Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Fallout Autumn Leaves mod for Fallout: New Vegas

Mozg

Arcane
Joined
Oct 20, 2015
Messages
2,033
I forget what the guy that made the Codex comics in gary's mod is named now because I think that dude is the most likely Codexer to have actually played both.
 

Infinitron

I post news
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
97,490
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
I forget what the guy that made the Codex comics in gary's mod is named now because I think that dude is the most likely Codexer to have actually played both.

Whu - Admiral Jimbob?
 

Mozg

Arcane
Joined
Oct 20, 2015
Messages
2,033
Yeah that's the dude I think, he posted in the AL thread
 

Wayward Son

Fails to keep valuable team members alive
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
1,866,294
Location
Anytown, USA
If the quests are really that similar, the modder should sue Bethesda for plagiarism.
Can he?
Well, I mean, people have sued for far stupider things and the guy did do unpaid work that was digitally released, the concept itself was then used in a product that was distributed for money, there's probably a case in there somewhere. Don't take my word for it though, I'm no lawyer.
 

Mustawd

Guest
If he used Bethesda's engine he's probably F'ed when it comes to ways to sue. I would imagine that in the LUA there is some fine print that says "anything you create with our tools and using our game are subject to our ownership if need be".
 

Infinitron

I post news
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
97,490
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
Of course there are no grounds for suing. There are however grounds for publicly shaming Bethesda so that they at least offer some belated credit.
 

Mustawd

Guest
From the EULA:

If you create levels, add-on packs, sequels or other items to the Software using the SOFTWARE's level editor, if any, including the construction of new levels (collectively, the "Modifications"), you are subject to the following restrictions: (i) the SOFTWARE's level editor and associated development tools and documentation (collectively "SDK") are considered separate from the SOFTWARE in the sense that they are not guaranteed or supported by the OWNER. However, the OWNER retains all copyrights and intellectual rights to the SDK, as stated in this license. (ii) your Modifications must require a full, registered copy of the Software to run; (iii) you may not distribute a Modification that contains an executable file which has been changed or modified in any way; (iv) your Modifications must not contain any libelous, defamatory or other illegal material, material that is scandalous or invades the rights of privacy or publicity of any third party, or contain any trademarks, copyright-protected work or other property of third parties; (v) your Modifications must be distributed solely for free. Neither you nor any other person or party may sell them to anyone, commercially exploit them in any way, or charge anyone for using them without a license from the OWNER. OWNER encourages non-commercial distribution of quality Modifications; and (vi) your Modifications shall not be technically or otherwise supported in any manner by the OWNER. The prohibitions and restrictions in this Section apply to anyone in possession of the Software or any of your Modifications. As to the extent permitted by the applicable laws, YOU ARE NOT PERMITTED TO REVERSE ENGINEER, DECOMPILE OR DISASSEMBLE THE SOFTWARE IN ANY WAY. Any copying of the SOFTWARE or ACCOMPANYING MATERIALS not specifically allowed in this Agreement is a violation of this Agreement.


I would read this as: Bethesda basically owns anything you create and distribute as a mod, if they so choose. In addition, you probably couldn't claim the mod, in terms of storyline and characters, is "your IP" because you've made it in the FALLOUT universe.
 

Spectacle

Arcane
Patron
Joined
May 25, 2006
Messages
8,363
Modders own copyright to the plot of any mods they create, even if they use bethesda tools, so i believe this is a valid case of plagiarism. It's going to take a court case to settle things though, which is why I'd like the modder to sue.
 

Lhynn

Arcane
Joined
Aug 28, 2013
Messages
9,854
Modders own copyright to the plot of any mods they create, even if they use bethesda tools, so i believe this is a valid case of plagiarism. It's going to take a court case to settle things though, which is why I'd like the modder to sue.
Rather the modder get hired by bethsoft, then we wont have 1, but 2 guys that know what the hell they are doing there.
 

pippin

Guest
On the other hand, an Oblivion modder got hired by Obsidian once (or so I heard).
I think it could be the necessary pinch of pepper for a great bowl of drama soup when it comes to modding Bethesda games, though.
 

Mustawd

Guest
Modders own copyright to the plot of any mods they create, even if they use bethesda tools, so i believe this is a valid case of plagiarism.

Not if the Mod is set in an owned universe, which is of course Fallout.
 

racofer

Thread Incliner
Joined
Apr 5, 2008
Messages
25,626
Location
Your ignore list.
AKUGqpj.gif
 

Konjad

Patron
Joined
Nov 3, 2007
Messages
4,086
Location
Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming! Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
If he used Bethesda's engine he's probably F'ed when it comes to ways to sue. I would imagine that in the LUA there is some fine print that says "anything you create with our tools and using our game are subject to our ownership if need be".
Of course it does. Everything you make in Construction Set is a property of Bethesda. It's the same everywhere - everything you make in mod toolset (forgot the name) for NWN is Bioware's and so on. Otherwise you could make money selling your mods.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom