Jason
chasing a bee
<strong>[ Review ]</strong>
<p>Steve Butts took a gander at AGEOD's <strong><a href="http://shopus.ageod.com/game-description-World_War_One-662843.html" target="_blank">World War One</a></strong> and gave it a 5.2 in his <a href="http://pc.ign.com/articles/943/943069p1.html" target="_blank">IGN review</a>.</p><blockquote><p>The Great War is sadly neglected by strategy game developers. Though it lacks the dynamic military movements of certain other settings, it's rich in the other means of warfare -- diplomacy, economic pressure, technology, etc. World War One manages to include those elements, and all the military action besides, but whatever joys might be found in the setting or the game design are still obscured by incomplete documentation, a clumsy interface and a number of bugs. It's true that things have improved since the game was released late last year, but it's still a far ways from where it needs to be to justify your purchase.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Steve Butts took a gander at AGEOD's <strong><a href="http://shopus.ageod.com/game-description-World_War_One-662843.html" target="_blank">World War One</a></strong> and gave it a 5.2 in his <a href="http://pc.ign.com/articles/943/943069p1.html" target="_blank">IGN review</a>.</p><blockquote><p>The Great War is sadly neglected by strategy game developers. Though it lacks the dynamic military movements of certain other settings, it's rich in the other means of warfare -- diplomacy, economic pressure, technology, etc. World War One manages to include those elements, and all the military action besides, but whatever joys might be found in the setting or the game design are still obscured by incomplete documentation, a clumsy interface and a number of bugs. It's true that things have improved since the game was released late last year, but it's still a far ways from where it needs to be to justify your purchase.
</p></blockquote>