Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Interview Spector is Pro-Choice

Saint_Proverbius

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
11,476
Location
Behind you.
Tags: Warren Spector

<a href="http://www.eurogamer.net/">EuroGamer</a> has <a href="http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=65751">an interview</a> with <b>Warren Spector</b>. You may remember him as that guy who worked on a bunch of cultish successful games. Anyway, some guy from <a href="http://www.valvesoftware.com/">Valve Software</a> said something about how he was wrong about having six choices in games because players will only see one-sixth of the game or something. Here's part of the reply:
<br>
<blockquote>So, to try to wrap this up in something less than book length, I don't believe it's ever a waste of time to give players real choices, rather than fake ones. If all you're doing is putting players on rails and rocketing them through your story, why not just build a roller coaster or make a movie? If the only choice a player gets to make is which weapon to use to kill a bad guy, you've completely wasted that player's time. Roller coaster rides are immense amounts of fun, but really, all they do is provide an adrenalin rush and a moment's distraction from the workaday world. Games can be more. Movies are terrific storytelling devices - I love movies - but movies already exist. I don't need to make them. (Well, I kinda want to produce a movie someday, but that's another matter entirely...) If all you're doing is telling yourstory to players (with the added attraction of getting to pick a gun once in a while), why bother?</blockquote>
<br>
Wasn't he the guy who said, few years back, there's no point in making games with multiple paths because a player will only play a game once anyway? Or am I having a stroke? <i>Changing one's mind is a custom us Canadians hold dear, sir!</i>
<br>
<br>
Thanks, <b>Ghan</b>!
<br>
<br>
 

roguefrog

Liturgist
Joined
Aug 6, 2003
Messages
545
Location
Tokyo, Japan
Well there was that "tyranny of choice" comment he made a while back, but Deus Ex does illustrate that he was down with it.
 

POOPERSCOOPER

Prophet
Joined
Mar 6, 2003
Messages
2,724
Location
California
I haven't played many of the guys games but wasn't dues ex2 have no real choices compared to the first one?


That guy may be the next RexExitium legendary flip floper of the east.
 

doctor_kaz

Scholar
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
517
Location
Ohio, USA
I won't listen to anything that Warren Spector says until we get a heartfelt apology for Deus Ex: Invisible War.
 

GhanBuriGhan

Erudite
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
1,170
doctor_kaz said:
I won't listen to anything that Warren Spector says until we get a heartfelt apology for Deus Ex: Invisible War.

He talks about it in part 2 of the interview.

http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?ar ... 769&page=1


Warren Spector: I know some folks thought Invisible War and Deadly Shadows were "dumbed down for console". And, yes, we did make a conscious attempt to reach out to a larger audience. (Increasing development costs'll do that to you!) However, both teams still set some mighty lofty goals - goals that had nothing to do with making the games accessible to a larger audience. I'm willing to acknowledge that both games fell short of their goals if some of the critics will acknowledge how many risks the teams took and how hard the challenges were that they tried to tackle.

But to answer your question, I don't think it's in any way - any way - necessary to dumb a game down for console or to reach a huge audience.

You just need to execute exceptionally well on a clear, compelling concept.

Gamers aren't stupid and they're not kids (not most of 'em, anyway). You can make serious, adult entertainment, release it on a console and succeed.
 

Drakron

Arcane
Joined
May 19, 2005
Messages
6,326
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/27/britney_sculpture/">Birthing</a> <a href="http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/7758/t67ybr7vm.jpg">Spector?</a>
 

Cimmerian Nights

Liturgist
Joined
Aug 20, 2004
Messages
428
Location
The Roche Motel
But to answer your question, I don't think it's in any way - any way - necessary to dumb a game down for console or to reach a huge audience.

You just need to execute exceptionally well on a clear, compelling concept.

Gamers aren't stupid and they're not kids (not most of 'em, anyway). You can make serious, adult entertainment, release it on a console and succeed.

Jesus, Warren, you`ll never get that job at Bethesda with this kind of talk.
 

