Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Interview Interview with David Gaider

Vault Dweller

Commissar, Red Star Studio
Developer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Messages
28,024
Tags: BioWare; David Gaider

David Gaider of <a href=http://www.bioware.com>Bioware</a> fame was kind enough to drop everything and <a href=http://www.rpgcodex.com/content.php?id=123>answer a few questions</a> about ... well, a lot of things, so you better see for yourself.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote><i>4. All Bioware role-playing games, for one reason or another, were class-based. I'm sure that was an insightful experience. Did that affect your understanding of classes in a CRPG? Did that give you any ideas we might see in future games? Development and power level of a class, the number and balance of classes, unique abilities, different builds within a class, etc?</i>
<br>
<br>
I think that experience taught us what our fans like to see in their classes, and as well what pitfalls we should be trying to avoid when designing our own class-based system. Overall, I’d say I lean towards having less breadth and more depth when it comes to classes – I’d rather see less actual classes, for instance, and focus more on having many different development options within those classes. That’s simply a personal preference, however. D&D didn’t do too bad of a job of identifying fantasy archetypes that are fun roles to have inside of a party, though I (and any D&D fan, I expect) could probably argue endlessly on the particular merits of any given class and how many options or lack thereof was given by the D&D system to take a class in different directions.</blockquote>
<br>
Thanks to <b>David Gaider</b> and <b>Erik Einsiedel</b> for their time and efforts. Sadly, Dave didn't have time to answer all the questions, but we love him anyway.
<br>
<br>
<br>
 

obediah

Erudite
Joined
Jan 31, 2005
Messages
5,051
Thanks to everyone involved - for an interesting, informative and relatively insult and hype free interview.

Thanks especially to David for going in to the reasons behind some design decisions rather than just shooting buzzwords at us until our heads explode.

I would say that low vs. high magic is more than an aesthetic difference though - especially in a well-fleshed out and deep setting.
 

Surlent

Liturgist
Joined
Jul 21, 2004
Messages
825
Haven't seen codex made interviews for long time. Anyways, great show and Dave rocks.
 

tilting_msh

Formerly Judas
Patron
Joined
May 24, 2004
Messages
102
Codex 2012
Good stuff, I really enjoyed the read. Too bad he couldn't answer the question about the Shadow Thieves/vampire split in BG2, I was curious about what he had to say about that.
 

HanoverF

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Nov 23, 2002
Messages
6,083
MCA Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Codex USB, 2014 Divinity: Original Sin 2
Whats with the ' - ' responses? They're in the vacinity of loaded questions, but a good honest answer would be better than ignoring them for time concerns.
 

Jora

Arcane
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Messages
1,115
Location
Finland
HanoverF said:
Whats with the ' - ' responses? They're in the vacinity of loaded questions, but a good honest answer would be better than ignoring them for time concerns.
VD said:
Sadly, Dave didn't have time to answer all the questions, but we love him anyway
 

GhanBuriGhan

Erudite
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
1,170
The nonlinearity bit is an interesting continuation of the discussion we had a while back on this topic (the "nonlinearity is a waste of time" thread)- it's obvious that designers (or at least David) do in fact see that as a problem. I more and more get the feeling that we will only start to see decent nonlinear games in the mainstream once game engines are sufficiently complex simulators that can take care of some of the cause and effect by themselves, thus taking some of the load of designers shoulders.
 

Vault Dweller

Commissar, Red Star Studio
Developer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Messages
28,024
@ HanoverF: They are not really loaded questions. Each missed question is basically a question about a certain feature. There were some reasons why these features were considered, and I thought that Dave might want to share those reasons with us.
 

Elwro

Arcane
Joined
Dec 29, 2002
Messages
11,746
Location
Krakow, Poland
Divinity: Original Sin Wasteland 2
Good read. I hope he finds time to answer the other questions (yeah, probably impossible) as they're interesting.

Now, Bethesda folks, when are you going to give an interview to RPGCodex? You should see now that it doesn't hurt so bad. :D
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,924
Why does VD have to lie in the questions? That's pretty stupid. Other than the lies, it was a very good interview. :D

Too bad Monsieur Gaider didn't answer all the questions. Maybe next time. :cool:
 

Vault Dweller

Commissar, Red Star Studio
Developer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Messages
28,024
Thanks, guys. Hopefully something will work out with Bethesda, and while I'm waiting for Pete to do the smart thing, I will try to score some more interviews for your amusement.
 

Milecolt

Novice
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
22
Good questions. I really wanted to know the answer for question 7 (about NPC's).
 

HardCode

Erudite
Joined
Aug 23, 2005
Messages
1,138
Excellent interview. No fluff, no BS, just great questions and great answers. Game site interviewers take heed! This is how it's done.
 

Jon

Scholar
Joined
Jan 7, 2006
Messages
105
Great stuff. I guess I will just reiterate what others have said: Its good to read an interview with intelligent questions, focusing on concepts and ideas rather than an unmitigated stream of hype. Thanks to all concerned.
 

Volourn

Pretty Princess
Pretty Princess Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
24,924
"Game site interviewers take heed! This is how it's done."

Yeah. Lie, lie, lie. Let's misinform readers even more. :roll:
 

gromit

Arcane
Joined
Jan 31, 2005
Messages
2,771
Location
Gentrification Station
Yeah, pretty good interview. Sadly, the hyphened questions were really, really good ones. I'm always terribly interested in hearing the developer's side of the [effort:extra content] balance, how they reach the middle ground and why they thought that middleground was optimal. It's one thing to have the facts of the real world reiterated at you, but another to hear the reasoning behind their choices and sacrifices, and which critical elements they tried hardest to keep / reflect.
 

Zomg

Arbiter
Joined
Oct 21, 2005
Messages
6,984
Gaider = Stud

I think the bit where you print the questions he didn't answer was a bit cheesy, since it gives the appearance of evasion, but the "not enough time" thing classes it up somewhat. It does keep more of the balance of power in the domain of the interviewer, though.
 

Mefi

Prophet
Patron
Joined
Apr 7, 2005
Messages
1,364
Location
waiting for a train at Perdido Street Station
Just a little thought on the questions weren't answered..

I'm sure David Gaider did have time constraints. And I take VD's word that his questions weren't meant to be loaded... but.. I've got to confess that the first time I read them, they did appear to be asking for a developer to either dump on another game or confess to something like wasting time over a feature. Perhaps a little more neutrality in the wording might encourage a future developer to confess that he thought Dungeon Lords was a pile of shit on release from his own initiative?


Anyways, just been thinking about the issue of dialogue and narrative. Gaider gave an interesting response regarding that. Can better graphics replace the narrative effect of older games? Or does the reliance on graphics lead developers into becoming sloppy with their dialogue or even neglect it to a much greater degree?
 

FrancoTAU

Cipher
Joined
Oct 21, 2005
Messages
2,507
Location
Brooklyn, NY
I guess a good analogy for that would be like writing dialogue for a movie instead of a book. The graphics would have to still be even better than they are now before they emote exactly like a good actor could though.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom