Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Odds are, something you like very much sucks. Why? Because this is the RPG Codex
News Content People Games Companies Links IRC RSS Staff Contact Us!  
The Codex Forums FAQ Search Memberlist Usergroups Register Profile Log in to check your private messages Ignore List Log in  

Check-out Codex Merchandise - Buy stuff from Amazon - Link Converter
T-Shirt Hell | Amazon.com | Amazon.ca | Amazon.co.uk | Amazon.de | Fishpond.co.nz
(buying stuff via the above links helps us pay the hosting bills)
Support RPG Codex
Donate and get rid
of these pesky ads!
Visit the RPGCodex store @ CafePress!
Codex T-Shirts
RPG Codex :: Latest News   Tacticular Cancer :: Latest News
Visit the RPGCodex store @ CafePress!
Codex Mugs

Putting Holes in Stuff the JE Sawyer Way

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Codex Forums -> RPG Codex News & Content Comments
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jason
chasing a bee
chasing a bee


Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Posts: 8982
Location: baby arm fantasy island


PostPosted: Sun May 02, 2010 10:31 pm    Post subject: Putting Holes in Stuff the JE Sawyer Way Report this post / user! Reply with quote

Obsidian's J.E. Sawyer let it be known that damage threshold is returning to the Fallout series with Fallout: New Vegas.
Imagine that there is an amount of damage that armor directly subtracts from damage... a "threshold" of damage, if you will. While a small percentage of damage may get through even the thickest armor, damage threshold can effectively neutralize a lot of small arms. Fallout 1 and 2 used numerical feedback to let the player know when their weapons weren't doing any damage. In F3 and F:NV, the player only sees enemy health meters that represent a percentage of total health rather than an exact value. This makes it difficult to tell how effective an enemy's armor is (as opposed to the target simply having a ton of health). In F:NV, the red shield appears next to a target's health meter when you hit it for damage that is equal to or less than the target's damage threshold. A HUD-colored shield appears next to the player's health meter when the player is hit for damage equal to or less than the player's damage threshold.

High RoF weapons typically have a low DAM, high DPS. E.g. 10mm SMG. Low RoF weapons are the opposite. E.g. Hunting Rifle. F:NV's Pip-Boy Weapons tab now cross-fades between DAM and DPS so the player can make more tactical choices about what weapon to use in any given circumstance. Having both of these values visible has also allowed us to revise the calculation of DAM/DPS values to be less abstract and more accurate. Using the weapons previously listed, a 10mm SMG would be best against unarmored/lightly armored targets at close range. The Hunting Rifle is ideal against armored targets at long range. But if the player wants to get fiddly with numbers, the Cowboy Repeater (mentioned in the Escapist preview) is better than either weapon against unarmored/lightly armored targets at long range since it is accurate, has a decent DAM and a better DPS than the Hunting Rifle. Add ammo subtypes and mods into the mix and there are a lot of ways to optimize the gear you carry and use.

Thanks to Ausir for pointing this out
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
SerratedBiz
 
 


Joined: 04 Mar 2009
Posts: 772
Location: Multiheaded monkeys


PostPosted: Sun May 02, 2010 11:02 pm    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

So we introduced this cool mechanic that ensured you would need to use different weapons to approach different challenges, and then we made sure we included a weapon that was powerful enough to invalidate this increase in difficulty.

/codex
_________________
Nobody knows what it's like to be a dustbin in Shaftsbury with hooligans.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Awor Szurkrarz
 
 


Joined: 11 Dec 2009
Posts: 2909


PostPosted: Sun May 02, 2010 11:29 pm    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

I wish developers would start to use RL as an inspiration. With weapons having functions and parameters based on RL ones, not on their weird ideas.
After all, all these weapons were developed for a purpose. They wouldn't be produced and sold if there would be one type of a weapon for all situations.
_________________
Kszarzahrl

tunguska wrote:
Shooting young children in the groin with a high caliber firearm is possible in real life. So why not make it possible in the game? Bethesda/Zenimax makes me sick. Total dickwads who only care about money. I'd like to mod the game to include nuking kindergartens and nursery schools and grammar schools and blowing up school buses with grenades. Little children are a lot of fun to slaughter. I could almost never make it through Fallout without a "child killer" tag. It's just sooo delicious and irresistible to blow them away. I'm one of the few who would actually like to do this in real life as well. But the point of a game is to live out a fantasy that you cannot in real life. Like killing hundreds of people is okay, but a single child? No way! That's sick! Give me a break.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bhlaab
 
 


Joined: 19 Nov 2008
Posts: 1323


PostPosted: Sun May 02, 2010 11:57 pm    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

SerratedBiz wrote:
So we introduced this cool mechanic that ensured you would need to use different weapons to approach different challenges, and then we made sure we included a weapon that was powerful enough to invalidate this increase in difficulty.

/codex


Which weapon is that?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
treave
 
 


Joined: 06 Jul 2008
Posts: 1685


PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:38 am    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

bhlaab wrote:
SerratedBiz wrote:
So we introduced this cool mechanic that ensured you would need to use different weapons to approach different challenges, and then we made sure we included a weapon that was powerful enough to invalidate this increase in difficulty.

/codex


Which weapon is that?


JE Sawyer wrote:
Using the weapons previously listed, a 10mm SMG would be best against unarmored/lightly armored targets at close range. The Hunting Rifle is ideal against armored targets at long range. But if the player wants to get fiddly with numbers, the Cowboy Repeater (mentioned in the Escapist preview) is better than either weapon against unarmored/lightly armored targets at long range since it is accurate, has a decent DAM and a better DPS than the Hunting Rifle.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ausir
The Vault Overseer
The Vault Overseer


Joined: 21 Oct 2002
Posts: 2202
Location: Poland


PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:48 am    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

Now read with a bit of comprehenshion.

Quote:
Using the weapons previously listed, a 10mm SMG would be best against unarmored/lightly armored targets at close range. The Hunting Rifle is ideal against armored targets at long range. But if the player wants to get fiddly with numbers, the Cowboy Repeater (mentioned in the Escapist preview) is better than either weapon against unarmored/lightly armored targets at long range since it is accurate, has a decent DAM and a better DPS than the Hunting Rifle.

_________________
The Vault - Fallout Wiki * Alpha Protocol Wiki * Fallout: New Vegas * * Star Wars: The Old Republic Wiki
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
treave
 
 


Joined: 06 Jul 2008
Posts: 1685


PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 2:05 am    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

I stand corrected.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Norfleet
 
 


Joined: 03 Jun 2005
Posts: 1149


PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 2:17 am    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

There's also the fact that, traditionally in Fallout, the 10mm and the hunting rifle represent bottom of the food chain in their respective weapon classes, so you WOULD expect to find weapons that are better than them in every way.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sovy Kurosei
-
-


Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 1518


PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 3:43 am    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

Quote:
Fallout 1 and 2 used numerical feedback to let the player know when their weapons weren't doing any damage. In F3 and F:NV, the player only sees enemy health meters that represent a percentage of total health rather than an exact value. This makes it difficult to tell how effective an enemy's armor is (as opposed to the target simply having a ton of health).


If the enemies have so much health that the player can't tell if the enemy is immune to their bullets or just has swimming pools of hit points then I think they have completely different problem on their hands.

Protip: Nobody likes plugging away ten minutes on a bad guy with a move set that can be figured out in ten seconds.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
SerratedBiz
 
 


Joined: 04 Mar 2009
Posts: 772
Location: Multiheaded monkeys


PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 4:05 am    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

Ausir wrote:
Now read with a bit of comprehenshion.

Quote:
Using the weapons previously listed, a 10mm SMG would be best against unarmored/lightly armored targets at close range. The Hunting Rifle is ideal against armored targets at long range. But if the player wants to get fiddly with numbers, the Cowboy Repeater (mentioned in the Escapist preview) is better than either weapon against unarmored/lightly armored targets at long range since it is accurate, has a decent DAM and a better DPS than the Hunting Rifle.


Point taken. But when you say it's effective against -light- armor (so it does have armor penetration), and at the same time saying "better DPS", I'm not so sure the line is as clear as you make it to be.
_________________
Nobody knows what it's like to be a dustbin in Shaftsbury with hooligans.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Clockwork Knight
 
 


Joined: 06 May 2009
Posts: 10763
Location: Fighting rats inside my anus


PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 6:53 am    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

Better DPS = Higher rate of fire. Doesn't imply it's good against armored targets (I'm assuming "armored" means heavy / medium armor, which is what the Hunting Rifle is good against). The SMG has huge DPS and still is a bad choice against armored targets due to each bullet causing less damage (thus, being resisted by the threshold).

Way I see it, the Cowbow Repeater is better than both against unarmored / light armored targets at long range because the SMG is bad at long range, and while the Hunting Rifle CAN hit targets at long range, the unecessary extra force and the lower rate of fire makes it an obvious bad choice compared to the CR.

Meanwhile, the SMG is better than both at close range if there's no threshold in the way. The distinction is quite clear.
_________________
nomask7 wrote:
If you've ever worked in a kindergarten, you've probably noticed how one child sometimes begins to chant something, such as "all bears are toys, all bears are toys", then other children will join in with him, so that after a while every child in the room is chanting, "all bears are toys, all bears are toys." You might put in, "No they are not. That one in the picture, for example." They would continue, "all bears are toys, all bears are toys."

That really happens, and quite often too. It's also exactly how adults in academia think and behave most of the time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DraQ
 
 


Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 9669


PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 11:15 am    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

Damage threshold is a very good mechanics, a huge incline compared to most of modern faggotry and I'm more than happy to see it back, but the armour systems shouldn't stop there - kinetic projectiles could be given velocity, mass, AP modifiers to account for their shape and construction (currently dumb, handcoded ones), and drag modifiers to account for them losing velocity and possibly tumbling. Other weapons could be parametrized as well, or their shots be made as compound objects, using multiple simple effects to simulate complex ones. I'm thinking of something like Cortex Command, only refined, more complex, 3D, but without the computationally expensive pixel physics.

Red shield icon, on the other hand is rather fail. PnP RPGs are mostly interface and storytelling, with simplistic mechanics and almost no presentation. Computers on the other hand excel at complex, simulative mechanics and stunning presentation - would it be so hard to shift no penetration feedback from interface (icon) to showing that the projectiles bounce harmlessly of target's armour and the target doesn't even flinch?
_________________
Be vewy vewy quiet, I'm twolling wetawds.
----------------------------------------

Andhaira wrote:
You are a moron who's constant spamming and pointless views do not count.

----------------------------------------
Kaiserin wrote:
I actually kind of agree with the sentiment that primates are prone to bad habits. It's definitely part of what made us successful, but it's still kind of a travesty that the first species to take tool use to these heights had to be part of the great ape family. Life is savage though I guess...

Salute
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
1eyedking
 
 


Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 2543
Location: Argentina


PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 11:58 am    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

DraQ wrote:
Damage threshold is a very good mechanics, a huge incline compared to most of modern faggotry and I'm more than happy to see it back, but the armour systems shouldn't stop there - kinetic projectiles could be given velocity, mass, AP modifiers to account for their shape and construction (currently dumb, handcoded ones), and drag modifiers to account for them losing velocity and possibly tumbling. Other weapons could be parametrized as well, or their shots be made as compound objects, using multiple simple effects to simulate complex ones. I'm thinking of something like Cortex Command, only refined, more complex, 3D, but without the computationally expensive pixel physics.

Would be cool but it's bad design all over, sends the KISS principle to shit.
_________________
Stuff:
Alpha Popamole Official Guide
Icewind Dale II Random Loot Tables
The Definitive Icewind Dale II Extended XP Table
Arcanum Balanced XP Cap Remover
Why The Witcher is an intelligent game
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
roll-a-die
 
 


Joined: 27 Sep 2009
Posts: 1783


PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:12 pm    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

1eyedking wrote:

Would be cool but it's bad design all over, sends the KISS principle to shit.


Not to mention it would be HELL to actually code. And would screw up the encapsulation principle so bad it's not even funny.
_________________
Colbert wrote:
Belgian's are a dirty thieving people, drink Bud Light.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DraQ
 
 


Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 9669


PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:17 pm    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

1eyedking wrote:
Would be cool but it's bad design all over, sends the KISS principle to shit.
So does the KISS prinicple being formulated too confusingly for you to grasp what it is and where it is applicable.

roll-a-die wrote:
Not to mention it would be HELL to actually code.
And hilariously easy to code content for later on.
No free lunch, you see.

Quote:
And would screw up the encapsulation principle so bad it's not even funny.
How so?
_________________
Be vewy vewy quiet, I'm twolling wetawds.
----------------------------------------

Andhaira wrote:
You are a moron who's constant spamming and pointless views do not count.

----------------------------------------
Kaiserin wrote:
I actually kind of agree with the sentiment that primates are prone to bad habits. It's definitely part of what made us successful, but it's still kind of a travesty that the first species to take tool use to these heights had to be part of the great ape family. Life is savage though I guess...

Salute
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
praetor
 
 


Joined: 27 Apr 2009
Posts: 212
Location: Vhoorl


PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:21 pm    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

Clockwork Knight wrote:
Better DPS = Higher rate of fire.


no. DPS=/=ROF.

a weapon with 50 points of damage/shot that fires 1 shot every second would have a better DPS but lower ROF than a weapon that fires 20 shots/sec with each dealing 2 points of damage
_________________
I vino veritas... in vagina penis.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Luzur
 
 


Joined: 12 Feb 2009
Posts: 9228
Location: Sweden


PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:22 pm    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

Cowboy Repeater.

now thats a gay name for a gun.
_________________
"Churchill and Roosevelt are sitting over there in their plutocratic little world, behind the scene, the jews run their show. I have my people behind me."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Clockwork Knight
 
 


Joined: 06 May 2009
Posts: 10763
Location: Fighting rats inside my anus


PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:35 pm    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

praetor wrote:
Clockwork Knight wrote:
Better DPS = Higher rate of fire.


no. DPS=/=ROF.

a weapon with 50 points of damage/shot that fires 1 shot every second would have a better DPS but lower ROF than a weapon that fires 20 shots/sec with each dealing 2 points of damage


Hm, that's right. Brain fart induced by imagining the weapon effects on armored targets. Rest of the post should be right, though.
_________________
nomask7 wrote:
If you've ever worked in a kindergarten, you've probably noticed how one child sometimes begins to chant something, such as "all bears are toys, all bears are toys", then other children will join in with him, so that after a while every child in the room is chanting, "all bears are toys, all bears are toys." You might put in, "No they are not. That one in the picture, for example." They would continue, "all bears are toys, all bears are toys."

That really happens, and quite often too. It's also exactly how adults in academia think and behave most of the time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
spacemoose
 
 


Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 9200
Location: california


PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 1:01 pm    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

stay tuned for next weeks episode: "putting stuff in holes the chris avellone way"
_________________
||||||||||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Code:
   _._                                                     _._
 .'   '.                   _    |    _                   .'   '.
 | .    \                 ( '.  |  .' )                 /    . |
  '       \        .          \ ^ /          .        /       '
            \     ' |  .   ---<"O">---   .  | '     /
             '-.__.'  | '     / v \     ' |  '.__.-'
                       '.__.-'  |  '-.__.'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
bhlaab
 
 


Joined: 19 Nov 2008
Posts: 1323


PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 4:03 pm    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

DraQ wrote:
would it be so hard to shift no penetration feedback from interface (icon) to showing that the projectiles bounce harmlessly of target's armour and the target doesn't even flinch?


yeah actually it probably would
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DraQ
 
 


Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 9669


PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 4:55 pm    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

bhlaab wrote:
DraQ wrote:
would it be so hard to shift no penetration feedback from interface (icon) to showing that the projectiles bounce harmlessly of target's armour and the target doesn't even flinch?


yeah actually it probably would
It amounts to playing an animation while spawning "blood splatter" effect if the passing damage rounds to >0, and not playing an animation while spawning "ricochet" effect otherwise, FFS.
_________________
Be vewy vewy quiet, I'm twolling wetawds.
----------------------------------------

Andhaira wrote:
You are a moron who's constant spamming and pointless views do not count.

----------------------------------------
Kaiserin wrote:
I actually kind of agree with the sentiment that primates are prone to bad habits. It's definitely part of what made us successful, but it's still kind of a travesty that the first species to take tool use to these heights had to be part of the great ape family. Life is savage though I guess...

Salute
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Clockwork Knight
 
 


Joined: 06 May 2009
Posts: 10763
Location: Fighting rats inside my anus


PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 6:01 pm    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

I don't think a threshold would be so fucking high a projectile wouldn't make the target even flinch. It'd look weird, even Robocop flinched a little when under heavy fire. We would need a "FUCK that hurt" and a "Ooof...close, but no cigar" animation.

And Beth can't animate for shit, so...
_________________
nomask7 wrote:
If you've ever worked in a kindergarten, you've probably noticed how one child sometimes begins to chant something, such as "all bears are toys, all bears are toys", then other children will join in with him, so that after a while every child in the room is chanting, "all bears are toys, all bears are toys." You might put in, "No they are not. That one in the picture, for example." They would continue, "all bears are toys, all bears are toys."

That really happens, and quite often too. It's also exactly how adults in academia think and behave most of the time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bhlaab
 
 


Joined: 19 Nov 2008
Posts: 1323


PostPosted: Mon May 03, 2010 6:45 pm    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

I think there is a very small minimum amount of damage done anyway even if the shield comes up to kind of avoid the super-invincibility that plagued each Fallout's endgame
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Monkeyfinger
 
 


Joined: 05 Aug 2004
Posts: 71
Location: Pacifica, CA


PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 6:56 am    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

The old fallouts had criticals that ate right through DT. Your power armor could have high enough DT to completely stop a normal shot, but if you got hit in the eyes it was over - you took 150 damage instead of 200 but you were still dead.

I didn't play FO3 so I'm not sure if it was the same way but 1 and 2 had that solution to invincibility armor, for what it's worth.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
GarfunkeL
 
 


Joined: 07 Nov 2008
Posts: 4374


PostPosted: Wed May 12, 2010 7:46 am    Post subject: Report this post / user! Reply with quote

Yeah. What Power Armour did was to remove the "chipping away your HP"-mechanic, since only really bad crits or overwhelming normal damage were dangerous.
_________________
Brave Codexers take on Terror From the Deep
Before it turned into Faggotry, when it was still Fantasy - LP FF6!
Sovard wrote:

I'll have to listen to my Bayreuth 1953 13-CD set of Der Ring Des Nibelungen to recreate the amount of tragedy that has befallen us this day.

Volourn wrote:
I completed Fo with a big hammr. Talk about wackamole - and, in FO's case, that's literal. LMAO
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Codex Forums -> RPG Codex News & Content Comments All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Anti Bot Question MOD - phpBB MOD against Spam Bots
Blocked registrations / posts: 7172 / 0
eXTReMe Tracker