Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Empire: Total War - opinions?

sheek

Arbiter
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
8,659
Location
Cydonia
Saw this on offer on Steam.

I have played Rome + the barbarian one, found the campaign side very bad, which ruined the tactical segments (preferred historical battles). And the AI wasn't very good.

Are the naval battles in this any good?
 

sheek

Arbiter
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
8,659
Location
Cydonia
T Cancer? Is it in the content section?


edit: nevermind

I thought Empire had an updated campaign system, because I remember seeing a similar genre game (18th century grand strategy) on here which showed details of your military reserves, # of men turning 18 this year, conscription rates etc.

After looking at all the gameplay videos it doesn't look like anything special, except maybe the naval battles.
 
Forest Dweller

Forest Dweller

Smoking Dicks
Joined
Oct 29, 2008
Messages
12,211
Yeah TCancer sucks. The own subforums of the Codex get more coverage on games that TCancer is supposed to be all about. Sorry babyarm, but you're wasting your time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom