Esquilax
Arcane
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2010
- Messages
- 4,833
I'm going to vote C>A1. We can't afford to let Xuxian's powers get wasted, and though I'd prefer to just book it out of here (relatively little risk to us, Xuxian's power is saved, he has no restriction on reteaching the stuff) that's obviously not going to win and A1 looks like the least stupid way out of this. The Abbot is strong enough to take the blows (remember how Xu Jing's claws intended to tear through tendons like tissue paper didn't even break through Guo Fu's skin, and that was when he wasn't using protective techniques?) while Jing's maimed or killed at least one person for most of the tag teams he's faced since the earliest days of his training, especially when he faces many at once.
Thanks for the old-school brofist, but to be fair, Guo Fu was using a protective technique. In fact, it's the same defensive technique that the Shaolin are famous for, the Jinzhongzhao.
Well, more to the point, our Wuying Leipo Kick usually proves to be a technique that works well against formations by catching them off-guard. We also have master-level unarmed skill which improves our ability to face a large formation like this. Xuxian might be able to beat the formation, but I have my doubts about him doing so without harming them.
As for a test of restraint, I don't think we can both hold back against the Abbot and subdue him. We're not that good. In the end, facing the abbot is bait for us to be drawn into a serious fight where we get sloppy about the "no harming others" rule. When it comes down to it, I think Xuxian benefits more from confronting a single resilient opponent than us.
With regards to Xuxian's personal journey, Xuxian injured the abbot when he escaped. He also needs to prove himself to the abbot. I think the fight with the abbot should be his.
When have we ever used the Wuying Leipo Kick to break formations, and when has it ever been described as a formation-breaking techniuque? I mean, I dunno, maybe it is, but this is just pure conjecture on your part. Likewise, you could use the master level Unarmed Skill argument to say that it improves our ability to fight the Abbot using lethal techniques without harming him, but it's really besides the point, because of course MOAR skill is better.
If I were arguing in favour of A2, and I am getting close to flopping, here is what I would say: unlike the Abbot, who is a huge mountain of swole with greater inner strength than us, we can probably replicate the 18-man formation that the monks use without having to resort to qi draining first thanks to Wuxiang Qiankun. Likewise, just because Xuxian fucked up and panicked earlier doesn't mean he'll do so again: his behaviour since then indicates that he's become far better at controlling his abilities, though of course this will be by far his biggest test so far. Another big hint is within an interpretation of the update, related to Shaolin Temple precedent and Xuxian's first fight with the Abbot:
“Trial by combat. First, face the Eighteen Bronze Arhat Formation, and then battle the current Abbot. Huichan was the first in temple history to convince an Abbot in such a trial.” Then he adds, with a wry smile, “After that, Fangzhang followed suit, and was the only one to ever actually defeat a presiding Abbot soundly.”
...
“Didn’t you beat the Abbot before? Just go even more lightly on him this time around,” you whisper.
“I am pretty sure he was holding back at the time,” mutters Xuxian nervously. “To take both him and the Eighteen Arhats on without injuring any of them… I don’t know if I can do that.”
The Shaolin value their principles and traditions above everything, so rather than amping up the intensity and potentially harming Xuxian, which would bring shame on Shaolin's teachings, the Abbot decided that it would be better to purposely lose and be harmed by Xuxian than it would be to inflict harm on Xuxian. This seems to suggest that if we attack the Abbot with too much aggression, he may simply let us harm him or put himself in a vulnerable position to test how merciful we truly are.
The update also seems to imply that succeeding in the trial and defeating the Abbot soundly are two different things, based on the different accounts of Huichan and the late Abbot Fangzhang. treave, what was the difference between their performance in the trials that they faced? As I understood it, while Huichan came out victorious, he had a significantly harder time of the trial, and perhaps the Abbot of his day allowed him a victory when he showed that he was sufficiently skilled and controlled. On the other hand, Fangzhang managed to outdo his predecessor by outclassing his Abbot completely without harming him at all. Am I getting it right? If that's the case, then it implies that succeeding in the trial and beating the challenges soundly are two very different things.
According to the update, the abbot and the eighteen bronze arhats are roughly equal in difficulty. Furthermore, Xu Jing has some difficulty controlling his strength. Therefore, Xu Jing should face the resilient abbot instead of the eighteen bronze arhats.
The problem is that this argument can be read both ways depending on which choice you're invested in.