Rorschach said:
Longshanks said:
More butthurt over Bioware bashing? An opinion of a game is just as valid no matter how it was obtained. Whine about the stealing if you want, but it has nothing to do with the opinion. Any attempt to link the two comes off as an attempt to disregard an argument/opinion you have no counter to.
I didn't link the theft of the game to your opinion,
Others did.
Though, to be clear, it's not my opinion we're discussing. I've not pirated a Bioware game, nor have I pirated a game I did not want.
Rorschach said:
I just asked why you'd steal it if you didn't want it.
Don't know. Maybe said person felt there was some hope they'd enjoy it, even if small.
Rorschach said:
Whine about opinions all you want but it has nothing to do with the theft. Any link you make between the two is just an attempt to diregard the question at hand.
The discussion started out as "the opinion of those who pirate a game is worthless". This is a clear attempt to avoid discussion with those who have a different view. An analysis of a product is just as valid regardless of the means of obtainment (unless there are some questions about impartiality - eg. reviewing a car gifted to you by the manufacturer), note that many/most reviewers do not personally pay for the product they are reviewing.
As I said in my previous post. The theft/pirating/illegal downloading of the game is seperate to the opinion. Criticise the former all you like, but using it as an excuse to disregard opinion or analysis is just avoidance.
Rorschach said:
The only thing I have to say regarding the opinion thing is this: your opinion losses alot of weight when you have nothing to back it up. What I mean is the reason you expect a game to deliver is because you are going to pay for it; if you don't lose anything by the game sucking than the best you can say is "oh well, no harm to me"
A mostly valid point, but I feel much overplayed. As previously stated, the same can be said for pretty much all reviewers in any industry, as even if they are personally paying for a product, they are also being paid to review it, so the cost of it does not personally concern them. Discussion on the quality of a game, or other product, is not greatly effected by not having paid for it. In fact, it could be argued that those who purchase a game are likely to be less objective as they've invested more into it, possibly causing them to be overly harsh on a product (I paid $50 for this?) or overly generous (wanting their purchase to be justified). Does buying the game when it hits the bargain bin also reduce the weight of your opinion?
Rorschach said:
the worst you can say is "make a better fucking game for me to steal". It takes a real pretentious bastard to say the latter; Which most pirates do.
I agree with this. But again, the blame lies in the stealing, not the opinion that the game sucks. If the opinion can be backed up with solid reasoning, it is as valid as any other. It can be either refuted or agreed with, not dismissed on the basis of how the game was obtained.