Psilon

Erudite
Joined
Feb 15, 2003
Messages
2,018
Location
Codex retirement
Given that the original Deus Ex required 64MB, actually needed 128+MB, and had a hard disk available for paging, I fail to see how a more graphically intensive sequel with larger textures, higher-poly models, no virtual memory, and an overabundance of shaders could fit into 64MB of XBox RAM without serious design compromises. Ya cannae break the laws o' physics, captain.
 

Voss

Erudite
Joined
Jun 25, 2003
Messages
1,770
roguefrog said:
Well there was that "tyranny of choice" comment he made a while back, but Deus Ex does illustrate that he was down with it.

That he was against that whole tyrrany of choice? yes, it does. Play it a bit, around the decision points and you'll find that
1- you still get railroaded.
2- it doesn't actually change much if you manage to be quick enough to force a 'choice' down the systems throat. Killing the cyber-bitch in the plane doesn't throw you down another path (rather than nuking her with a password a bit later). Nor does saving your brother in his apartment. Or killing the first boss. Or...
3- The thing I most remember from that game is that I really wanted to be loyal to the organization. The vague bullshit people were hinting at (early on) wasn't enough to make me turn on the unit. But, hey, I had to anyway.

I still want to smack people who think adding a weak skill system makes the game an rpg, too.
 

Dragon

Augur
Joined
Aug 1, 2003
Messages
101
Location
Toulouse, France
Whatever the critics, the first DX is still one of the best mix of FPS and RPG you can get (along with System Shock 2 and Bloodlines).
 

GhanBuriGhan

Erudite
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
1,170
Major_Blackhart said:
Yeah, but other than those games, how many types of that genre were released?

Waht kind of argument is that? How many Fallout like games have there been?
 

mathboy

Liturgist
Joined
Feb 21, 2004
Messages
666
GhanBuriGhan said:
Major_Blackhart said:
Yeah, but other than those games, how many types of that genre were released?

Waht kind of argument is that? How many Fallout like games have there been?
While Fallout is one the best CRPGs, I'm sure Lionheart was one of the best SPECIAL using medieval realtime CRPGS, just like Deus Ex is one of the best pseudo-RPG FPSs with stats.
 

LlamaGod

Cipher
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
3,095
Location
Yes
Bloodlines does what Deus Ex tried to do way fucking better than DE.

Deus Ex was a standard FPS but with a few 'pick' points that all lead the same spot ala arcade shooting games. They made all standard actions of a FPS - Finding keycards/Locked Doors, Shooting, Movement in area - shitted them out and attached 'skills' to them, where you spend points thrown at you as you play to bring them to normalcy.

There wasn't a slightlest hint of RPG in there, even in the loosest sense.
 

TheGreatGodPan

Arbiter
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
1,762
It's true that DX was rather linear due its mission-based rather than open-world nature and I'm still ticked that I couldn't stick with UNATCO or sell out to Bob Page, but it's one of the few games were they acted as if your choices really mattered because the people were supposed to be people rather than NPCs in the background to your quest for the Thingamajig of Power. When you kill people unnecessarily your pacifist brother gets ticked at you, and if you cut and run it's like his blood is on your hands, even if he doesn't do much afterward. The ending is more than just choose-which-faction-to-side-with, it's how you would change the world if you had the option. There's little gameplay significance in whether Manderley yells at you for going into the women's restroom or if Gunther takes it personally that you killed Anna (although it seems impossible, if you avoid doing it his dialogue is different), but it still made the world feel more reactive and the choices meaningful.
 

Hazelnut

Erudite
Joined
Dec 17, 2002
Messages
1,490
Location
UK
LlamaGod said:
Bloodlines does what Deus Ex tried to do way fucking better than DE.

Deus Ex was a standard FPS but with a few 'pick' points that all lead the same spot ala arcade shooting games. They made all standard actions of a FPS - Finding keycards/Locked Doors, Shooting, Movement in area - shitted them out and attached 'skills' to them, where you spend points thrown at you as you play to bring them to normalcy.

There wasn't a slightlest hint of RPG in there, even in the loosest sense.

Complete rubbish. (IMHO)

I will agree that the overarching story and plot were linear - with limited scope for choices. However, if you care to look on a smaller scale, at the 'problems' posed within the levels (it was built on an FPS engine which limited it somewhat), then you'll see that there was choice. There was not a single solution to the problem, there was just the problem, the environment and your skills/enhancements. You choose your route or 'solution', and as Warren mentioned in one of the interviews, a lot of fun could be derived from comparing your approach with those taken by others. Some levels were better at delivering this than others, personally I think that the very first level/mission was one of the best. You can't simply dismiss all this as the same as standard, if very good, shooters like the Half-Lives. (and they're more story driven than most FPS fare)

To dismiss Deus Ex as not having a slightlest hint of RPG is ridiculous hyperbole.

I'm somewhat surprised at the lack of positive reaction to what Warren is saying. I'd have thought that many codexers would appreciate the things he's saying as the right direction for games, or at the very least far better than the current trends. He may not be about to develop the pinnacle of RPG goodness, but I have a lot of time for what he says. He champions the kind of things that I like to see in games and talks a hell of a lot more sense than most in the industry.
 

Jasede

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
24,793
Insert Title Here RPG Wokedex Codex Year of the Donut I'm very into cock and ball torture
LlamaGod said:
Bloodlines does what Deus Ex tried to do way fucking better than DE.

Deus Ex was a standard FPS but with a few 'pick' points that all lead the same spot ala arcade shooting games. They made all standard actions of a FPS - Finding keycards/Locked Doors, Shooting, Movement in area - shitted them out and attached 'skills' to them, where you spend points thrown at you as you play to bring them to normalcy.

There wasn't a slightest hint of RPG in there, even in the loosest sense.

I have a question, LlamaGod. What would you call System Shock 1 and 2, having stated this? Are they 3D RPGs, or action-RPGs or are they neither? I am sure that calling 2 or even the very nonlinear 1 just a mindless shooter, an FPS would cheapen those grand games quite a bit. So, if compared to Deus Ex, as what kind of genre do they classify?

Personally, I like to use a nintendoneologism when talking about them: 'First Person Adventure', which is how Nintendo described Metroid Prime. In retrospect, SS1 and 2 did feel like embarking on a difficult, long adventure, methinks.
 

LlamaGod

Cipher
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
3,095
Location
Yes
First Person Adventure fits the System Shock games much better than RPG, especially the first.
 

galsiah

Erudite
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
1,613
Location
Montreal
I liked DX a lot, but it never occurred to me to think of it as an RPG. It makes no mention of role playing, or even "RPG elements" on the box (the box I've got anyway, I'm not sure about the original packaging). Clearly there's a lot missing if it's evaluated as an RPG, but why would anyone do that?

TheGreatGodPan said:
When you kill people unnecessarily your pacifist brother gets ticked at you, and if you cut and run it's like his blood is on your hands, even if he doesn't do much afterward.
I don't think you can really count both of these as advantages:
The pacifist thing has pretty much zero consequences after the first mission. On my first playthrough it seemed important for quite a while. It really isn't though - no-one cares after the start of the game whether you systematically kill every enemy, or sneak past. I felt quite let down by this - you're told "This matters", and the rest of the game shows you that it doesn't (in game world terms). Even Paul doesn't care later. [In fact, it's arguable that Paul isn't a pacifist in the first place: he's already working for the NSF before you go after them. The pacifist line might just be an effort to support his friends without blowing his cover.]

Paul's death/survival is pretty much the opposite - many players won't realize that things could have gone differently on the first playthrough. Personally, I left Paul because I thought that's what the game intended me to do - I wasn't sure that he was going to die, and I wasn't sure that my staying would have saved him.

There's little gameplay significance in whether Manderley yells at you for going into the women's restroom or if Gunther takes it personally that you killed Anna (although it seems impossible, if you avoid doing it his dialogue is different), but it still made the world feel more reactive and the choices meaningful.
That's true, but the women's toilets thing seems a little contrived. It's interesting when it happens, but I couldn't help thinking that pretty much everyone would have investigated every room that early in the game. It didn't really feel to me that the world was responding to how I was playing, so much as covering a very obvious option.

It's also a little vexing that much of the reactivity occurs early in the game. This raised my expectations for later, but the rest of the game doesn't react so much (to indirect situations in any case). Though I was pleased when Manderley refered to what had happened in the bar - I'd inadvertantly triggered a gunfight. That felt a bit more unique to my actions.

The second time through I executed the NSF prisoner in front of the guy in black before he got a chance to speak. (the NSF guy clearly couldn't be allowed to leak information). That got a rather pleasing reaction from the investigator.

I'd agree that DX did well to create the illusion that NPCs were people who cared about your actions.
It didn't really have any large scale consequences though. Even situations where the plot should have branched it didn't. For instance, it is possible (with strength upgrades and various grenades etc.) to escape the area in New York without being captured by Gunther. You can avoid / kill the guards, and walk around to the helicopter - there's just no way to speak to the guy or get in.
 

Voss

Erudite
Joined
Jun 25, 2003
Messages
1,770
Hazelnut said:
Complete rubbish. (IMHO)

Or not. As you go on to say...

I will agree that the overarching story and plot were linear - with limited scope for choices.

Huh. Now, on to the bullshit!

However, if you care to look on a smaller scale, at the 'problems' posed within the levels (it was built on an FPS engine which limited it somewhat), then you'll see that there was choice. There was not a single solution to the problem, there was just the problem, the environment and your skills/enhancements. You choose your route or 'solution', and as Warren mentioned in one of the interviews, a lot of fun could be derived from comparing your approach with those taken by others.

Ooo.. OO.. OmiGOD! Billie! The way you jumped up on that one barrel, instead of like, just shooting the guy was just SOOOO amazing. It gets me sooo fucking hot. :roll:

Shut the fuck up. This isn't role-playing. This is basic tactics with a very limited set of choices.

You can't simply dismiss all this as the same as standard, if very good, shooters like the Half-Lives. (and they're more story driven than most FPS fare)

To dismiss Deus Ex as not having a slightlest hint of RPG is ridiculous hyperbole.

Oh, but I can. And no, it isn't. There are things I look for in an RPG, and DX had none of them. Zip. Zero. A weak-ass skill system and an approach to level building that allows for limited tactics doesn't qualify.

I'm somewhat surprised at the lack of positive reaction to what Warren is saying. I'd have thought that many codexers would appreciate the things he's saying as the right direction for games, or at the very least far better than the current trends. He may not be about to develop the pinnacle of RPG goodness, but I have a lot of time for what he says. He champions the kind of things that I like to see in games and talks a hell of a lot more sense than most in the industry.

Yeah, that would be nice and all, except he has never delievered. And the fact that its a complete 180 from the shit he was spouting a few years back makes it extra suspicious. Plus he has some guy looking over his shoulder saying, no, choices are a mistake. Yeah, good sign.
 

Dragon

Augur
Joined
Aug 1, 2003
Messages
101
Location
Toulouse, France
Voss said:
Complete rubbish. Shut the fuck up. This isn't role-playing.
Ab-so-lu-tly ! Take "running "for exemple, what is running ? Running is going 42 km (and 300 m !) by foot in less than two hours. Everything else is NOT running, just moving you ass rather than staying in the couch. End of argument.
When are some of you going to desacralize the term "RPG" ? It's just broader than your narrow mind, that's all.
(beeing a little pissed because I'm a DX fanboy of course)
 

The_Pope

Scholar
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
844
Deus Ex is way too cool to be an RPG, given that RPG means mindless level grind with the exceptions of Fallout and PST. They aren't the norm. They're so different from RPGs that they probably deserve their own genre name.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom