Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Interview Tim Cain spills the beans at Edge Online

DarkUnderlord

Professional Throne Sitter
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2002
Messages
28,344
Tags: Tim Cain

<a href="http://www.edge-online.com/features/whats-tim-cain-up-to">What's Tim Cain Up To? Edge Online asked him</a>:
<br>
<blockquote><b>You’ve released some hardcore PC games in the past. But today, how concerned are you with accessibility and mass market appeal with this unannounced Carbine game that you're working on?</b>
<br>
<br>
TC: We’re very concerned in making it available to the mass market and trying to design a game that would appeal to casual and hardcore players alike. I think the MMO space is big enough that you can design a game that appeals to both of those groups.
<br>
<br>
<b>What are your impressions of what you’ve seen of Fallout 3? Do you think that they’re doing that franchise justice?</b>
<br>
<br>
TC: I do like what I’ve seen about Fallout 3. I’ve talked to those guys at Bethesda about it and they know that it’s their IP now and they’ve gone in a certain direction that I find very intriguing. It’s not necessarily the direction I would have gone, but I can tell you I have my Fallout 3 pre-ordered. I want my life-sized Pip-Boy and I’m going to be all ready to play that at the end of the month.</blockquote>
<br>
Appealing to two types of people is bad Timmy! Decisions like that lead to real-time and turn-based being used in Arcanum and the sucky combat system that resulted. You should be choosing your audience and targeting their nuts off.
<br>
<br>
Timmy is currently playing Dungeons & Dragons Online and has an active WoW account.
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,924
Another Codexian hero has fallen.

Sad too, as I enjoyed most of his games even if the hero worship he drew was patheticly over the top.
 

thesheeep

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 16, 2007
Messages
9,939
Location
Tampere, Finland
Codex 2012 Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming! Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Torment: Tides of Numenera Codex USB, 2014 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Bubbles In Memoria A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
There is nothing wrong in trying to please both mass and hardcore market.
It's just incredibly hard to manage and I haven't seen any game succeeding in that.

But that doesn't mean it is impossible.

Better a game that tries to aim at the hardcore market than one that completely ignores it...
 

MetalCraze

Arcane
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
21,104
Location
Urkanistan
Man, we are talking about MMO here. It appeals only to hardcore grinders that will spend months of their miserable lifes killing a bunch of pixels.
 

Texas Red

Whiner
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
7,044
What's the point of interviewing a big shot developer if you know their answers will be generic PR?
 

elander_

Arbiter
Joined
Oct 7, 2005
Messages
2,015
"Appealing to two types of people is bad Timmy! Decisions like that lead to real-time and turn-based being used in Arcanum and the sucky combat system that resulted. You should be choosing your audience and targeting their nuts off. "

The problem with Arcanum is the same as Fallout and the reason people see TB in these games as boring. Both these games don't let you control your party members and this is 90% of what makes TB games cool, that is, being able to create combined tactics between your companions, which is hard to impossible in other games.

In Arcanum your companies are most of the time out of control and you spend your time making sure they don't throw themselves into a trap or run to the middle of an enemy party and get slaughtered instead of having fun with TB placing them in the best tactical positions.
 

Major_Blackhart

Codexia Lord Sodom
Patron
Joined
Dec 5, 2002
Messages
18,303
Location
Jersey for now
I still like the guy. Yeah, MMO's generally are a waste of time, but still, if he can do it differently, then what the hell.

I'd be interested to find out what kind of genre he's using for the MMO he's working on. Fantasy, Post Apoc, Cyberpunk, Steampunk, what.
 

Drakron

Arcane
Joined
May 19, 2005
Messages
6,326
Major_Blackhart said:
I still like the guy. Yeah, MMO's generally are a waste of time, but still, if he can do it differently, then what the hell.

The problem is in the end MMO's HAVE to be a waste of time because they survive on subscriptions and its impossible to add content at the same speed as of the players going over said content.

That is why there is the time sinks of the grind and why it making the game moving towards the social network were people pay to just log in to hang out with their online friends pays off in the end.

WoW that is the "casual" MMO still requires about 2 months of play to see the end content and developing of a social network in order to reach several of that content.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2008
Messages
453
Location
Heck
Dark Individual said:
What's the point of interviewing a big shot developer if you know their answers will be generic PR?

Politics. So and so has gone on the record with his endorsement of so and so, blah blah.

thesheeep said:
There is nothing wrong in trying to please both mass and hardcore market.
It's just incredibly hard to manage and I haven't seen any game succeeding in that.

But that doesn't mean it is impossible.

Better a game that tries to aim at the hardcore market than one that completely ignores it...

Yeah Blizzard manages to do it.
 

MetalCraze

Arcane
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
21,104
Location
Urkanistan
Except they don't. They are just good at making fun multiplayers that are nowhere near complex. Note how boring blizzard's singleplayers are
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2008
Messages
453
Location
Heck
skyway said:
Except they don't. They are just good at making fun multiplayers that are nowhere near complex. Note how boring blizzard's singleplayers are

They are masters of polish and refinement and accessibility. True, how "complex" the mechanics in their games are is arguable and their single-player games are usually training modes for multi-players with throwaway stories.

You can take something like Diablo II which any idiot can pretty much pick up and play and contrast that casual player base with the number cruncher min/maxers who count the frames, calculate and optimize FCR breakpoints for their characters, etc. Regular Starcraft players vs. gosu e-sports pros. The playerbase for WoW for whom it's nothing but a graphical chat program vs the competitive PvP dewds or that guy who has 30 computers set up in his room to play WoW. They've somehow captured the interest of the casual and "hardcore" audience.

This is a tired example, but I've always considered MMO's nerdy, niche, and "hardcore." Not only do you have to invest a monthly fee, you have the treadmill time investment, yet Blizzard has turned WoW into a pop culture/mainstream staple that's featured on South Park and has non-gamers talking about raiding around their water coolers.
 

Hazelnut

Erudite
Joined
Dec 17, 2002
Messages
1,490
Location
UK
So noone else thinks he might be playing the political game here then, saying the right things at the right time to the right people. Then doing good stuff behind the scenes. Just a thought.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2008
Messages
453
Location
Heck
The days of developers sniping each other in their .plans are gone. The glorious rockstar developer, "Going to make you his bitch!" days.

That Dead or Alive guy who calls other games pieces of shit eventually got fired didn't he (for sexual harassment)?

And if Kojima is mis-quoted about calling the PS3 shite so much trouble goes into setting the record straight. Don't want to hurt feelings (i.e. business avenues).


So now we're stuck with friendly corporate style ribbing with veiled subtexts (Bethesda saying they wish Blizzard would just innovate more). We'll let the Penny Arcades do our talking for us. Progress.
 

Ausir

Arcane
Joined
Oct 21, 2002
Messages
2,388
Location
Poland
skyway said:
Except they don't. They are just good at making fun multiplayers that are nowhere near complex. Note how boring blizzard's singleplayers are

I like StarCraft's single player campaign.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom