Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Why are you guys so negative?!!!

Lhynn

Arcane
Joined
Aug 28, 2013
Messages
9,852
WL2 would have been great if it had some quality content before the end of the game.
 

Baron Dupek

Arcane
Joined
Jul 23, 2013
Messages
1,870,825
Cynicism is healthy.

WL2 would have been great if it had some "quality" before it even start. Can't say how the end because it's boreen
 
Last edited:

Roqua

Prospernaut
Dumbfuck Repressed Homosexual In My Safe Space
Joined
Apr 28, 2004
Messages
4,130
Location
YES!
I can't follow you with WL2. I think the DC made that an instant top 10 crpg of all time. Absolutely awesome game that would have been perfectly balanced

Like I said. You are a faggot in denial. :smug:

Am I a homosexual whom is in denial of WL2 really being a bad game? Or is WL2 a top 10 crpg of all time and I just so happen to be a homosexual in denial of my homosexual bum lust?
 
Unwanted

Jaklon

Unwanted
Shitposter
Joined
Mar 10, 2016
Messages
317
I'm hatred. But am I really hatred? No.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom