Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Recent content by SpurdoSparde

  1. SpurdoSparde

    RPG Codex Interview: Chris Avellone on Pillars Cut Content, Game Development Hierarchies and More

    The obsession with romances as the only type of relationship is a long time pet peeve of mine and probably others as well. If there was actually a wide range of relationships then people infatuated with romances might realize there is more to companions than that. It could even quell the hate...
  2. SpurdoSparde

    RPG Codex Interview: Chris Avellone on Pillars Cut Content, Game Development Hierarchies and More

    It would be easier getting MCA's lawyer to start posting in this thread than guessing the circumstances of this de-ownering, although probably less fun.
  3. SpurdoSparde

    RPG Codex Interview: Chris Avellone on Pillars Cut Content, Game Development Hierarchies and More

    Non-compete agreements are legal within reasonable boundaries. I don't know about the US specifically but the limitations are usually that the definition can't be too broad and the timeframe has to be proportional with the compensation given for signing the agreement.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom