wierdish in that green, too light make it darker or black.
Loremaster looks cool, nice rugged explorer feel. Staff give bonuses to examining stuff? I like the pouches and items.
Heavy fighter tower shield and sword look great and his body looks better, but his helmet looks too wide compared to others, looks like chubby marsmellow head. _________________ Axes are Blunt Weapons, Silly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Vault Dweller Ubersturmfuhrer

Joined: 07 Jan 2003 Posts: 15337 Location: Vault 13
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Human Shield wrote: | | Is that the correct zoom of the camera? I'd like to see them farther out and the camera more overhead. |
Could be arranged.
| Quote: | | Loremaster looks cool, nice rugged explorer feel. |
Thanks
| Quote: | | Staff give bonuses to examining stuff? |
Yep. Could be upgraded to have different applications, i.e. source of light, etc.
| Quote: | | Heavy fighter tower shield and sword look great and his body looks better, but his helmet looks too wide compared to others, looks like chubby marsmellow head. |
You are probably right. It's supposed to be that way, but it gives that character a weird look. Anyway, there are other heavy helmets that fit much better. _________________ Spazmo: Odds are, something you like very much sucks. Why? Because this is RPG Codex. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Section8 Synaesthete

Joined: 23 Oct 2002 Posts: 4309 Location: Wardenclyffe
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 12:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
What's the angle of elevation? It seems to be fairly shallow, which gives a bigger bias toward the view range in the direction the camera is looking. In a 3D game, that compells the player to want to be able to align that with the direction they're moving in. Which in turn necessitates easy manipulation of the camera, or some kind of automation. Still, it does show off the characters nicely for the cosplayers.
| Quote: | | A question for you, guys. The heavy fighter has a 2H sword in one hand. That's something that we are playing right now with. The way I see it a strong character (Str>8) should be able to use a 2H weapon in one hand with 30% of the skill value penalty (i.e. if your sword skill is 80, your accuracy with a 2H sword is 56, if the skill is 200, the accuracy is 140, etc). What do you think? |
Sounds like a reasonable choice to me, since a sword is a sword, and the only thing that forces humans to use two-handers as such is a strength limitation. I'd only suggest that maybe the penalty decreases as a product of ( (required strength for weapon) - (character strength) ), and maybe something else could be used to abstract the penalty rather than accuracy (damage and speed seem like likely candidates).
But, that's just an opinion given without consideration to the balance of the rest of the system, or any knowledge of the game mechanics.  _________________
| crakkie wrote: | | Multiheaded dick swings and hits you in the ass and leg for 10 points. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Vault Dweller Ubersturmfuhrer

Joined: 07 Jan 2003 Posts: 15337 Location: Vault 13
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was thinking about adding an extra Action Point to slow attacks a bit. _________________ Spazmo: Odds are, something you like very much sucks. Why? Because this is RPG Codex. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Greatatlantic -


Joined: 21 Feb 2005 Posts: 1684 Location: The Heart of It All
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
The question that comes to my mind is how handicapped is a lore master when it comes to combat and the game. A lot of games offer a thief or other class, only to have it be a very weak fighter with one or two bonuses that hardly compensate for the lack of combat ability. I know you're trying to offer different ways of solving quests, but even fallout realized avoiding all combat in a violent world wasn't easily done. _________________ "All this is pure speculation with no basis in reality, of course.." - Leonard Boyarsky
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in the above post are for entertainment purposes only, namely my entertainment. They may or may not represent the views of RPGCodex, its staff, or this poster. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Human Shield


Joined: 07 Sep 2003 Posts: 2027 Location: VA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm thinking the attributes that make a good loremaster (int, etc..) will make good alchemy.
And there are more nonviolent ways to solve things, since loremasters can get rich from a find they can pay people off. _________________ Axes are Blunt Weapons, Silly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Vault Dweller Ubersturmfuhrer

Joined: 07 Jan 2003 Posts: 15337 Location: Vault 13
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 2:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Greatatlantic wrote: | | The question that comes to my mind is how handicapped is a lore master when it comes to combat and the game. A lot of games offer a thief or other class, only to have it be a very weak fighter with one or two bonuses that hardly compensate for the lack of combat ability. |
It's a skill-based system, your loremaster would be as effective in combat and other areas as you'd make him. Unlike other games though, the combat is not the focus of the game, so your thief and loremaster aren't forced to fight.
| Quote: | | I know you're trying to offer different ways of solving quests, but even fallout realized avoiding all combat in a violent world wasn't easily done. |
It depends on implementation. Take a look at the old screens, that should give you an idea.
| Human Shield wrote: | | I'm thinking the attributes that make a good loremaster (int, etc..) will make good alchemy. |
And crafting
| Quote: | | And there are more nonviolent ways to solve things |
There are many non-violent ways to solve things. _________________ Spazmo: Odds are, something you like very much sucks. Why? Because this is RPG Codex. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Walks with the Snails


Joined: 05 Nov 2002 Posts: 2443 Location: The Lone Star State
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 5:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I guess I have a certain fascination with the assassin. He still looks a little too... obvious. The metal rings on the outside look like they've been de-shined, which is better, but then someone looking at them in the open would still start to wonder about the fellow. He looks like a highwayman that prefers to strike at night. If that's a genuine character option, cool, then the armor is associated more with bandits rather than assassins. Maybe if he had something really sneaky and roguish like D&D brigandine (metal strips sandwiched between leather or cloth to silence and conceal them while still offering decent protection), it would be better. I can see the desire for some degree of protection since no plan is foolproof, but the assassin's best friend should always be the element of surprise. I don't know how hard it would be to implement, but maybe assassins should get a bonus to their chances for a clean kill if they dress the part (look like a loremaster to walk into someone's house, start up a light conversation, and slip poison in their drink while admiring their artwork; dress in heavy armor to impersonate a soldier and get close to a centurion, etc.). An assassin who just saunters around town all the time dressed up like a bandit is most likely destined to be laughed at by his peers and enjoy a rather short career. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
callehe


Joined: 05 Dec 2004 Posts: 454 Location: Gothic Castle
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Looking very good VD!
Just one question, since it's 3d now, will all types of equipment be represented by character onscreen? That would give a nice diablo 2 touch to the game  _________________ www.pentrix.com
Learn the Art of Pen Spinning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
ichpokhudezh

Joined: 09 Jul 2004 Posts: 179 Location: germantown, md
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:03 pm Post subject: Re: Characters in iso mode |
|
|
| Vault Dweller wrote: | | A question for you, guys. The heavy fighter has a 2H sword in one hand. That's something that we are playing right now with. The way I see it a strong character (Str>8) should be able to use a 2H weapon in one hand with 30% of the skill value penalty (i.e. if your sword skill is 80, your accuracy with a 2H sword is 56, if the skill is 200, the accuracy is 140, etc). |
This does not seem right to me.
Why would accuracy suffer as long as one is _able_ to hold & swing that thing? On the other hand, the Str requirement should be doubled at least and Dex one (if you have it) should be increased somewhat. I was thinking double wield should suffer as well, but it seems now that it's actually the other way round - double wield (2 weapons) would improve balance, while shield will be mostly useless for protection (need to throw it to the back for balance), but might be used for bashing.
| Vault Dweller wrote: | | I was thinking about adding an extra Action Point to slow attacks a bit. |
This might be good. _________________ @Tom's Hardware: ...hopes that Vista might be able to speed up applications are gone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Vault Dweller Ubersturmfuhrer

Joined: 07 Jan 2003 Posts: 15337 Location: Vault 13
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:51 pm Post subject: Re: Characters in iso mode |
|
|
| ichpokhudezh wrote: | This does not seem right to me.
Why would accuracy suffer as long as one is _able_ to hold & swing that thing? |
I'm not an expert, but it seems to me that it's much easier to hit something with what you can wield easily vs with what you can barely hold. The STR requirement doesn't mean that you can use a 2H weapon as easily as one can use a short sword. It means that you are stronger than most, but not a titan.
| Quote: | | I was thinking double wield should suffer as well... |
There is no double wield in the traditional sense. What you can do is equip a sword (5AP) and a dagger (3AP), and if you have 8 AP per turn (1Dex=1AP), you can attack once with a sword, and once with a dagger. The Fallout style, basically.
| callehe wrote: | | Looking very good VD! |
Thanks
| Quote: | | Just one question, since it's 3d now, will all types of equipment be represented by character onscreen? |
All 25 weapons are modelled and would be shown on your character. Same goes for 4 shields types, 6 armor types (at the moment), 6 helmets, the hood, 4 plain clothes types (citizen, merchant, loremaster, nobleman), and that's pretty much it, I think. We have capes as an inventory items, but we haven't tried to model/animate them yet, and probably won't. Different metals (i.e. steel armor, bronze armor, iron sword, etc) would be shown too, so you can take a look at your opponent and figure out how tough he is, especially if you see that he's holding a 2H hammer in one hand :wink: _________________ Spazmo: Odds are, something you like very much sucks. Why? Because this is RPG Codex. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Vault Dweller Ubersturmfuhrer

Joined: 07 Jan 2003 Posts: 15337 Location: Vault 13
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Walks with the Snails wrote: | | I guess I have a certain fascination with the assassin. He still looks a little too... obvious. |
That's what I like about him too, and that's how it should be. Assassins operate openly, it's a respected craft. Think of lawyers, for example. They don't hide from you, they can be nice and pleasant, but the moment someone decides to sue you, that lawyer is after you. Nothing personal, it's business. Same here.
| Quote: | | He looks like a highwayman that prefers to strike at night. If that's a genuine character option, cool, then the armor is associated more with bandits rather than assassins. |
Depends on your assassin. You may have an assassin that poses as a noble or a loremaster (disguise skill kicks in) to slip poison like you said (a female can even do the poison kiss), whereas a fighting fella may decide that ambushing someone at night is the way to go. You may initiate conversations and lead your prey to a ruined building or outside the city walls, etc. _________________ Spazmo: Odds are, something you like very much sucks. Why? Because this is RPG Codex. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
OverrideB1


Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 443 Location: The other side of the mirror
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like the look of the Loremaster very much and the Heavy Fighter looks almost as cool.
I'm not sure about the Light Fighter though: that helm really does look oversized and heavy for a fighter that is basically relying on speed and desterity. Perhaps something like these might be better suited?
I like the Assassin, although I think that the outfit is a little too obvious. I've not finished reading all of the threads about AoD so I'm not sure if assassin is viewed as an "honourable" occupation or not. If it is, then there'd be no problem in going about dressed as an assassin ~ although I suspect that it would make most people very leery of speaking to you (or even approaching you). _________________
| Quote: | The true definition of an RPG:
The thing that makes an RPG an RPG is the Role Playing aspect. If you can play a character that evolves in any way, you have an RPG. Also dungeons...you can't have an RPG without dungeons. |
| Quote: | | BioWare did assure us, though, that every line of dialogue will still be recorded, so hardcore RPG fans can sit there and listen to every voice-acted word if they wish. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
ichpokhudezh

Joined: 09 Jul 2004 Posts: 179 Location: germantown, md
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 2:25 pm Post subject: Re: Characters in iso mode |
|
|
| Vault Dweller wrote: | | ichpokhudezh wrote: | This does not seem right to me.
Why would accuracy suffer as long as one is _able_ to hold & swing that thing? |
I'm not an expert, but it seems to me that it's much easier to hit something with what you can wield easily vs with what you can barely hold. The STR requirement doesn't mean that you can use a 2H weapon as easily as one can use a short sword. It means that you are stronger than most, but not a titan.
|
1. Wouldn't the same (progressive improvement in handling of a tool as one becomes more adapted/fit to use it) apply for a regular sword though? Why treat some other (while it might be longer and/or heavier) weapon differently?
2. I assume a 2h sword should already have pretty high Str requirement (above most). Double that makes you much more that "most" (the 'titan' could be too strong of a word, but an 'ogre' might fit).
| Vault Dweller wrote: |
| Quote: | | I was thinking double wield should suffer as well... |
There is no double wield in the traditional sense. What you can do is equip a sword (5AP) and a dagger (3AP), and if you have 8 AP per turn (1Dex=1AP), you can attack once with a sword, and once with a dagger.
|
So how do you figure that a char have 2h weapon equipped as 1h? By looking if they have a shield/an item equipped? _________________ @Tom's Hardware: ...hopes that Vista might be able to speed up applications are gone.
Last edited by ichpokhudezh on Tue Oct 25, 2005 2:50 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
hiciacit


Joined: 25 Aug 2005 Posts: 389
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looking very good overall! The only thing I don't like is whatever it is the assissin is holding. Looks like something to mow the lawn...
PS: Will the ability to wield a two-handed weapon dependent on the strength level? By this I mean a character with STR=8 would have a 30% skill penalty, but a character with STR=9 might have a 25% penalty. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Vault Dweller Ubersturmfuhrer

Joined: 07 Jan 2003 Posts: 15337 Location: Vault 13
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| hiciacit wrote: | | Looking very good overall! The only thing I don't like is whatever it is the assissin is holding. Looks like something to mow the lawn... |
It's a khopesh, Egyptian sickle-sword. Fits the period. Bonus against lightly armored opponents.
| Quote: | | PS: Will the ability to wield a two-handed weapon dependent on the strength level? By this I mean a character with STR=8 would have a 30% skill penalty, but a character with STR=9 might have a 25% penalty. |
Sure, good idea. _________________ Spazmo: Odds are, something you like very much sucks. Why? Because this is RPG Codex. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Vault Dweller Ubersturmfuhrer

Joined: 07 Jan 2003 Posts: 15337 Location: Vault 13
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 3:56 pm Post subject: Re: Characters in iso mode |
|
|
| ichpokhudezh wrote: | | 1. Wouldn't the same (progressive improvement in handling of a tool as one becomes more adapted/fit to use it) apply for a regular sword though? Why treat some other (while it might be longer and/or heavier) weapon differently? |
There is a difference between becoming better with certain things as reflected by skill values in games and using an object that's just too heavy to be used without restrictions. Your skills would reduce the penalty though, which is the best way to handle such things, imo.
| Quote: | | 2. I assume a 2h sword should already have pretty high Str requirement (above most). Double that makes you much more that "most" (the 'titan' could be too strong of a word, but an 'ogre' might fit). |
There are no Str requirements in the game. It's used now only to determine whether your character is strong enough to use a 2H weapon in one hand
| Quote: | | So how do you figure that a char have 2h weapon equipped as 1h? By looking if they have a shield/an item equipped? |
Each weapon model is unique. You've seen some screenshots, so I believe you saw the different models for short swort, sickle sword, curved sword, and 2H sword. In the game you'd recognize what characters are holding, as the weapon models are very distinctive. _________________ Spazmo: Odds are, something you like very much sucks. Why? Because this is RPG Codex. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Vault Dweller Ubersturmfuhrer

Joined: 07 Jan 2003 Posts: 15337 Location: Vault 13
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| OverrideB1 wrote: | | I like the look of the Loremaster very much and the Heavy Fighter looks almost as cool. |
Thanks
| Quote: | | I'm not sure about the Light Fighter though: that helm really does look oversized and heavy for a fighter that is basically relying on speed and desterity. |
It's very gladiatorish. I don't have my game files at work, so here is what a quick Google search brought me:
http://romegiftshop.com/thheii.html - it's looks too decorated as it's from a gift shop, but you get the idea. Here is that famous painting http://www.murphsplace.com/gladiator/glads.html - That's one big ass helmet, but hey, when in Rome...
| Quote: | | Perhaps something like these might be better suited? |
We have more traditional Roman/Greek helmets, we have 6 helmets in total now
| Quote: | | If it is, then there'd be no problem in going about dressed as an assassin ~ although I suspect that it would make most people very leery of speaking to you (or even approaching you). |
See the example above about lawyers. You don't jump and start running when one approaches you, do you? Yet you never know when one will strike.  _________________ Spazmo: Odds are, something you like very much sucks. Why? Because this is RPG Codex. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
ichpokhudezh

Joined: 09 Jul 2004 Posts: 179 Location: germantown, md
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:19 pm Post subject: Re: Characters in iso mode |
|
|
| Vault Dweller wrote: | There is a difference between becoming better with certain things as reflected by skill values in games and using an object that's just too heavy to be used without restrictions. Your skills would reduce the penalty though, which is the best way to handle such things, imo.
|
So, is a weak char penalized (skill/accuracy-wise) for wielding a long sword beyond the 'usual' Str-dependent damage penalty?
| Vault Dweller wrote: | | There are no Str requirements in the game. It's used now only to determine whether your character is strong enough to use a 2H weapon in one hand |
I've lost you, let me step back.
Are you saying that you haven't got Str requirements before (so anybody could use any weapon), but now you are introducing them into the system just to have players be able to one-hand-equip a 2h melee weapon?
| Vault Dweller wrote: |
| Quote: | | So how do you figure that a char have 2h weapon equipped as 1h? By looking if they have a shield/an item equipped? |
Each weapon model is unique. You've seen some screenshots, so I believe you saw the different models for short swort, sickle sword, curved sword, and 2H sword. In the game you'd recognize what characters are holding, as the weapon models are very distinctive. |
Oh, no, I meant how a player would specify via the interface whether he wants this 2h melee weapon (say, halberd, if you have them) wielded one-handedly or in both hands ('normally')? I don't think you could equip an item in Fallout in different ways ( e.g, a flamethrower). _________________ @Tom's Hardware: ...hopes that Vista might be able to speed up applications are gone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Vault Dweller Ubersturmfuhrer

Joined: 07 Jan 2003 Posts: 15337 Location: Vault 13
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:33 pm Post subject: Re: Characters in iso mode |
|
|
| ichpokhudezh wrote: | | So, is a weak char penalized (skill/accuracy-wise) for wielding a long sword beyond the 'usual' Str-dependent damage penalty? |
Str/Dex/Per values define the starting combat skill values. A strong character would start much more proficient in combat than a character focused on mental attributes. Later on skills development may erase the difference.
| Quote: | I've lost you, let me step back.
Are you saying that you haven't got Str requirements before (so anybody could use any weapon), but now you are introducing them into the system just to have players be able to one-hand-equip a 2h melee weapon? |
Yes. It's a thought, not a final feature yet. While the art guys are pumping out 3D stuff I'm playing with mechanics. The reason is, I hate artificial restrictions. I don't want to tell people "Thou shalt not use 2H weapons in one hand, because I, the almight designer, coded so" It should be a player's choice.
| Quote: | | Oh, no, I meant how a player would specify via the interface whether he wants this 2h melee weapon (say, halberd, if you have them) wielded one-handedly or in both hands ('normally')? I don't think you could equip an item in Fallout in different ways ( e.g, a flamethrower). |
Ah, I see. My mistake. Put something in another hand: shield, throwing net, medkit, dagger, etc _________________ Spazmo: Odds are, something you like very much sucks. Why? Because this is RPG Codex. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
ichpokhudezh

Joined: 09 Jul 2004 Posts: 179 Location: germantown, md
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 5:51 pm Post subject: Re: Characters in iso mode |
|
|
| Vault Dweller wrote: | | Quote: | | you haven't got Str requirements before (so anybody could use any weapon), but now you are introducing them into the system just to have players be able to one-hand-equip a 2h melee weapon? |
Yes. It's a thought, not a final feature yet. While the art guys are pumping out 3D stuff I'm playing with mechanics. The reason is, I hate artificial restrictions. I don't want to tell people "Thou shalt not use 2H weapons in one hand, because I, the almight designer, coded so" It should be a player's choice.
|
Hmm, so could the same principle applied in reverse? I.e. a char holding a dagger with two hands has a boost to skill/damage?
| Vault Dweller wrote: |
| Quote: | | how a player would specify via the interface whether he wants this 2h melee weapon (say, halberd, if you have them) wielded one-handedly |
Ah, I see. My mistake. Put something in another hand: shield, throwing net, medkit, dagger, etc |
How would one choose a combo of 2h-weapon held as 1h + HtH attack option? _________________ @Tom's Hardware: ...hopes that Vista might be able to speed up applications are gone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|