Game News Tortured Hearts goes Kickstarter for $300k

Pledged. Because...dunno lol.

ah yes, the light hearted, fourth wall breaking, humorous yet epic indie storyline

the ambitious floor-spanning whoopie cushion of videogame narratives

I wish them well, but I think caution is needed. Tim Schafer and Brian Fargo are industry veterans who know how to bring projects to term. Likewise, the MCA-backed Obsidian kickstarter will likely do well. But a modding team like this? How do we know it won't just be vaporware?

With the Codex being prestigious as fuck and all that, and developers joining left and right, here's the Tortured Hearts GRPG thread (with developer answering questions and comments): www.rpgcodex.net/forums/index.php?posts/2024513/

Oh ok I read the first sentence, kinda regret giving them money now. Oh well, gotta have them in-game goodies

I think 300k is a little bit too ambitious with the current kickstarter page. They are updating it though.

While fr from the established name of these two, the team here have a few commercial games under their belt, as well as the original Newcomer to the C64 and the Tortured Hearts NWN game.

Yep, another indie game with horrible humor from people who think they're so witty.

Pass, and no way they can make a whole game with a graphical quality as consistent as in the demo

300k, way to aim low.

I really hope that none of these obvious money-grubbing attempts are successful.

Optimistic.

From the updates it seems like they have no devolpment skills and just want money to pay someone else to make their game.

I'd rather fund this:

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/135802053/mermaid-adventures-an-rpg-of-undersea-fun?ref=card

pfft. Not groundbreaking or ethical enough.

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/mmitchum/zeal-disputatum?ref=category

Imagine plugging in this innovative conflict resolution system into GD.

What the hell is wrong with that girl?

"The micropayment system allows players to pay as little as a small amount... occasionally, to large amounts on a regular basis."

...really.

Thing is they can't change it either, and if it's not reached they won't get a dime.

FTL had a 10.000 goal and are soon ending their kickstarter run. 200% pledged in a day and soon closing in on 164k total. And that's with publicity like Notch tweeting, kotaku articles and shit like that. Also there seems to be this last hour rush of pledgers easily giving a project +10%. They are guaranteed the money they wanted + a fuckton more. With different tiers, maybe they could have gotten even more, who knows.

Let's do sloppy math.
Average pledge for Wasteland 2: 50 bucks.
Average pledge for double fine adventure: 38 doolars.
Average pledge for The Banner Saga: 36 oreos.
Average pledge for FTL: 20 kwacrowns.

Considering this is money going straight into the devs hands, those are nice price tags. I doubt costs for t-shirts, shipping and shit makes a bigger cut than a publisher cut would. I think especially the banner saga is making a big win from this.

Tortured Hearts would probably land at the same level as FTL (at most), because of how cheap their "get game digitally" pledge tier is: 10 doolars. This means they would have to out-do FTL in the amount of pledgers by a fair amount. Like 15k pledgers, minimum. Probably like 18k.
I doubt they will reach that. I don't see viral internet people like Notch waving their dicks at this. Maybe if the game was 15 kwacrowns and the other tiers were more lucrative and fun instead of in-game boost items, they could have had a reasonable chance.

Instead, chances are they won't get a single dingle. Unless 300k was a magic "let's do it!" goal, then I think it was a big mistake aiming that high. If the project was a-go regardless of any extra money from kickstarter, then why not have it be like 20k, max, and let what money you can make help development? Are they set on making the game fully voiced by the cast of Friends or something? What could be so fucking expensive?

It is possible to add to pledge rewards and update (even remake) your kickstarter page. So it's not entirely hopeless. But they've kind of set it up for failure.
If the game does indeed go turn-based and showcases some interesting gameplay, it would be a fucking shame too.

Shit, forgot about Banner Saga, thanks for the tip

Zed

Their update #1 explains this:

In other news, fuggetabootit.

Oh we're made the writing and scripting, we just need other people to craft everything else including all the high-res assets. Don't worry, our plan is realistic and foolproof; it's totally doable.

Pie in the sky projects like this are the beginning of the end, at least for any project without a big name attached to it.

add http://www.kickstarter.com/projects...s-consulting-detective-adventure-mys?ref=card together with the list I wrote and you have my pledge list.
I feel like I'm the Multi-headed Cow of Kickstarter.

First, it really isn't up to Kickstarter to do this kind of screening. Nor should it be. It is up to fans and people enthused by the projects to get a gathering and fund it. Speaking of which, I really think people should try to show some support to the devs, at least if you liked Newcomer or Tortured Hearts. I agree that the target they are aiming at seems improbable, but by pledging and supporting the devs, it might help them gauge a more reasonable goal for the next time.

Making modules for Neverwinter Nights does not turn their maker into someone with any competence for developing a full game with its own engine and game mechanics.

Cassidy

Yeah, but they worked in plenty of other games, including Newcomer, which was built from the ground up. I mentioned Newcomer and Tortured Hearts because it seems to be the type of game they are aiming for here. I specially liked Newcomer, so I am willing to support them.

This is a textbook example of how not to do a Kickstarter project. You don't ask for some sort of "ideal" budget. You make an assessment of how much money you can realistically raise with your set of assets (estimated audience size and whether they see your project as both worth the budget and possible to realize given the said budget, past credentials, how much is already done and how much of what is already done can be presented on your project page in an attractive way, etc.), then see if this number gets you anywhere (i.e. to some sort of finished product) within a reasonable time frame (no more than 18 months). You might find you'll need to scale the project down, or make it episodic, or wait until you have something more palpable than design documents and scripts (besides, a few pieces of quality concept art will always work better than several hundred pages' worth of dialogue). Then you need to start out with an extremely polished presentation on day one, as the first few days will most probably decide the fate of your project, especially if you're asking for a relatively large amount of money. No amount of updates will help if you start out with a lacklustre project page (cf. the Hardcore Tactical Shooter).

I doubt Banner Saga would have worked if they asked for $1,000,000 instead of $100,000 (even the $300,000 they've got now may not have worked). They have the credentials, an attractive presentation, good niche targeting, and, most importantly, based on all that, they chose the optimal amount to ask for. Age of Decadence, as an indie project roughly similar to TH, has already had quite a lot of press and attention, released two demos, can produce any amount of concept art, screenshots, music, gameplay and presentation videos complete with Oscar's salsa dancing and VD smashing peoples' heads in, but if they were to go Kickstarter, I'd still be scared to ask for more than $200,000. I wish the TH guys luck, but there's no way this is going to work out.