Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Preview 1UP Complains About Hellgate: London

Sol Invictus

Erudite
Joined
Oct 19, 2002
Messages
9,614
Location
Pax Romana
Tags: Flagship Studios; Hellgate: London

1UP has written up a short <a href=http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?cId=3141562>preview</a> of Hellgate: London. The preview is 4 paragraphs short and doesn't contain any useful information, but it does contain a little complaint about the game's first person viewpoint. Here's a couple of interesting paragraphs from the preview centered on the complaint:
<br>
<blockquote>We're looking forward to that, because while Flagship's design pedigree and the near-future, demon-plagued London setting give us tremendous hope, we have some serious questions about this game: If it's not an action-oriented RPG (e.g., the weird modifiable guns in the game are generally "sticky," homing in on a target), then why mandate a locked-in FPS-style viewpoint? If you're aiming to re-create the phat lewt carrot-on-a-stick gameplay that propelled the Diablo games to success, then why won't you allow players to see their increasingly cool characters in anything other than a menu screen?
<br>
<br>
OK, so we're a little fixated on the near-total lack of a third-person view (it does switch up during melee combat), but it implies a somewhat deficient generosity of spirit. Gamers enjoy seeing their developing characters kick ass--or at least they like the choice of whether they get to see that--and if success in the game is going to boil down to dice rolling instead of twitch skills, why not let gamers see something more than their guns' brilliantly colored light beams smack a demon down during that dice roll? Vampire: The Masquerade—Bloodlines made it work (more or less), and that game did depend on twitch skills for success.</blockquote>
<br>
What do you think?
<br>
<br>
Personally, I don't know how valid their complaint is, because as I understand, if you equip a melee weapon and a gun at the same time, the game will switch into third person, so what's to say that you can't play with ranged weaponry in third person mode?
<br>
<br>
Oh yeah, the preview appears to be <B>OLD</b>.
<br>
<Blockquote>Flagship's first release can make a first-person RPG fun to play--and that's what we're hoping to discover at E3, where Hellgate: London will be available for hands-on play.</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Source/Shameless Plug: <a href=http://www.co8.org>Circle of Eight</a>
 

Astromarine

Erudite
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
2,213
Location
Switzerland
Look, Ex, usually I leave you alone and dislike the level of abuse directed at you, but seriously: Source: Circle of Eight? So you are writing a story in the Codex whose source is the exact same story YOU wrote in your own site?

I mean, do you do these things on purpose to bring on the hilarity?
 

Sol Invictus

Erudite
Joined
Oct 19, 2002
Messages
9,614
Location
Pax Romana
It's invalid because it's an old complaint and if you saw the E3 video you'd know that you can shoot guns in 3rd person.
 

Saint_Proverbius

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
12,094
Location
Behind you.
"Shameless plug" always makes me giggle like a school girl.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom