Jason chasing a bee

Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Posts: 8982 Location: baby arm fantasy island
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 10:31 pm Post subject: Putting Holes in Stuff the JE Sawyer Way |
|
|
Obsidian's J.E. Sawyer let it be known that damage threshold is returning to the Fallout series with Fallout: New Vegas.
Imagine that there is an amount of damage that armor directly subtracts from damage... a "threshold" of damage, if you will. While a small percentage of damage may get through even the thickest armor, damage threshold can effectively neutralize a lot of small arms. Fallout 1 and 2 used numerical feedback to let the player know when their weapons weren't doing any damage. In F3 and F:NV, the player only sees enemy health meters that represent a percentage of total health rather than an exact value. This makes it difficult to tell how effective an enemy's armor is (as opposed to the target simply having a ton of health). In F:NV, the red shield appears next to a target's health meter when you hit it for damage that is equal to or less than the target's damage threshold. A HUD-colored shield appears next to the player's health meter when the player is hit for damage equal to or less than the player's damage threshold.
High RoF weapons typically have a low DAM, high DPS. E.g. 10mm SMG. Low RoF weapons are the opposite. E.g. Hunting Rifle. F:NV's Pip-Boy Weapons tab now cross-fades between DAM and DPS so the player can make more tactical choices about what weapon to use in any given circumstance. Having both of these values visible has also allowed us to revise the calculation of DAM/DPS values to be less abstract and more accurate. Using the weapons previously listed, a 10mm SMG would be best against unarmored/lightly armored targets at close range. The Hunting Rifle is ideal against armored targets at long range. But if the player wants to get fiddly with numbers, the Cowboy Repeater (mentioned in the Escapist preview) is better than either weapon against unarmored/lightly armored targets at long range since it is accurate, has a decent DAM and a better DPS than the Hunting Rifle. Add ammo subtypes and mods into the mix and there are a lot of ways to optimize the gear you carry and use.
Thanks to Ausir for pointing this out |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
SerratedBiz


Joined: 04 Mar 2009 Posts: 772 Location: Multiheaded monkeys
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So we introduced this cool mechanic that ensured you would need to use different weapons to approach different challenges, and then we made sure we included a weapon that was powerful enough to invalidate this increase in difficulty.
/codex _________________ Nobody knows what it's like to be a dustbin in Shaftsbury with hooligans. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Awor Szurkrarz


Joined: 11 Dec 2009 Posts: 2909
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wish developers would start to use RL as an inspiration. With weapons having functions and parameters based on RL ones, not on their weird ideas.
After all, all these weapons were developed for a purpose. They wouldn't be produced and sold if there would be one type of a weapon for all situations. _________________ Kszarzahrl
| tunguska wrote: | | Shooting young children in the groin with a high caliber firearm is possible in real life. So why not make it possible in the game? Bethesda/Zenimax makes me sick. Total dickwads who only care about money. I'd like to mod the game to include nuking kindergartens and nursery schools and grammar schools and blowing up school buses with grenades. Little children are a lot of fun to slaughter. I could almost never make it through Fallout without a "child killer" tag. It's just sooo delicious and irresistible to blow them away. I'm one of the few who would actually like to do this in real life as well. But the point of a game is to live out a fantasy that you cannot in real life. Like killing hundreds of people is okay, but a single child? No way! That's sick! Give me a break. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
bhlaab


Joined: 19 Nov 2008 Posts: 1323
|
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SerratedBiz wrote: | So we introduced this cool mechanic that ensured you would need to use different weapons to approach different challenges, and then we made sure we included a weapon that was powerful enough to invalidate this increase in difficulty.
/codex |
Which weapon is that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
treave


Joined: 06 Jul 2008 Posts: 1685
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| bhlaab wrote: | | SerratedBiz wrote: | So we introduced this cool mechanic that ensured you would need to use different weapons to approach different challenges, and then we made sure we included a weapon that was powerful enough to invalidate this increase in difficulty.
/codex |
Which weapon is that? |
| JE Sawyer wrote: | | Using the weapons previously listed, a 10mm SMG would be best against unarmored/lightly armored targets at close range. The Hunting Rifle is ideal against armored targets at long range. But if the player wants to get fiddly with numbers, the Cowboy Repeater (mentioned in the Escapist preview) is better than either weapon against unarmored/lightly armored targets at long range since it is accurate, has a decent DAM and a better DPS than the Hunting Rifle. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Ausir The Vault Overseer

Joined: 21 Oct 2002 Posts: 2202 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Now read with a bit of comprehenshion.
| Quote: | | Using the weapons previously listed, a 10mm SMG would be best against unarmored/lightly armored targets at close range. The Hunting Rifle is ideal against armored targets at long range. But if the player wants to get fiddly with numbers, the Cowboy Repeater (mentioned in the Escapist preview) is better than either weapon against unarmored/lightly armored targets at long range since it is accurate, has a decent DAM and a better DPS than the Hunting Rifle. |
_________________ The Vault - Fallout Wiki * Alpha Protocol Wiki * Fallout: New Vegas * * Star Wars: The Old Republic Wiki |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
treave


Joined: 06 Jul 2008 Posts: 1685
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 2:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I stand corrected. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Norfleet

Joined: 03 Jun 2005 Posts: 1149
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 2:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| There's also the fact that, traditionally in Fallout, the 10mm and the hunting rifle represent bottom of the food chain in their respective weapon classes, so you WOULD expect to find weapons that are better than them in every way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Sovy Kurosei -


Joined: 29 Dec 2004 Posts: 1518
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Fallout 1 and 2 used numerical feedback to let the player know when their weapons weren't doing any damage. In F3 and F:NV, the player only sees enemy health meters that represent a percentage of total health rather than an exact value. This makes it difficult to tell how effective an enemy's armor is (as opposed to the target simply having a ton of health). |
If the enemies have so much health that the player can't tell if the enemy is immune to their bullets or just has swimming pools of hit points then I think they have completely different problem on their hands.
Protip: Nobody likes plugging away ten minutes on a bad guy with a move set that can be figured out in ten seconds. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
SerratedBiz


Joined: 04 Mar 2009 Posts: 772 Location: Multiheaded monkeys
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 4:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ausir wrote: | Now read with a bit of comprehenshion.
| Quote: | | Using the weapons previously listed, a 10mm SMG would be best against unarmored/lightly armored targets at close range. The Hunting Rifle is ideal against armored targets at long range. But if the player wants to get fiddly with numbers, the Cowboy Repeater (mentioned in the Escapist preview) is better than either weapon against unarmored/lightly armored targets at long range since it is accurate, has a decent DAM and a better DPS than the Hunting Rifle. |
|
Point taken. But when you say it's effective against -light- armor (so it does have armor penetration), and at the same time saying "better DPS", I'm not so sure the line is as clear as you make it to be. _________________ Nobody knows what it's like to be a dustbin in Shaftsbury with hooligans. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Clockwork Knight


Joined: 06 May 2009 Posts: 10763 Location: Fighting rats inside my anus
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Better DPS = Higher rate of fire. Doesn't imply it's good against armored targets (I'm assuming "armored" means heavy / medium armor, which is what the Hunting Rifle is good against). The SMG has huge DPS and still is a bad choice against armored targets due to each bullet causing less damage (thus, being resisted by the threshold).
Way I see it, the Cowbow Repeater is better than both against unarmored / light armored targets at long range because the SMG is bad at long range, and while the Hunting Rifle CAN hit targets at long range, the unecessary extra force and the lower rate of fire makes it an obvious bad choice compared to the CR.
Meanwhile, the SMG is better than both at close range if there's no threshold in the way. The distinction is quite clear. _________________
| nomask7 wrote: | If you've ever worked in a kindergarten, you've probably noticed how one child sometimes begins to chant something, such as "all bears are toys, all bears are toys", then other children will join in with him, so that after a while every child in the room is chanting, "all bears are toys, all bears are toys." You might put in, "No they are not. That one in the picture, for example." They would continue, "all bears are toys, all bears are toys."
That really happens, and quite often too. It's also exactly how adults in academia think and behave most of the time. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
DraQ


Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 9669
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Damage threshold is a very good mechanics, a huge incline compared to most of modern faggotry and I'm more than happy to see it back, but the armour systems shouldn't stop there - kinetic projectiles could be given velocity, mass, AP modifiers to account for their shape and construction (currently dumb, handcoded ones), and drag modifiers to account for them losing velocity and possibly tumbling. Other weapons could be parametrized as well, or their shots be made as compound objects, using multiple simple effects to simulate complex ones. I'm thinking of something like Cortex Command, only refined, more complex, 3D, but without the computationally expensive pixel physics.
Red shield icon, on the other hand is rather fail. PnP RPGs are mostly interface and storytelling, with simplistic mechanics and almost no presentation. Computers on the other hand excel at complex, simulative mechanics and stunning presentation - would it be so hard to shift no penetration feedback from interface (icon) to showing that the projectiles bounce harmlessly of target's armour and the target doesn't even flinch? _________________ Be vewy vewy quiet, I'm twolling wetawds.
----------------------------------------
| Andhaira wrote: | | You are a moron who's constant spamming and pointless views do not count. |
----------------------------------------
| Kaiserin wrote: | | I actually kind of agree with the sentiment that primates are prone to bad habits. It's definitely part of what made us successful, but it's still kind of a travesty that the first species to take tool use to these heights had to be part of the great ape family. Life is savage though I guess... |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
1eyedking


Joined: 10 Dec 2007 Posts: 2543 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| DraQ wrote: | | Damage threshold is a very good mechanics, a huge incline compared to most of modern faggotry and I'm more than happy to see it back, but the armour systems shouldn't stop there - kinetic projectiles could be given velocity, mass, AP modifiers to account for their shape and construction (currently dumb, handcoded ones), and drag modifiers to account for them losing velocity and possibly tumbling. Other weapons could be parametrized as well, or their shots be made as compound objects, using multiple simple effects to simulate complex ones. I'm thinking of something like Cortex Command, only refined, more complex, 3D, but without the computationally expensive pixel physics. |
Would be cool but it's bad design all over, sends the KISS principle to shit. _________________ Stuff:
∙ Alpha Popamole Official Guide
∙ Icewind Dale II Random Loot Tables
∙ The Definitive Icewind Dale II Extended XP Table
∙ Arcanum Balanced XP Cap Remover
∙ Why The Witcher is an intelligent game |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
roll-a-die


Joined: 27 Sep 2009 Posts: 1783
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 1eyedking wrote: |
Would be cool but it's bad design all over, sends the KISS principle to shit. |
Not to mention it would be HELL to actually code. And would screw up the encapsulation principle so bad it's not even funny. _________________
| Colbert wrote: | | Belgian's are a dirty thieving people, drink Bud Light. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
DraQ


Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 9669
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 1eyedking wrote: | | Would be cool but it's bad design all over, sends the KISS principle to shit. | So does the KISS prinicple being formulated too confusingly for you to grasp what it is and where it is applicable.
| roll-a-die wrote: | | Not to mention it would be HELL to actually code. | And hilariously easy to code content for later on.
No free lunch, you see.
| Quote: | | And would screw up the encapsulation principle so bad it's not even funny. | How so? _________________ Be vewy vewy quiet, I'm twolling wetawds.
----------------------------------------
| Andhaira wrote: | | You are a moron who's constant spamming and pointless views do not count. |
----------------------------------------
| Kaiserin wrote: | | I actually kind of agree with the sentiment that primates are prone to bad habits. It's definitely part of what made us successful, but it's still kind of a travesty that the first species to take tool use to these heights had to be part of the great ape family. Life is savage though I guess... |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
praetor


Joined: 27 Apr 2009 Posts: 212 Location: Vhoorl
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Clockwork Knight wrote: | | Better DPS = Higher rate of fire. |
no. DPS=/=ROF.
a weapon with 50 points of damage/shot that fires 1 shot every second would have a better DPS but lower ROF than a weapon that fires 20 shots/sec with each dealing 2 points of damage _________________ I vino veritas... in vagina penis. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Luzur


Joined: 12 Feb 2009 Posts: 9228 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cowboy Repeater.
now thats a gay name for a gun. _________________ "Churchill and Roosevelt are sitting over there in their plutocratic little world, behind the scene, the jews run their show. I have my people behind me." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Clockwork Knight


Joined: 06 May 2009 Posts: 10763 Location: Fighting rats inside my anus
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| praetor wrote: | | Clockwork Knight wrote: | | Better DPS = Higher rate of fire. |
no. DPS=/=ROF.
a weapon with 50 points of damage/shot that fires 1 shot every second would have a better DPS but lower ROF than a weapon that fires 20 shots/sec with each dealing 2 points of damage |
Hm, that's right. Brain fart induced by imagining the weapon effects on armored targets. Rest of the post should be right, though. _________________
| nomask7 wrote: | If you've ever worked in a kindergarten, you've probably noticed how one child sometimes begins to chant something, such as "all bears are toys, all bears are toys", then other children will join in with him, so that after a while every child in the room is chanting, "all bears are toys, all bears are toys." You might put in, "No they are not. That one in the picture, for example." They would continue, "all bears are toys, all bears are toys."
That really happens, and quite often too. It's also exactly how adults in academia think and behave most of the time. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
spacemoose


Joined: 22 Jan 2005 Posts: 9200 Location: california
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stay tuned for next weeks episode: "putting stuff in holes the chris avellone way" _________________ ||||||||||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Code: | _._ _._
.' '. _ | _ .' '.
| . \ ( '. | .' ) / . |
' \ . \ ^ / . / '
\ ' | . ---<"O">--- . | ' /
'-.__.' | ' / v \ ' | '.__.-'
'.__.-' | '-.__.' |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
bhlaab


Joined: 19 Nov 2008 Posts: 1323
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DraQ wrote: | | would it be so hard to shift no penetration feedback from interface (icon) to showing that the projectiles bounce harmlessly of target's armour and the target doesn't even flinch? |
yeah actually it probably would |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
DraQ


Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 9669
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bhlaab wrote: | | DraQ wrote: | | would it be so hard to shift no penetration feedback from interface (icon) to showing that the projectiles bounce harmlessly of target's armour and the target doesn't even flinch? |
yeah actually it probably would | It amounts to playing an animation while spawning "blood splatter" effect if the passing damage rounds to >0, and not playing an animation while spawning "ricochet" effect otherwise, FFS. _________________ Be vewy vewy quiet, I'm twolling wetawds.
----------------------------------------
| Andhaira wrote: | | You are a moron who's constant spamming and pointless views do not count. |
----------------------------------------
| Kaiserin wrote: | | I actually kind of agree with the sentiment that primates are prone to bad habits. It's definitely part of what made us successful, but it's still kind of a travesty that the first species to take tool use to these heights had to be part of the great ape family. Life is savage though I guess... |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Clockwork Knight


Joined: 06 May 2009 Posts: 10763 Location: Fighting rats inside my anus
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think a threshold would be so fucking high a projectile wouldn't make the target even flinch. It'd look weird, even Robocop flinched a little when under heavy fire. We would need a "FUCK that hurt" and a "Ooof...close, but no cigar" animation.
And Beth can't animate for shit, so... _________________
| nomask7 wrote: | If you've ever worked in a kindergarten, you've probably noticed how one child sometimes begins to chant something, such as "all bears are toys, all bears are toys", then other children will join in with him, so that after a while every child in the room is chanting, "all bears are toys, all bears are toys." You might put in, "No they are not. That one in the picture, for example." They would continue, "all bears are toys, all bears are toys."
That really happens, and quite often too. It's also exactly how adults in academia think and behave most of the time. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
bhlaab


Joined: 19 Nov 2008 Posts: 1323
|
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think there is a very small minimum amount of damage done anyway even if the shield comes up to kind of avoid the super-invincibility that plagued each Fallout's endgame |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Monkeyfinger

Joined: 05 Aug 2004 Posts: 71 Location: Pacifica, CA
|
Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 6:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
The old fallouts had criticals that ate right through DT. Your power armor could have high enough DT to completely stop a normal shot, but if you got hit in the eyes it was over - you took 150 damage instead of 200 but you were still dead.
I didn't play FO3 so I'm not sure if it was the same way but 1 and 2 had that solution to invincibility armor, for what it's worth. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
GarfunkeL


Joined: 07 Nov 2008 Posts: 4374
|
Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 7:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah. What Power Armour did was to remove the "chipping away your HP"-mechanic, since only really bad crits or overwhelming normal damage were dangerous. _________________ Brave Codexers take on Terror From the Deep
Before it turned into Faggotry, when it was still Fantasy - LP FF6!
| Sovard wrote: |
I'll have to listen to my Bayreuth 1953 13-CD set of Der Ring Des Nibelungen to recreate the amount of tragedy that has befallen us this day. |
| Volourn wrote: | | I completed Fo with a big hammr. Talk about wackamole - and, in FO's case, that's literal. LMAO |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|