Ban someone.

[DragoFireheart]

Someone needs to be banned but I'm not sure who. Codex, praise tell me who should be banned?

 

[~*´¨¯¨`*·~-.¸-AIN'T]

Oh what the hell, I'll do it

 

[Konjad]

Ban DragoFireheart

 

[oldmanpaco]

Free Jim Profit!

 

[Andyman Messiah]

Who are the contestants?

Also: yes, free Jim Profit. Whatever.

 

[Atheist]

Ban this *grabs dick*

 

[villain of the story]

I propose an arena type game for banning members. Every one willing suggests someone for banning. At the end of each month, the two most suggested members are given a subject to debate. Then, after a couple days of discuss!ing, the one the audience thinks is the more retarded one will then be banned for a month and the victor will decide on the subject of the next round, along with an immunity from being nominated for the next month.

If one is defeated for more than once, add +1 month per previous defeats to his ban. If one is victor for more than once, add +1 month per previous victories to his immunity.

Obviously, this will be a great device for people like Liberal to redeem themselves and remove the stigmas on themselves.

 

[Ermm]

Get Boilerplate back on Codex. I miss that crazy Looney Tune.

 

[SoupNazi]

I propose an arena type game for banning members. Every one willing suggests someone for banning. At the end of each month, the two most suggested members are given a subject to debate. Then, after a couple days of discuss!ing, the one the audience thinks is the more retarded one will then be banned for a month and the victor will decide on the subject of the next round, along with an immunity from being nominated for the next month.

If one is defeated for more than once, add +1 month per previous defeats to his ban. If one is victor for more than once, add +1 month per previous victories to his immunity.

Obviously, this will be a great device for people like Liberal to redeem themselves and remove the stigmas on themselves.

This is genius. Why did I ever think you were a retard?

 

[justheat]

I propose an arena type game for banning members. Every one willing suggests someone for banning. At the end of each month, the two most suggested members are given a subject to debate. Then, after a couple days of discuss!ing, the one the audience thinks is the more retarded one will then be banned for a month and the victor will decide on the subject of the next round, along with an immunity from being nominated for the next month.

If one is defeated for more than once, add +1 month per previous defeats to his ban. If one is victor for more than once, add +1 month per previous victories to his immunity.

Obviously, this will be a great device for people like Liberal to redeem themselves and remove the stigmas on themselves.

this fits into my project. i am capable of creating an arena already. 4 shot rule, 100 health each, each shot hurts for 25. we free-for-all.

although i want my first private test with others to include decent enemy ai so we can have an option of fighting or alliancing with bots.

 

[Tycn]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZtroc5NaZA

what the fuck Prosper

 

[Atheist]

roses are red
violets are blue
you are my favorite
touhou

 

[hanssolo]

Second thread requesting to be banned in as many months, drago?

 

[Konjad]

just ban drago

 

[DragoFireheart]

I propose an arena type game for banning members. Every one willing suggests someone for banning. At the end of each month, the two most suggested members are given a subject to debate. Then, after a couple days of discuss!ing, the one the audience thinks is the more retarded one will then be banned for a month and the victor will decide on the subject of the next round, along with an immunity from being nominated for the next month.

If one is defeated for more than once, add +1 month per previous defeats to his ban. If one is victor for more than once, add +1 month per previous victories to his immunity.

Obviously, this will be a great device for people like Liberal to redeem themselves and remove the stigmas on themselves.

I fully support this idea.

Mods, is there anyone we can implement this? A battle of merit to decide who gets banned and who shouldn't?

 

[curry]

I propose an arena type game for banning members. Every one willing suggests someone for banning. At the end of each month, the two most suggested members are given a subject to debate. Then, after a couple days of discuss!ing, the one the audience thinks is the more retarded one will then be banned for a month and the victor will decide on the subject of the next round, along with an immunity from being nominated for the next month.

If one is defeated for more than once, add +1 month per previous defeats to his ban. If one is victor for more than once, add +1 month per previous victories to his immunity.

Obviously, this will be a great device for people like Liberal to redeem themselves and remove the stigmas on themselves.

how about the one who suggest someone to be banned has to face him in a poll? and the loser gets a ban

 

[Xor]

Really, with the ignore list, there isn't much of a reason to ban anyone unless they start spamming or something.

 

[commie]

Ban justheat and all the other Prosper alts. He isn't even trying anymore.

 

[Jaime Lannister]

Ban justheat and all the other Prosper alts. He isn't even trying anymore.

^implying he ever was