South Asia is like a loser who gave up, pulled his pants down, and bent over. A long train of people got in line, from the Arabs to the Turkish Mongols of Timur to the Mughals to the British and so on.
-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
rpgcodex > the threads can be improved by adding more replies
Wyrmlord
Wyrmlord
One can't really blame the British for simply having been more efficient at a game that everyone else was playing.
FreeKaner
I understand that British were just playing the colonialism game like everything else. You can still individually judge their impact without laying particular blame on them.
For example I think Turks presence in Arab lands was ineffective at best, crippling at worst because of their lack of interest in administrating those provinces despite them being Muslim as well.
For example I think Turks presence in Arab lands was ineffective at best, crippling at worst because of their lack of interest in administrating those provinces despite them being Muslim as well.
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.