I will do this if TripJack's post gets over 100 such awards.
You have my sword.
I will do this if TripJack's post gets over 100 such awards.
I will do this if TripJack's post gets over 100 such awards.
I'm sure this post has nothing to do with the fact Participation Award button is linked to a bitcoin miner.
I don't know where or when participation awards started (they weren't around when I was a kid), but they've become more and more common over the past 25 years or so, at least in the U.S.
They originate in the idea that competition is mean, and hurts the kids who don't win. Since it's bad to feel bad because someone else is better than you are, you should get an award just for showing up. It's supposed to make kids with no talent feel better about themselves. If you belong to a basketball team that loses every game by 50 points, you still get a participation award.
Around here a participation award means your post is being insulted as not adding anything of value.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...t-let-his-sons-accept-participation-trophies/
Done!I will do this if TripJack's post gets over 100 such awards.
As you are me and I am you, therefore you need only grant it to yourself.Also, this inherently entails granting me the goldfist button, for obvious reasons.
That's not true, unless your definition of "participation" is different than it actually is. Rating posts is participation enough not only by the definition of the word but also by the events unfolded here.In fact, only people who posted in this thread should be able to give participation awards. You know, 'cause only they participated.
Codex welcomes trannies with any kind of hair with open arms."Trophies for everyone" is how we ended up with dangerhaired polysexual tranny fags everywhere in the first place