Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Recent content by Terelyn

  1. NWN2 OC was not bad as people make it out

    OC had problems with the influence system, but MotB doesn't, IMO. Dux seems to be mostly complaining about the short campaign's constricted and fairly linear narrative. I didn't feel that the main narrative was overbearing, because it's suppose to be it's main appeal, as there's little side...
  2. NWN2 OC was not bad as people make it out

    It's their style. What's your problem with the companion influence system? They are/were better, than many of their contemporaries. Even if you didn't like PoE, we shouldn't diminish their past merits because of their recent titles.
  3. NWN2 OC was not bad as people make it out

    The first has more truth to it. MotB is one of their best, along with KotOR 2.
  4. NWN2 OC was not bad as people make it out

    I don't understand it either... If it feels like a chore to you, play Bethesda games instead. :roll:
  5. NWN2 OC was not bad as people make it out

    That's a very specific scenario. From what i can remember, it has only been rehashed in PoE. It's not a well-known formula in CRPGs.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom