You say that like its a bad thing.are d&d writers continually on acid? imagine that every single thing I've posted has its own rules, descriptions of appearance, powers, origins, sometimes even mating habits
You don't have to really "justify" that. It was a thing a character said. Do people in real life always say things that are factually correct and logically coherent, or do they frequently utter things which are bullshit? You're dealing with a thing said by a shady character: Are such people generally reliable narrators? Or do they bullshit and exaggerate their abilities often?it gets way worse though when you're playing with the sort of nerds that tried to justify han solo when he said that millenium falcon can make the kessel run in less than 12 parsecs and apply the same sort of retarded logic to explain the existence of ridiculousness like rust monsters, living ceilings, and tree stumps with rabbit-like growths on them instead of just having fun
Spacerhobo.Do people in real life always say things that are factually correct and logically coherentit gets way worse though when you're playing with the sort of nerds that tried to justify han solo when he said that millenium falcon can make the kessel run in less than 12 parsecs and apply the same sort of retarded logic to explain the existence of ridiculousness like rust monsters, living ceilings, and tree stumps with rabbit-like growths on them instead of just having fun
The correct word isn't on acid, the correct word is an artistic talent. You know some artist have talent without being on acid.You say that like its a bad thing.are d&d writers continually on acid? imagine that every single thing I've posted has its own rules, descriptions of appearance, powers, origins, sometimes even mating habits
The truly horrifying part is that someone has almost succeeded at making the depiction sell the idea.
And some behave as if on acid without displaying artistic talent.The correct word isn't on acid, the correct word is an artistic talent. You know some artist have talent without being on acid.You say that like its a bad thing.are d&d writers continually on acid? imagine that every single thing I've posted has its own rules, descriptions of appearance, powers, origins, sometimes even mating habits
A wizard did it. I mean, think about it. You're a wizard. The laws of reality are your bitch. If you want to make a creature that consists of nothing but fractal dicks, who's stopping you? Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for you are flammable and conduct electricity.Someone explain to me how something like this would have evolved.
The bodies of the Oard are only partially flesh and blood, with the remainder being composed of high tech machinery and electronic circuits. Each Oard is nearly identical in appearance.
They appear in an adventure (CM6 Where Chaos Reigns) where their time-traveling agents have altered the history of a world at key moments and the PCs need to travel back in time to those same moments and stop the Oard from changing history.
Man, D&D writers never stop ripping off other franchises. I hate it when they do that, it's just so... wait, this adventure was published in May 1985?
Oh.
Last time I checked this motherfuck didn't go around strangling people to death. And it could fly.You obviously had no childhood.
Owlbears are for wimps. Feast your eyes on this leopard-snake hybrid that someone clearly thought made a bunch of sense after dropping acid:
image upload no ads
You have...you have SEEN the internet, haven't you? And you still think that the problem with that creature is, in a setting where 'powerful liches/mages/whatever' periodically design and create abominations, that nobody would create a tiger with a bunch of snakes coming out of it, instead of it not being a bunch of enormous cocks?